David Roberson

Libertarian | Texas

Candidate Profile

Moderate

BIOGRAPHY

Name

David Roberson


Party

Libertarian


Election Year

2022


Election

General


Race

State Rep., Dist. 49


Incumbent

No


Links

David Roberson phones David Roberson emailFacebookLinkedIn

EDUCATION

Baylor University, Waco, B.A. Honors, 2006

South Texas College of Law, Houston, J.D., 2010

WORK & MILITARY

Prime Tax Group LLC, Senior Tax Attorney

AFFILIATIONS

Houston Livestock Show & Rodeo, Committeeman, Directions & Assistance, Sigma Nu Fraternity

POLITICAL OFFICES HELD

Candidate did not provide

POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT

Candidate did not provide

Race

Previous Races

OTHER INFORMATION

QUESTIONNAIRE

RIGHT TO LIFE

Under what circumstances should abortion be allowed?

Recognizing that reproductive rights are a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, LPTexas believes that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration. LPTexas does not condone that tax dollars be spent for any such medical cost.

Abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, should not receive funds from federal, state, or local governments (including Title X grants).

Neutral

I support 'aid in dying' laws which legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Neutral


ECONOMY

What changes, if any, should be made to the tax code?

All persons are entitled to the fruits of their labor. As such, LPTexas opposes the imposition of income tax by any governmental entity. Additionally, we support a Constitutional amendment that would require at least two-thirds majority vote by each house of the legislature to increase the rate of any tax. Taxation should be used only for services that cannot be provided by free market solutions. We seek to reduce the size and scope of government. The budgets of all levels of government must be balanced, and government spending reduced. Each existing tax must have a clearly specified purpose, and be subject to sunset at the end of each legislative session following its effective start date. Expanding on these general principles concerning taxation, LPTexas holds the following positions on issues specific to the state of Texas: II.1.a. Gross Margin Tax LPTexas seeks the complete repeal of the Gross Margins Tax adopted in 2006. Rather than a slow reduction in these franchise taxes, we call for the legislature to reduce the state’s constitutional spending limits. II.1.b. Property Tax LPTexas supports the elimination of all property taxes, as ad valorem tax cannot be assessed objectively, and inequitably harms the poor. Until such taxes are eliminated, we call for a moratorium on appraisal valuation increases. Additionally, we call for the election (subject to the Texas Election Code), not appointment, of all members of any Board of Directors of any Appraisal District. These elected positions would be limited to two consecutive two-year terms, until the positions are abolished along with the ad valorem taxes. II.1.c. Tax Increment Reinvestment Zones Recognizing that Tax Increment Reinvestment Zones (TIRZ) have been abused by many local governments as a means to enrich cronies, LPTexas calls for the abolishment of TIRZ districts. II.1.d. Occupational Licensing The exercise of an occupation or profession should be regarded as a natural right, not subject to regulation or taxation by the government. Government’s role in professional practices, if any, should be limited to protection against fraud or abuse. Therefore, LPTexas advocates for the repeal of all statutes regarding licensing occupations or professional practices. II.1.e. Government Debt LPTexas supports a moratorium on bond issuance, Certificates of Obligation, and all other forms of government borrowing. Additionally, government-owned assets should be liquidated for the repayment of outstanding debt.

What government spending would you reduce in order to balance the budget?

All government spending should be reviewed for appropriate budgetary adjustments

Taxpayer-funded public education should be guaranteed through college.

Disagree


RELIGIOUS LIBERTY

Individuals and businesses should be required to provide services even if it would violate their moral and/or religious beliefs.

Disagree

Under what circumstances can government close churches?

The government is never authorized to close places of worship.


HEALTHCARE

What most closely matches your view on healthcare: A) Healthcare for all should be guaranteed and funded by the government with no private healthcare option. (includes "universal healthcare," "medicare for all," etc.) B) Healthcare insurance funded by the government should be available for all who want it, along with private healthcare options. C) Medicaid and Medicare should remain available, but no other taxpayer-funded programs are necessary. D)Tax-payer funded health care should be abolished in all forms, and Medicaid and Medicare should be de-funded.

Government should neither provide, control, nor require health care. LPTexas does not believe that people have a right to be provided with healthcare at other peoples’ expense. We advocate the phasing out of Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIPS programs. LPTexas supports free market based healthcare systems and health insurance. We oppose a “single payer” concept and the federal legislation known as the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Obama Care). LPTexas opposes any and all forms of unearned tax credits, tax subsidies, and tax penalties that are directed under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or “Obama Care.”

Under what circumstances (if any) should a government, school, or employer be allowed to require vaccinations?

The right of personal bodily autonomy should never be violated by a governmental requirement.


NATIONAL SECURITY

What should the United States do to help eradicate the threat of Islamic terrorism?

The United States should take necessary measures to protect its borders, its citizens, and its allies but avoid military conflict outside its and its allies' borders

I support the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement to pressure Israel to withdraw from occupied territories, remove the separation barrier in the West Bank, allow full equality for Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel, and promote the rights of Palestinian refugees.

Strongly Disagree


IMMIGRATION

The U.S. should do more to physically secure the southern border.

Strongly Agree

Who should be allowed to immigrate to the U.S. and under what circumstances?

The immigration process should be expedited for all those "in-line" and for newcomers. Those with criminal records and/or known associations with criminal organizations should be detained and deported.


VALUES

Judeo-Christian values established a framework of morality which is necessary for our system of limited government.

Neutral

I support adding gender identity as a specially protected class in non-discrimination laws.

Neutral


iVoterGuide Notes:

Candidate notified iVoterGuide that the intended answer to this question should have been ‘Strongly Disagree.’ This change was not considered during panel evaluations.

I agree with Critical Race Theory (CRT) which asserts that the institutions in the United States are fundamentally racist.

Strongly Disagree

Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.

I believe in adhering to the Golden Rule in actions towards others, and respect the beliefs of others to follow their version of religious conviction as they choose.


ELECTIONS AND VOTING

People should be able to vote without photo identification.

Disagree

What laws would you propose to change present voting practices?

Texas voter laws are sufficient. No changes needed.


EQUALITY

Is racism a threat to domestic security in the United States? Why or why not?

There are fringe elements that cling to hate, and those persons and groups should be monitored but allowed to exist provided they do not act against society.

Reparations should be given to people on the basis of race.

Strongly Disagree


ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT

Which comes closest to your view? A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. B) Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost.

A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy

I support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources.

Agree


ABOUT YOU

What do you think is the general purpose of government?

To manage the larger issues effecting the citizenry with the consent of the governed

When you consider your views on a wide range of issues from economic and social matters to foreign policy and religious liberty, which of the following best describes you overall?

Moderate

Please provide publicly available information, including interviews and media reports, validating your answer to the previous question (other than your website).

I have not provided any interviews or media reports at this time as none have been requested

Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized in either civil or criminal court for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.

No

What else would you like voters to know about you, including your legislative priorities?

Reduce taxes, promote educational and healthcare choice, and establish mental health options for society


CRIMINAL JUSTICE & PUBLIC SAFETY

Police officers should be personally immune from prosecution for conduct consistent with departmental policy (qualified immunity) while on duty.

Agree

If conduct is consistent with departmental policy, then the officers are within their rules of conduct. Conduct inconsistent with departmental policy should not be included in qualified immunity coverage.

I support redirecting funds from police departments to mental health and community programs.

Agree

I support redirecting funds to increase police officer training programs and mental health response strategies. An officer should be fully trained and able to respond to most situations, including mental health related matters, in the normal course of duty.


2ND AMENDMENT

What restrictions on gun ownership are needed to protect public safety?

Current firearm laws are sufficient. No new laws are required, but enforcement of current regulations should be prioritized.

Victims of gun violence should be able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers.

Disagree

If you are not already receiving our emails, stay up to date with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.

I agree to receive text messages at the phone number provided.