
DaSean Jones
Democrat | Texas
Candidate Profile*
Activist
BIOGRAPHY
Name
DaSean Jones
Party
Democrat
Election Year
2024
Election
General
Race
Justice, Supreme Court, Place 2
Incumbent
No
EDUCATION
Candidate did not provide
WORK & MILITARY
Candidate did not provide
AFFILIATIONS
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES HELD
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT
Candidate did not provide
ENDORSEMENTS*
LIBERAL (18)
Texas Democrats with Disabilities
Vote Vets
Texas Gulf Coast Area Labor Federation, AFL-CIO
Texas AFL-CIO
American Federation of Teachers AFT Texas
SELECTED CONTRIBUTIONS
LIBERAL
GIVEN BY CANDIDATE (10)
ActBlue (2024)
Local, County, and District Democratic Organizations (2024)
Texas Coalition of Black Democrats (2024)
Clubs in Action (2022)
Democratic Socialists of America (2022)
RECEIVED BY CANDIDATE (2)
Adrienne Bell (2022)
Democracy for America (2018)
OTHER INFORMATION
Posted to Facebook, "It is essential for Texans to understand the importance of voting this year. Vote - DaSean Jones for Texas Supreme Court, Place 2. Texans want officials who will consider better wages and benefits, fully-funded neighborhood public schools with increased educator pay, improved access to affordable health care, and fair opportunities for everyone in our communities and state.Thank you all for keeping people informed about the upcoming election and its potential impacts. As the election approaches and early voting begins soon, remember that a full and free democracy in the United States relies on active participation from all citizens.Ensuring that every voice is heard and every vote counts is vital."
Posted on Facebook, "Now, in a world where bigots, fascists, and the self-awareness-challenged are out here trying to project their issues onto the rest of us, staying true to yourself is practically a superpower."
"As District Judge for the 180th Criminal District Court in Harris County, Texas, I began my tenure on November 6, 2018, and secured a second term on November 8, 2022. I manage a caseload of 2,500 criminal matters and have presided over 60 trials. Prior to my judgeship, I was a trial lawyer specializing in civil rights, handling over 100 cases, including the 'Gaslamp' racial discrimination lawsuit and a Texas Whistleblower Act case. I have served in the U.S. Army JAG Corps since 2001, with the current rank of Lieutenant Colonel (LTC)." —DeSean Jones
Which Texas Supreme Court case do you believe to be the most important? Why?
"Working as a justice or judge is deeply rooted in the law and the facts, but crucially, it is a people-centered profession. Constantly making decisions that impact the lives of individuals, singling out a specific case as 'most important' could potentially marginalize others. All cases that reach the Texas Supreme Court are inherently significant, underscoring the importance of approaching each with fairness and impartiality. As judges, it is essential to remember that these matters are significant to the entire community of Texans, not just a select few."
—DeSean Jones
What inspired you to pursue a path of studying law?
"My initial interaction with a judge dates back to the 1980s, when my now-deceased mother used to watch a TV show called Night Court. Interestingly, that show has always stuck with me, along with other cherished moments spent with my mother. However, my genuine commitment to justice began to take root when, as a middle schooler returning from Germany due to my dad's military service, I encountered blatant racism for the first time. This stark experience, unusual among the Army bases I had previously visited, deeply impacted me during my formative years. After losing my mother on Valentine's Day following my second tour of duty in Iraq as a Field Artillery officer, the profound impact of her untimely passing became apparent. Determined to pursue my life's aspirations, acknowledging the uncertainty of tomorrow, I enrolled in law school. Since then, I have remained steadfast in my dedication to fairness and impartiality, all while striving to make my mother proud." —DeSean Jones
"In Texas, the constitutional rights of everyday citizens across the state are being attacked by individuals who espouse far-right ideologies and engage in extreme actions to promote their beliefs. The rule of law should not be confused for the preservation of conformist values, nationalism, or ethnocentrism. More importantly, they should not be clouded by anti-immigrant, anti-semitic, anti-black, or other caustic beliefs. The cornerstone of justice is fairness and impartiality. Diversity of experience and perspective is vital in order to ensure the law is applied with meaningful equity. Judge Jones has worked hard to ensure just treatment and fairness is applied to every person that enters the courtroom...As a Judge, he believes that "fair is fair" and the law must be applied as it is written and not adjusted or abated to support subjective interests. Financial status, connections, and other variables not available to everyone should not come into play in regard to the administration of justice. "—DeSean Jones
"DeSean Jones for Texas Supreme Court Place 2." The Official Face to Face Project, YouTube, September 26, 2024.
"As the great Ruth Bader Ginsburg once said, 'All I ask of our brethren is that they take their feet off our necks.' What that means to me is that we are currently in a time when people are using their power to put their foot on others' necks, holding them down and holding them back, putting them in difficult situations where they have to do things they would not normally have to do. This is a free country and a free people."—DeSean Jones
"The Texas Supreme Court's similar backgrounds raise concerns about fully representing the state's varied population. As Texas continues to change, the Court must ensure its rulings address all communities. Without broader representation, public trust and the Court's legitimacy could continue to decline. Different perspectives are essential for delivering fair and impartial decisions for all Texans."
QUESTIONNAIRE
RIGHT TO LIFE
Was Dobbs v. Jackson rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain.
Did not answer
I support a right to accelerate ending a human life.
Did not answer
Human life deserves legal protection from conception until natural death.
Did not answer
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
Religious liberty is at risk in the United States.
Did not answer
2ND AMENDMENT
The right to bear arms is fundamental and must be protected.
Did not answer
OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES
Which branch of government do you believe was intended to wield the most authority?
Did not answer
How should the court address public health and individual freedoms in the time of a public health emergency?
Did not answer
JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY
Which current or past U.S. Supreme Court justice best reflects your judicial philosophy?
Did not answer
Is there a separation of church and state in the Constitution? Please explain.
Did not answer
Should courts address threats to religious liberty in the United States? If so, how?
Did not answer
Was Obergefell v. Hodges rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain.
Did not answer
Was Bostock v. Clayton County rightly decided under the law? Please explain.
Did not answer
I agree that “the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder.” (Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65-66 (2000); quoting Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 (1944).
Did not answer
What should a judge do when legislative texts and court precedents dictate different results?
Did not answer
When should a judge overturn past court decisions?
Did not answer
When, if ever, should a judge take popular opinion or the social views of the majority into consideration?
Did not answer
Do you believe the meaning of the Constitution changes over time, absent changes through the amendment process of Article V?
Did not answer
What do you believe is the single most important quality a judge should possess?
Did not answer
If you are an incumbent judge, describe a recent instance in which you acted to preserve your judicial independence. If you are an aspiring judge, how do you plan to remain independent if elected to the bench?
Did not answer
ABOUT YOU
What, if any, church or organizations do you belong to?
Did not answer
I voted in these primaries and general elections:
Did not answer
Have you ever been convicted of a felony? If so, please explain.
Did not answer
Have you ever been penalized for sexual misconduct in either civil or criminal court? If so, please explain.
Did not answer
Would you describe your judicial philosophy as originalist, living constitutionalist, or something else? Please explain.
Did not answer
VALUES
Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.
Did not answer
What is your view of parental rights regarding the upbringing of children, specifically education and sexual "identity"?
Did not answer
I support "gender identity" as a specially protected class. Please explain.
Did not answer
What do you believe to be true about the human condition?
Did not answer
EQUALITY
I agree with Critical Race Theory (CRT).
Did not answer
If you are not already receiving our emails, stay up to date with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.