Paul Bilyeu

Libertarian | Texas

Candidate Profile

Leans Liberal

BIOGRAPHY

Name

Paul Bilyeu


Party

Libertarian


Election Year

2020


Election

General


Race

State Rep., Dist. 135


Incumbent

No


Links

Paul Bilyeu websitesPaul Bilyeu phones Paul Bilyeu emailFacebookX

EDUCATION

Naval Nuclear Power School, Orlando, No, 1987

WORK & MILITARY

United States Navy, ET1(SS) - E6, 9

AFFILIATIONS

Harris County Libertarian Party, Vice Chair, Treasurer, National Libertarian Party

Lifetime Member

POLITICAL OFFICES HELD

(Candidate did not provide)

POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT

Texas HD135, 2018

Race

OTHER INFORMATION

QUESTIONNAIRE

RIGHT TO LIFE

Human life begins at conception and deserves legal protection at every stage until natural death.

Neutral

Human life begins at conception and deserves legal protection at every stage until natural death.

Neutral

Human life begins at conception and deserves legal protection at every stage until natural death.

Neutral

Abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, should not receive taxpayer funds or grants from federal, state, or local governments.

Strongly Agree

Abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, should not receive taxpayer funds or grants from federal, state, or local governments.

Strongly Agree

Abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, should not receive taxpayer funds or grants from federal, state, or local governments.

Strongly Agree

Under what circumstances should abortion be allowed?

Abortion decisions should be left to individuals and their healthcare providers. Governments should neither prohibit nor fund this service.

Under what circumstances should abortion be allowed?

Abortion decisions should be left to individuals and their healthcare providers. Governments should neither prohibit nor fund this service.

Under what circumstances should abortion be allowed?

Abortion decisions should be left to individuals and their healthcare providers. Governments should neither prohibit nor fund this service.


ECONOMY

It is the government’s responsibility to ensure everyone has a livable income.

Strongly Disagree

It is the government’s responsibility to ensure everyone has a livable income.

Strongly Disagree

It is the government’s responsibility to ensure everyone has a livable income.

Strongly Disagree

Free enterprise and the right to private property are essential elements of a productive economic system.

Strongly Agree

Free enterprise and the right to private property are essential elements of a productive economic system.

Strongly Agree

Free enterprise and the right to private property are essential elements of a productive economic system.

Strongly Agree

What government spending would you reduce in order to balance the budget?

Too many to list. The major ones have already been mentioned previously. There would be cuts across the board. Every single government expense would be scrutinized, and in most cases, abolished, if I were elected.

What government spending would you reduce in order to balance the budget?

Too many to list. The major ones have already been mentioned previously. There would be cuts across the board. Every single government expense would be scrutinized, and in most cases, abolished, if I were elected.

What government spending would you reduce in order to balance the budget?

Too many to list. The major ones have already been mentioned previously. There would be cuts across the board. Every single government expense would be scrutinized, and in most cases, abolished, if I were elected.


RELIGIOUS LIBERTY

Governments should not discriminate against individuals, organizations or small businesses because of their belief that marriage is only a union of one man and one woman.

Strongly Agree

Governments should not discriminate against individuals, organizations or small businesses because of their belief that marriage is only a union of one man and one woman.

Strongly Agree

Governments should not discriminate against individuals, organizations or small businesses because of their belief that marriage is only a union of one man and one woman.

Strongly Agree

Governments should define marriage as between one man and one woman; no other definition of marriage should be legalized or supported with taxpayer or public funds.

Strongly Disagree

Governments should define marriage as between one man and one woman; no other definition of marriage should be legalized or supported with taxpayer or public funds.

Strongly Disagree

Governments should define marriage as between one man and one woman; no other definition of marriage should be legalized or supported with taxpayer or public funds.

Strongly Disagree

Religious liberty is at risk in the United States and deserves the highest level of protection in the law.

Neutral

Religious liberty is at risk in the United States and deserves the highest level of protection in the law.

Neutral

Religious liberty is at risk in the United States and deserves the highest level of protection in the law.

Neutral

I promise to protect the freedom of Christians to share the Gospel and to practice Biblical principles.

Yes

I promise to protect the freedom of Christians to share the Gospel and to practice Biblical principles.

Yes

I promise to protect the freedom of Christians to share the Gospel and to practice Biblical principles.

Yes

What does "separation of church and state" mean to you?

No religion should be integrated with a governing body. Nor do governments have any right to restrict religion.

What does "separation of church and state" mean to you?

No religion should be integrated with a governing body. Nor do governments have any right to restrict religion.

What does "separation of church and state" mean to you?

No religion should be integrated with a governing body. Nor do governments have any right to restrict religion.


HEALTHCARE

It is the government’s responsibility to ensure everyone has health insurance.

Strongly Disagree

It is the government’s responsibility to ensure everyone has health insurance.

Strongly Disagree

It is the government’s responsibility to ensure everyone has health insurance.

Strongly Disagree

How would you promote healthcare coverage that is adequate, affordable and accessible for all?

Remove government from healthcare altogether. Once government regulation and control is removed from health care, insurance, and prescription drugs, the free market will take over and drastically reduce price for everyone. Healthcare will become affordable for all.

How would you promote healthcare coverage that is adequate, affordable and accessible for all?

Remove government from healthcare altogether. Once government regulation and control is removed from health care, insurance, and prescription drugs, the free market will take over and drastically reduce price for everyone. Healthcare will become affordable for all.

How would you promote healthcare coverage that is adequate, affordable and accessible for all?

Remove government from healthcare altogether. Once government regulation and control is removed from health care, insurance, and prescription drugs, the free market will take over and drastically reduce price for everyone. Healthcare will become affordable for all.


NATIONAL SECURITY

The best way to maintain peace is through a strong military.

Strongly Disagree

The best way to maintain peace is through a strong military.

Strongly Disagree

The best way to maintain peace is through a strong military.

Strongly Disagree


IMMIGRATION

I am in favor of construction of a wall and other necessary infrastructure on our border that gives complete control over entering and exiting the United States.

Strongly Disagree

I am in favor of construction of a wall and other necessary infrastructure on our border that gives complete control over entering and exiting the United States.

Strongly Disagree

I am in favor of construction of a wall and other necessary infrastructure on our border that gives complete control over entering and exiting the United States.

Strongly Disagree

State and federal funds should be denied to any public or private entity, including but not limited to sanctuary cities, that are not in compliance with immigration laws.

Neutral

State and federal funds should be denied to any public or private entity, including but not limited to sanctuary cities, that are not in compliance with immigration laws.

Neutral

State and federal funds should be denied to any public or private entity, including but not limited to sanctuary cities, that are not in compliance with immigration laws.

Neutral

Who should be allowed to immigrate to the U.S. and under what circumstances?

Peaceful people wishing to better their situation should not be hindered by imaginary lines on a map. Along with that, there should not be government incentives to bring people here who want to freeload on our system. I would welcome anyone who wants to come here to peacefully live, work and prosper.

Who should be allowed to immigrate to the U.S. and under what circumstances?

Peaceful people wishing to better their situation should not be hindered by imaginary lines on a map. Along with that, there should not be government incentives to bring people here who want to freeload on our system. I would welcome anyone who wants to come here to peacefully live, work and prosper.

Who should be allowed to immigrate to the U.S. and under what circumstances?

Peaceful people wishing to better their situation should not be hindered by imaginary lines on a map. Along with that, there should not be government incentives to bring people here who want to freeload on our system. I would welcome anyone who wants to come here to peacefully live, work and prosper.


EDUCATION

Taxpayer-funded public education should be guaranteed through college.

Strongly Disagree

Taxpayer-funded public education should be guaranteed through college.

Strongly Disagree

Taxpayer-funded public education should be guaranteed through college.

Strongly Disagree


VALUES

Judeo-Christian values established a framework of morality which is necessary for our system of limited government.

Strongly Disagree

Judeo-Christian values established a framework of morality which is necessary for our system of limited government.

Strongly Disagree

Judeo-Christian values established a framework of morality which is necessary for our system of limited government.

Strongly Disagree

I support adding sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression as protected classes in non-discrimination laws.

Neutral

I support adding sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression as protected classes in non-discrimination laws.

Neutral

I support adding sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression as protected classes in non-discrimination laws.

Neutral

Promotion of the LGBT agenda in public schools, including teaching of “sexual orientation” and “gender identity”, is completely inappropriate and should be opposed at the state and local level.

Neutral

Promotion of the LGBT agenda in public schools, including teaching of “sexual orientation” and “gender identity”, is completely inappropriate and should be opposed at the state and local level.

Neutral

I support allowing public high school students to participate in athletic competition based on the gender with which they identify instead of biological sex.

Neutral

I support allowing public high school students to participate in athletic competition based on the gender with which they identify instead of biological sex.

Neutral

Promotion of the LGBT agenda in public schools, including teaching of “sexual orientation” and “gender identity”, is completely inappropriate and should be opposed at the state and local level.

Neutral

I support allowing public high school students to participate in athletic competition based on the gender with which they identify instead of biological sex.

Neutral

Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.

Agnostic.

Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.

Agnostic.

Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.

Agnostic.


ABOUT YOU

When you consider your views on a wide range of issues from economic and social matters to foreign policy and immigration, which of the following best describes you overall?

Moderate

Please provide publicly available information validating your answer to the previous question.

These surveys skews exclusively to the left/right paradigm. I prefer an additional axis when discussing political beliefs. On the X axis is Conservative and Liberal and on the Y is Authoritarian to Individualism. I would be at Zero on the X axis and at the very end of the Y axis towards individualism. The question above, nor any of the survey questions above that, provide options that fit the individualism mentality. In those cases, I either have to choose No Answer or neutral. In general, if the question begins with "Should government..." or "Is it the government's responsibility to..." the answer would always be no.

When you consider your views on a wide range of issues from economic and social matters to foreign policy and immigration, which of the following best describes you overall?

Moderate

When you consider your views on a wide range of issues from economic and social matters to foreign policy and immigration, which of the following best describes you overall?

Moderate

Please provide publicly available information validating your answer to the previous question.

These surveys skews exclusively to the left/right paradigm. I prefer an additional axis when discussing political beliefs. On the X axis is Conservative and Liberal and on the Y is Authoritarian to Individualism. I would be at Zero on the X axis and at the very end of the Y axis towards individualism. The question above, nor any of the survey questions above that, provide options that fit the individualism mentality. In those cases, I either have to choose No Answer or neutral. In general, if the question begins with "Should government..." or "Is it the government's responsibility to..." the answer would always be no.

Please provide publicly available information validating your answer to the previous question.

These surveys skews exclusively to the left/right paradigm. I prefer an additional axis when discussing political beliefs. On the X axis is Conservative and Liberal and on the Y is Authoritarian to Individualism. I would be at Zero on the X axis and at the very end of the Y axis towards individualism. The question above, nor any of the survey questions above that, provide options that fit the individualism mentality. In those cases, I either have to choose No Answer or neutral. In general, if the question begins with "Should government..." or "Is it the government's responsibility to..." the answer would always be no.

What education or experience qualifies you to hold the office for which you seek election?

Why does one require education or experience? I am a 50+ year old registered voter in my district? Does that not make me qualified? Beyond that, I spent 9 years in the US Navy, and 25 years in various roles in the industrial automation industry.

What education or experience qualifies you to hold the office for which you seek election?

Why does one require education or experience? I am a 50+ year old registered voter in my district? Does that not make me qualified? Beyond that, I spent 9 years in the US Navy, and 25 years in various roles in the industrial automation industry.

What education or experience qualifies you to hold the office for which you seek election?

Why does one require education or experience? I am a 50+ year old registered voter in my district? Does that not make me qualified? Beyond that, I spent 9 years in the US Navy, and 25 years in various roles in the industrial automation industry.

Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.

Never.

Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.

Never.

Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.

Never.

Is there anything else you would like voters to know about you?

Voters have been electing the same two parties for generations. Why not try something different? Why not choose someone who BELIEVES in freedom instead of just talking about it? One guarantee I will make. I will NEVER be owned or beholden to any person, legislator, government bureaucrat, corporation, lobbyist, group, political action committee or political party. I will vote for less government and more freedom every single time. Ask either of my opponents if they will make that same guarantee.

Is there anything else you would like voters to know about you?

Voters have been electing the same two parties for generations. Why not try something different? Why not choose someone who BELIEVES in freedom instead of just talking about it? One guarantee I will make. I will NEVER be owned or beholden to any person, legislator, government bureaucrat, corporation, lobbyist, group, political action committee or political party. I will vote for less government and more freedom every single time. Ask either of my opponents if they will make that same guarantee.

Is there anything else you would like voters to know about you?

Voters have been electing the same two parties for generations. Why not try something different? Why not choose someone who BELIEVES in freedom instead of just talking about it? One guarantee I will make. I will NEVER be owned or beholden to any person, legislator, government bureaucrat, corporation, lobbyist, group, political action committee or political party. I will vote for less government and more freedom every single time. Ask either of my opponents if they will make that same guarantee.


JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY

I support the use of Sharia law as a basis for legislation and judicial decisions in the United States.

Strongly Disagree

I support the use of Sharia law as a basis for legislation and judicial decisions in the United States.

Strongly Disagree

I support the use of Sharia law as a basis for legislation and judicial decisions in the United States.

Strongly Disagree


CRIMINAL JUSTICE & PUBLIC SAFETY

Mandatory minimum sentencing should be required and enforced for violent crimes.

Strongly Disagree

Mandatory minimum sentencing should be required and enforced for violent crimes.

Strongly Disagree

Mandatory minimum sentencing should be required and enforced for violent crimes.

Strongly Disagree


2ND AMENDMENT

Should teachers be allowed to carry guns at school?

Yes

Should teachers be allowed to carry guns at school?

Yes

Should teachers be allowed to carry guns at school?

Yes

What restrictions on gun ownership are needed to protect public safety?

None

What restrictions on gun ownership are needed to protect public safety?

None

What restrictions on gun ownership are needed to protect public safety?

None


OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES

People should be able to vote without photo identification.

Agree

People should be able to vote without photo identification.

Agree

People should be able to vote without photo identification.

Agree

I support the legalization of recreational marijuana.

Strongly Agree

I support the legalization of recreational marijuana.

Strongly Agree

I support the legalization of recreational marijuana.

Strongly Agree

The Electoral College should be abolished.

Strongly Disagree

The Electoral College should be abolished.

Strongly Disagree

The Electoral College should be abolished.

Strongly Disagree

In priority order, what three areas of legislation do you propose to author or sponsor if elected?

Abolish Article 7 of the Texas Constitution which calls for public, taxpayer funded, education. Allow local communities to make their own decisions on education. Abolish ad valorem (property) taxes Abolish qualified immunity and civil asset forfeiture. BONUS: End the drug war in Texas starting with the legalization of marijuana.

Is racism a threat to domestic security in the United States? Why or why not?

I don't believe it to be a threat to domestic security but it is something that we all need to better understand and deal with. Significant racism, of all kinds, still exists in our world. We need honest, open and frequent communications between all groups. Talking these things through is FAR better than the cycle of violence we are seeing. In my worldview, government is the primary contributor to racism in this and other countries. Governments create systems that naturally place people at odds. If we significantly reduce and eliminate government, wherever possible, many of the things that create the racism would evaporate. That certainly won't fix everyone. Some people just have dark hearts.

In priority order, what three areas of legislation do you propose to author or sponsor if elected?

Abolish Article 7 of the Texas Constitution which calls for public, taxpayer funded, education. Allow local communities to make their own decisions on education. Abolish ad valorem (property) taxes Abolish qualified immunity and civil asset forfeiture. BONUS: End the drug war in Texas starting with the legalization of marijuana.

In priority order, what three areas of legislation do you propose to author or sponsor if elected?

Abolish Article 7 of the Texas Constitution which calls for public, taxpayer funded, education. Allow local communities to make their own decisions on education. Abolish ad valorem (property) taxes Abolish qualified immunity and civil asset forfeiture. BONUS: End the drug war in Texas starting with the legalization of marijuana.

Is racism a threat to domestic security in the United States? Why or why not?

I don't believe it to be a threat to domestic security but it is something that we all need to better understand and deal with. Significant racism, of all kinds, still exists in our world. We need honest, open and frequent communications between all groups. Talking these things through is FAR better than the cycle of violence we are seeing. In my worldview, government is the primary contributor to racism in this and other countries. Governments create systems that naturally place people at odds. If we significantly reduce and eliminate government, wherever possible, many of the things that create the racism would evaporate. That certainly won't fix everyone. Some people just have dark hearts.

Is racism a threat to domestic security in the United States? Why or why not?

I don't believe it to be a threat to domestic security but it is something that we all need to better understand and deal with. Significant racism, of all kinds, still exists in our world. We need honest, open and frequent communications between all groups. Talking these things through is FAR better than the cycle of violence we are seeing. In my worldview, government is the primary contributor to racism in this and other countries. Governments create systems that naturally place people at odds. If we significantly reduce and eliminate government, wherever possible, many of the things that create the racism would evaporate. That certainly won't fix everyone. Some people just have dark hearts.

If you are not already receiving our emails, stay up to date with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.

I agree to receive text messages at the phone number provided.