Craig Collins

Republican | North Carolina

Craig Collins websites FacebookX

Candidate Profile

Court of Appeals, Place 3 North Carolina General | November 3, 2026

Originalist

BIOGRAPHY

EDUCATION

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, BA, 1990-1994

Villanova University School of Law, Villanova, PA, JD, 1994-1997

WORK & MILITARY

Gaston County District Attorney's Office, Assistant District Attorney, 1997-2006

Law Office of Craig Collins, Attorney, 2007-2016

NC Administrative Office of the Courts, District Court Judge, 2016-2024

NC Administrative Office of the Courts, Superior Court Judge, 2025-2026

AFFILIATIONS

City Church, Gastonia, NC, Usher, youth coach, greeter, 2004-2026

NC Faith and Freedom Coalition, Volunteer, 2009-2026

POLITICAL OFFICES HELD

District Court Judge, 2016-2024

Superior Court Judge, 2025-2026

Chairman, Gaston County Republican Party, 2011-2013

Chairman, NC Tenth District Republican Party, 2013-2015

POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT

NC Court of Appeals, Seat #3, 2026-2026

ENDORSEMENTS

CONSERVATIVE (1)

North Carolina Values Coalition

SELECTED CONTRIBUTIONS

CONSERVATIVE
GIVEN BY CANDIDATE (5)

Republican Womens Organizations (2020)

State Republican Party Organizations (2020)

Local, County, and District Republican Organizations (2015)

Chris Dillon (2012)

Kathy Harrington (2008)

RECEIVED BY CANDIDATE (11)

Dave Craven (2026)

John Aneralla (2026)

Local, County, and District Republican Organizations (2026)

Local, County, District Republican Organizations (2026)

Republican Womens Organizations (2026)


QUESTIONNAIRE

RIGHT TO LIFE

Was Dobbs v. Jackson rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: In Dobbs, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the federal constitution does not confer a right to abortion.)

Judicial standards prevent me from indicating how I would decide cases that could come before me as a jurist. Our nation's founding documents tell us that our nation was founded on the self evident fact, "that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." All Constitutional rights should be protected.

Does the federal Constitution support the right to physician assisted suicide? Please explain in light of Washington v. Glucksberg (1997).

Judicial standards prevent me from indicating how I would decide cases that could come before me as a jurist.

Human life deserves legal protection from conception until natural death.

Choose not to answer

Judicial standards prevent me from indicating how I would decide cases that could come before me as a jurist. The North Carolina Constitution tells us that, "We hold it to be self-evident that all persons are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, the enjoyment of the fruits of their own labor, and the pursuit of happiness." All Constitutional rights should be protected.

How do you view the judiciary’s role in matters of abortion regulation following Dobbs?

Judicial standards prevent me from indicating how I would decide cases that could come before me as a jurist. The North Carolina Constitution tells us that, "We hold it to be self-evident that all persons are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, the enjoyment of the fruits of their own labor, and the pursuit of happiness." All Constitutional rights should be protected.


RELIGIOUS LIBERTY

Do you believe religious liberty is at risk in the United States. If so, what is the judiciary's proper role in addressing this issue?

Judicial standards prevent me from indicating how I would decide cases that could come before me as a jurist. The North Carolina Constitution clearly states that, "All persons have a natural and inalienable right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences, and no human authority shall, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience." All Constitutional rights should be protected.

Does the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment require government to be strictly secular or does it allow for the nation's religious heritage?

Judicial standards prevent me from indicating how I would decide cases that could come before me as a jurist. The Preamble of the North Carolina Constitution clearly states, "We, the people of the State of North Carolina, grateful to Almighty God, the Sovereign Ruler of Nations, for the preservation of the American Union and the existence of our civil, political and religious liberties, and acknowledging our dependence upon Him for the continuance of those blessings to us and our posterity, do, for the more certain security thereof and for the better government of this State, ordain and establish this Constitution." All Constitutional rights should be protected.

Was Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: The U.S. Supreme Court held tha the state may not show religious hostility when enforcing anti-discrimination laws against a business owner.)

Judicial standards prevent me from indicating how I would decide cases that could come before me as a jurist. The North Carolina Constitution clearly states that, "All persons have a natural and inalienable right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences, and no human authority shall, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience." Additionally, it states that we "are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, the enjoyment of the fruits of their own labor, and the pursuit of happiness." All Constitutional rights should be protected.


VALUES

Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.

My faith in Christ is the center of my life, and I shape my values based on my desire to reflect Him in all I do. I remind myself daily of the words of 2 Corinthians 5:20, "Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God."

What is your understanding of parental rights under the Constitution regarding the upbringing of children, particularly regarding choices about education and sexual identity?

Judicial standards prevent me from indicating how I would decide cases that could come before me as a jurist. The North Carolina Constitution clearly states that, "All persons have a natural and inalienable right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences, and no human authority shall, in any case whatever, control or interfere with the rights of conscience." All Constitutional rights should be protected.

Is gender identity a protected class under the Constitution? Please explain the constitutional basis for your view.

Judicial standards prevent me from indicating how I would decide cases that could come before me as a jurist.


ABOUT YOU

Have you ever been convicted of a felony? If so, please explain.

No.

Have you ever been penalized for sexual misconduct in either civil or criminal court? If so, please explain.

No.

I voted in these primaries and general elections:

2016 Republican Primary 2016 General Election 2018 Republican Primary 2018 General Election 2020 Republican Primary 2020 General Election 2022 Republican Primary 2022 General Election 2024 Republican Primary 2024 General Election


JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY

Describe your judicial philosophy.

I am a Constitutional Conservative.

Do you believe judges should primarily apply the law according to its original public meaning, or do you believe the law evolves over time to reflect contemporary values?

The Constitution should be followed as written. Documents do not change meaning or wording absent following the Amendment process.

Which current or past U.S. Supreme Court justice best reflects your judicial philosophy?

Justice Clarence Thomas

Was Obergefell v. Hodges rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: The U.S. Supreme Court held Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses create a right for same-sex couples to marry.)

Judicial standards prevent me from indicating how I would decide cases that could come before me as a jurist.

A. How should a judge approach a case where the constitutional or statutory text is clear on its face? B. Conversely, how should a judge proceed when the text is ambiguous or silent on a disputed issue?

When the text is clear on its face, the text speaks for itself. A judge should not look further to add meaning to that text. When text is ambiguous or silent on a disputed issue, looking to the intent of the authors becomes necessary. The judge's personal policy wishes should be irrelevant.

What is your view of judicial restraint versus judicial activism? How do you define each?

Judicial restraint is necessary to protect our form of government. The Courts have always been the final arbitrator of what is Constitutional, but that only works when the Courts restrain themselves from overstepping their proper role. Activist judges who desire to write laws from the bench risk a constitutional crisis.

What is the proper role of a judge?

The proper role of a judge is to strictly follow the Constitution and to protect our God given rights.

When applying or interpreting the text of a statute or constitutional provision, is it ever proper for a judge to consider present day public opinion or consequences?

No.

If precedent departs from the Constitution’s text or original meaning, should a judge follow it or correct the error? Please explain.

Courts have an obligation to correct error when the interpretation of the law was clearly erroneous and had no basis in the law.


CRIMINAL JUSTICE & PUBLIC SAFETY

The burden of proof in a criminal case is generally that the state must provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt.  Some say the reason the burden of proof is so high is because we greatly value ensuring that the innocent are not unjustly imprisoned.  Please comment on this topic.

I have prosecuted criminal violations, defended against them, and presided over countless criminal trials. In a criminal trial, our citizens need to be protected from having the government unjustly take their freedoms. Without a high burden of proof, the government could weaponize the judicial system against segments of the community that the government wishes to suppress. We must stand guard to protect our citizens from anyone who wishes to unjustly do them harm, whether a criminal or an all-powerful government.

When reviewing wrongful conviction claims, what role, if any, should judges play in determining remedies?

Nobody wants a wrongful conviction to stand. The courts need to act immediately to address any wrongful convictions.


2ND AMENDMENT

What is your understanding of the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms?

Judicial standards prevent me from indicating how I would decide cases that could come before me as a jurist. The Second Amendment clearly states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." All Constitutional rights should be protected.


OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES

Which branch of government do you believe was intended to wield the most authority?

Judicial standards prevent me from indicating how I would decide cases that could come before me as a jurist.

If you are not already receiving our updates, stay current with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.

I agree to receive text messages at the mobile number provided.