Lloyd Charles Larsen

Agree

Rape, Incest, or to protect the life of the mother

Strongly Agree

Neutral

Disagree

To ban such transportation in my opinion violates the interstate commerce clause. The use of those drugs may be illegal in Wyoming yet legal in other states that have a right to receive them, which may be via the interstate highway system through Wyoming. This is similar to the states wanting to prohibit the transportation of Wyoming coal through their states because of their "carbon" policy, which Wyoming feels is an infringement of their right to move commodities to market in other states.

I am opposed to having minimum wage requirements. I am also opposed to any discriminatory practices of basing compensation on sex, age, or religion.

Strongly Agree

I am very concerned with the erosion of private property rights in Wyoming. It has become the practice currently to allow neighbors to influence what you can or cannot do with your private property even though the intended use complies with all federal, state, and local regulations. If you are an owner of agricultural property and you want to sell it to a company wanting to build a data center, you have the right to do that.

1) Require any applicant applying for for a mineral or recreational lease on state lands to inform existing lease holders and all neighbors within a mile of the site of there intended application and master plan for the parcel, and provided evidence of those notifications with their application to the Office of State Lands. The Office of State Lands would then be required to notify this group of people of the date the application would be considered by the State Land Board.

In my mind this applies to religious liberty which allows every person the right to worship or not worship as they choose or according to the dictates of their own conscience as long as it does not violate the rights of another person, and the "state" should not interfere or diminish the ability of that right, show preference, or impose the belief of any particular religion on those of other faiths, religions, or who believe differently.

Strongly Disagree

I particularly don't believe a private business owner should be required to provide services in a manner that is contrary to their moral or religious beliefs. This becomes a challenge for the individual working as a government employee that may be expected to provided the government's required service to the public that includes permits, licenses authorizing or permitting activities that are contrary to the employee's religious or moral beliefs. The public has a right to receive those services.

Healthcare in Wyoming is complex and this question reflects a lack of understanding of healthcare delivery. Currently Medicare is for all as they reach the age of eligibility. I align most closely with (C) noting that we currently can enhances the services allowed through Medicaid, and our Wyoming tax dollars fund the state employee health insurance plan which this question suggests would not be allowed. What is the role of state government is a great policy discussion currently in process.

Agree

I will qualify my answer by saying that we don't need to keep a database of people as the questions states. We need to keep track of the various illnesses and the impact of treating those illnesses, and other valuable information that could be tracked such as which drugs are the most effective in the treatment of illnesses, and comparing the cost for treating these illnesses in Wyoming compared to other states, comparing the cost for treating illnesses from hospital to hospital within the state

Strongly Agree

I have very strong concerns with cyber security and intellectual property violations, and less about a military threat.

It is to me. I would suggest Israel has become the United States closest and most trusted ally. I certainly think the Israeli government could improve in some of their diplomatic efforts, but I also think the United States Government has plenty of room to improve.

Strongly Disagree

This notion goes contrary to the role of federal, state, and local governments. The idea that a city government of its own election can decide it doesn't have to comply with state or federal law has no foundation to support it.

Strongly Agree

I do believe the state can administer the educational needs of its citizens without federal oversight. The biggest concern I hear coming from education entities is the impact that would come from the loss of federal funds.

Disagree

I especially think our post secondary institutions need to have the ability to look at funding opportunities globally. Our university's energy related courses and research efforts receiving funds from foreign industries, and students from foreign countries receiving support from their governments. The institution's administration has the responsibility to make sure the intended use of foreign funds and any requirement for the use of those funds comply with the mission of the institution.

Strongly Agree

I have nothing more to add, I think the statement is well said.

Neutral

I think this question is poorly presented for a response. Who is it making the attempts? If it is the parent, does this fall in the same subject matter described in the previous question on the fundamental right of parents? If it is someone other that the parent, then I think they may be violating the parents rights, and there is cause for legal action. I have strong feelings against efforts to transition a child to the opposite sex, but this statement is too broad to agree or disagree.

Strongly Agree

I agree and this is a position I have based on my religious beliefs. BUT religious liberty guaranteed in our constitution allows for freedom to all religions and if a religion allows for a different definition of marriage no government has the authority to alter that definition either. The definition and purpose for marriage for religious purposes may not be the same as that of a civil marriage, both should be accepted as legal. "Render unto Caesar the things which be Caesars "

Strongly Disagree

I think we have woefully let the gaming industry and in particular the Historic Horse Racing expand without appropriate controls. I wish we could start over from the beginning, but we can't. We need to address uncontrolled expansion in my opinion.

I believe in God the Eternal Father, and in His Son Jesus Christ, and in the Holy Ghost. I believe it is my right to worship according to the dictates of my conscience and believe we should allow everyone that same privilege to worship how, where, or what they may.

Strongly Disagree

We require photo ID in other areas of our life for security reasons such getting onto an airplane, and even when we check in at a hotel, so it doesn't seem to me that requiring a photo ID to vote is intrusive or burdensome to insure the person voting can correctly be connected to the ID he is presenting.

Strongly Disagree

If the public policy allowing discriminatory actions has been changed to prohibit such actions, what are we trying to accomplish with reparations? I am not sure any type of financial compensation adds any additional policy, or legal enhancement of a law put into place to prohibit the previous inappropriate policies.

Strongly Agree

My concerns is the intrusion on the privacy of biological females. They too have rights and should not have to subordinate those historically protected rights to a biological male even if his intents are without malice.

Strongly Disagree

I do believe we are seeing climate change, and would argue that climate changes have been taking place repeatedly over time. I do not agree the activities of man have contributed at any significant level to climate change.

Nuclear, it is the most efficient , natural gas and coal both play an important role in the generation of electricity because they can be built more quickly and most of that infrastructure is in place.

Conservative

In my mind I believe I am conservative, but the definition of conservative in the past decade seems to be more ambiguous and harder to measure. I think those around me would consider me within the scale ranging from conservative to moderate.

No

No

To hold people accountable for their actions that have violated the law.

Strongly Agree

I believe mankind has always had the responsibility to protect the innocence of children and to provide an environment that allows a child to grow and develop to their greatest potential. We have a long standing obligation to protect them from any type to exploitation that would stifle their ability to reach their potential.

Disagree

Sharia law as it applies the Muslim religion should be allowed, but similar to the governing tenants of any religion it can not be allowed to infringe on the rights of anyone. I think one can find radical applications or interpretations of most any religion's governing doctrine whether it is Muslim, Christian, or others that when applied they violate the rights of others, which I believe must not be allowed.

Gun ownership should be restricted when: 1) The person is intellectually or developmentally at a level they cannot make appropriate decisions regarding their day to day well being. 2) If the person has previously committed a felony with a gun