Shamiracle Johnson Rankin
Non-Partisan | Georgia
Candidate Profile
Activist
BIOGRAPHY
Name
Shamiracle Johnson Rankin
Party
Non-Partisan
Election Year
2026
Election
Republican Primary, Judicial General and Senate District 7 Specials
Race
Justice of the Supreme Court, Bethel
Incumbent
No
Links
EDUCATION
Candidate did not provide
WORK & MILITARY
Candidate did not provide
AFFILIATIONS
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES HELD
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT
Candidate did not provide
ENDORSEMENTS
LIBERAL (7)
Emily's List
SEIU Service Employees International Union
Georgia Equality PAC
Fair Fight
Georgia Conservation Voters Action Fund
OTHER INFORMATION
During an interview with “The Contrarian,” Rankin identified her judicial philosophy as “liberal” stating:
“It would be more of a liberal judicial philosophy. I think I would definitely follow the rule of law and the Constitution. Georgia’s Constitution’s really broad, as you may know, so it’s important that we have justices who will actually read the Constitution for the full breadth of protections that it provides the citizens of our state. I also believe it’s important that You understand your justices that are on the court, and the life experiences that they bring with them to the court, because it also helps shape perspectives, and that’s why we have a court that listens, and it’s more than one person, right? Because they’re able to bring in those life experiences along with the rule of law that they’reinterpreting.”
Former president of Georgia Association of Black Women Attorneys.
At a campaign announcement, Rankin highlighted her approach to the judiciary, stating:
“A justice must approach every case with independence, careful judgment, and respect for the Constitution and the law — without political pressure or personal agenda.”
On her campaign Facebook page, Rankin posted:
“In 2019, I invited Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg to speak to Georgia’s Young Lawyers Division. She wrote back and closed the letter with a phrase I’ve never forgotten: 'Every good wish.' Such a simple line from a giant in our legal history — a trailblazer whose brilliance opened doors for generations of women. Since then, I’ve used the same closing in my own letters — a quiet reminder of her impact and influence. On her birthday, and during Women’s History Month, I’m grateful for her legacy. Every good wish, Justice Ginsburg.”
At a press conference on February 24, 2026, Miracle Rankin, a trial lawyer and former president of the Georgia Association of Black Women Attorneys, discussed her campaign for the Georgia Supreme Court, stating, “I’m not just going to sit down and do nothing because someone has to stand up for Georgia’s civil liberties that are being stripped away.” She emphasized the need for proactive leadership on the court, adding, “We do understand that we’re doing something that people don’t frequently do, but we’re living in a time where we have to have leaders who are willing to step up and do things that are uncommon to get uncommon results for our state.”
QUESTIONNAIRE
RIGHT TO LIFE
Was Dobbs v. Jackson rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: In Dobbs, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the federal constitution does not confer a right to abortion.)
Did not answer
Does the federal Constitution support the right to physician assisted suicide? Please explain in light of Washington v. Glucksberg (1997).
Did not answer
Human life deserves legal protection from conception until natural death.
Did not answer
How do you view the judiciary’s role in matters of abortion regulation following Dobbs?
Did not answer
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
Do you believe religious liberty is at risk in the United States. If so, what is the judiciary's proper role in addressing this issue?
Did not answer
Does the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment require government to be strictly secular or does it allow for the nation's religious heritage?
Did not answer
Was Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: The U.S. Supreme Court held tha the state may not show religious hostility when enforcing anti-discrimination laws against a business owner.)
Did not answer
CRIMINAL JUSTICE & PUBLIC SAFETY
The burden of proof in a criminal case is generally that the state must provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Some say the reason the burden of proof is so high is because we greatly value ensuring that the innocent are not unjustly imprisoned. Please comment on this topic.
Did not answer
When reviewing wrongful conviction claims, what role, if any, should judges play in determining remedies?
Did not answer
2ND AMENDMENT
What is your understanding of the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms?
Did not answer
OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES
Which branch of government do you believe was intended to wield the most authority?
Did not answer
JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY
Describe your judicial philosophy.
Did not answer
Do you believe judges should primarily apply the law according to its original public meaning, or do you believe the law evolves over time to reflect contemporary values?
Did not answer
Which current or past U.S. Supreme Court justice best reflects your judicial philosophy?
Did not answer
Was Obergefell v. Hodges rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: The U.S. Supreme Court held Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses create a right for same-sex couples to marry.)
Did not answer
A. How should a judge approach a case where the constitutional or statutory text is clear on its face? B. Conversely, how should a judge proceed when the text is ambiguous or silent on a disputed issue?
Did not answer
What is your view of judicial restraint versus judicial activism? How do you define each?
Did not answer
What is the proper role of a judge?
Did not answer
When applying or interpreting the text of a statute or constitutional provision, is it ever proper for a judge to consider present day public opinion or consequences?
Did not answer
If precedent departs from the Constitution’s text or original meaning, should a judge follow it or correct the error? Please explain.
Did not answer
ABOUT YOU
Have you ever been convicted of a felony? If so, please explain.
Did not answer
Have you ever been penalized for sexual misconduct in either civil or criminal court? If so, please explain.
Did not answer
I voted in these primaries and general elections:
Did not answer
VALUES
Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.
Did not answer
What is your understanding of parental rights under the Constitution regarding the upbringing of children, particularly regarding choices about education and sexual identity?
Did not answer
Is gender identity a protected class under the Constitution? Please explain the constitutional basis for your view.
Did not answer
