Andrew King

Republican | Ohio

Candidate Profile

Leans Conservative

BIOGRAPHY

Name

Andrew King


Party

Republican


Election Year

2026


Election

Republican Primary


Race

Supreme Court Justice, 2


Incumbent

No


Links

Andrew King websites FacebookXInstagramLinkedIn

EDUCATION

Capital University Law School, Columbus, JD

Ohio State, Columbus, BA

WORK & MILITARY

Candidate did not provide

AFFILIATIONS

Candidate did not provide

POLITICAL OFFICES HELD

Judge, Ohio Court of Appeals, Fifth District

POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT

Supreme Court of Ohio

ENDORSEMENTS

CONSERVATIVE (4)

Ohio Right to Life PAC

Clermont County Republican Party

Butler County Republican Party

Ohio Conservatives PAC

OTHER (2)

Mark Fraizer

Andrew Brenner

REPORTED BY CANDIDATE (8)

Monroe County GOP

Washington County GOP

Licking County GOP

Lake County GOP

Brown County GOP

SELECTED CONTRIBUTIONS

CONSERVATIVE
GIVEN BY CANDIDATE (14)

Daniel R. Hawkins (2025)

Justin Pizzulli (2025)

Kevin Ritter (2025)

Megan Shanahan (2025)

Michele Reynolds (2025)

RECEIVED BY CANDIDATE (0)

OTHER INFORMATION

In re G.S. (2025). Authored. The Court agreed with the lower court to terminate the father’s parental rights and give permanent custody of his two children, G.S. and Z.S., to the Stark County Department of Job and Family Services. The Court found that the children could not safely live with their father within a reasonable time and that permanent custody was in their best interest. The agency had made reasonable efforts to help the father reunite with the children, and G.S. had been in temporary custody for 12 of 22 months, which the law expressly listed as grounds to support permanent custody. The Court argued that the father had not addressed the problems that led to the children’s removal, including difficulty understanding medical instructions, inconsistent participation in mental health treatment, failure to complete parenting programs, unsafe handling during visits, and lack of stable housing or employment. Thus, the Court concluded that there was clear and convincing evidence the father was unable to provide a safe and stable home for his children, and that granting permanent custody to the Stark County Department of Job and Family Services was necessary to protect their well-being and serve their best interests.

In re S.D. (2025) Authored. The court agreed with the lower court that the mother’s parental rights should be ended and the child, S.D., should stay with the county child services (FCCPS) permanently. The mother argued the hearing happened too early, but the court said the child had been in temporary care long enough for the hearing to be allowed. The mother hadn’t followed her case plan—she missed counseling, drug tests, mental health and parenting programs, and didn’t have stable housing. The court saw that S.D. had been through trauma and needed a safe, stable home. The guardian ad litem also agreed permanent custody with FCCPS was best. The court decided the evidence clearly showed this was the right choice.

In re N.B.G. (2025). Authored. The Court held that the grandmother’s appeal was dismissed because she lacked standing. She was not a party to the permanent custody case and did not file to get legal custody or join the proceedings. Even though she had custody before, she didn’t take the steps required to be formally involved. The court had given permanent custody of the child to Stark County Job and Family Services, and because the grandmother wasn’t a proper party, the appeal was dismissed without looking at her arguments.


In re M.A. (2024). Authored. The court agreed with the lower court to end Father’s parental rights and give permanent custody of the child to the Holmes County Department of Job and Family Services. The court found that Father had abandoned the child because he hadn’t had contact for over 90 days, had been in jail for a long time, and couldn’t care for the child for at least 18 months. The court also decided that permanent custody was in the child’s best interest, looking at things like the child’s relationship with caregivers, the child’s wishes, and the need for a stable home.

State v. Striblin (2024). Authored. The court overturned Striblin’s conviction for having a gun in a Class D liquor establishment because the law wasn’t supported by historical evidence from the Founding Era. The case arose after Striblin had brought a concealed gun into a bar, drank alcohol, and shot someone during a fight in the restroom.Under Bruen, gun law must match historical traditions, and the court found early laws about guns and alcohol were rare and narrow. The State’s arguments using later laws or “crowded space” ideas didn’t persuade the court. Because Ohio Class D places include bars, theaters, and wine tastings, a blanket ban on guns wasn’t historically justified. 

QUESTIONNAIRE

RIGHT TO LIFE

Was Dobbs v. Jackson rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: In Dobbs, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the federal constitution does not confer a right to abortion.)

Did not answer

Does the federal Constitution support the right to physician assisted suicide? Please explain in light of Washington v. Glucksberg (1997).

Did not answer

Human life deserves legal protection from conception until natural death.

Did not answer

How do you view the judiciary’s role in matters of abortion regulation following Dobbs?

Did not answer


RELIGIOUS LIBERTY

Do you believe religious liberty is at risk in the United States. If so, what is the judiciary's proper role in addressing this issue?

Did not answer

Does the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment require government to be strictly secular or does it allow for the nation's religious heritage?

Did not answer

Was Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: The U.S. Supreme Court held tha the state may not show religious hostility when enforcing anti-discrimination laws against a business owner.)

Did not answer


CRIMINAL JUSTICE & PUBLIC SAFETY

The burden of proof in a criminal case is generally that the state must provide proof beyond a reasonable doubt.  Some say the reason the burden of proof is so high is because we greatly value ensuring that the innocent are not unjustly imprisoned.  Please comment on this topic.

Did not answer

When reviewing wrongful conviction claims, what role, if any, should judges play in determining remedies?

Did not answer


2ND AMENDMENT

What is your understanding of the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms?

Did not answer


OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES

Which branch of government do you believe was intended to wield the most authority?

Did not answer


JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY

Describe your judicial philosophy.

Did not answer

Do you believe judges should primarily apply the law according to its original public meaning, or do you believe the law evolves over time to reflect contemporary values?

Did not answer

Which current or past U.S. Supreme Court justice best reflects your judicial philosophy?

Did not answer

Was Obergefell v. Hodges rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: The U.S. Supreme Court held Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses create a right for same-sex couples to marry.)

Did not answer

A. How should a judge approach a case where the constitutional or statutory text is clear on its face? B. Conversely, how should a judge proceed when the text is ambiguous or silent on a disputed issue?

Did not answer

What is your view of judicial restraint versus judicial activism? How do you define each?

Did not answer

What is the proper role of a judge?

Did not answer

When applying or interpreting the text of a statute or constitutional provision, is it ever proper for a judge to consider present day public opinion or consequences?

Did not answer

If precedent departs from the Constitution’s text or original meaning, should a judge follow it or correct the error? Please explain.

Did not answer


ABOUT YOU

Have you ever been convicted of a felony? If so, please explain.

Did not answer

Have you ever been penalized for sexual misconduct in either civil or criminal court? If so, please explain.

Did not answer

I voted in these primaries and general elections:

Did not answer


VALUES

Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.

Did not answer

What is your understanding of parental rights under the Constitution regarding the upbringing of children, particularly regarding choices about education and sexual identity?

Did not answer

Is gender identity a protected class under the Constitution? Please explain the constitutional basis for your view.

Did not answer

If you are not already receiving our emails, stay up to date with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.

I agree to receive text messages at the phone number provided.