

Janet Claire Protasiewicz
Non-Partisan | Wisconsin
Candidate Profile*
Activist (Conditional)
BIOGRAPHY
Name
Janet Claire Protasiewicz
Party
Non-Partisan
Election Year
2023
Election
Supreme Court, Senate District 8, School District Primary
Race
Supreme Court
Incumbent
No
EDUCATION
Candidate did not provide
WORK & MILITARY
Candidate did not provide
AFFILIATIONS
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES HELD
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT
Candidate did not provide
Race
Previous Races
ENDORSEMENTS*
CONSERVATIVE (1)
Ken Skowronski
LIBERAL (13)
*Emily's List
Don Vruwink
Jonathan Brostoff
Kelda Roys
Lena Taylor
SELECTED CONTRIBUTIONS
LIBERAL
GIVEN BY CANDIDATE (2)
Evan Goyke (2013)
Tim Carpenter (2011)
RECEIVED BY CANDIDATE (13)
Amalgamated Transit Union (2013)
American Federation of Teachers (2013)
Chris Larson (2013)
Evan Goyke (2013)
Gwen Moore (2013)
OTHER INFORMATION
Judge Janet Protasiewicz worked as a Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge since 2014. Prior, she was a Milwaukee County Assistant District Attorney for 26 years. She graduated from University of Wisconsin Milwaukee with a degree in history and received her Juris Doctorate from Marquette Law School where she has also worked as adjunct professor.”
She stated she entered the election because “... I could not stand by and watch right-wing extremists take control of the state’s highest court.”
Judge Protasiewicz’ campaign website
Relevant Statements:
- “I’d say that in addition to independence, you bring your values to the court everyday,” she says. “You bring your values, values like your belief in democracy, which kind of leads me in the way that I philosophically think about gerrymandering and the maps. Philosophically, values leading me to believe that a woman’s right to make decisions over her own body should be just that, not made by the government but made by the person who’s ultimately being affected by them. I think on some of those hot button issues, I can certainly tell you what my values are.” said Protasiewicz.
- Stated “that in her court in Milwaukee, she’s always kept her focus on upholding the constitution and keeping the community safe.”
- “'For almost my entire life, the constitutional right to privacy has been settled law,' said Protasiewicz. 'We know that it’s not up to the government to decide who we can or can’t love[.]'"
Twitter:
- In regard to Dobbs she wrote“[t]oday’s opinion overturning Roe v. Wade and threatening all of the substantive due process freedoms won over the last century, is a political statement, not a legal one.”
- “She believes in fairness, in upholding the rule of law, and in protecting our legal system from the corrupt influence of right-wing special interest.” [Posted to Twitter January 4, 2023]
- She posted “Wisconsin faces some of the most pressing challenges in the struggle for reproductive freedom and election fairness, we need to elect a justice with the character and values to fairly interpret the law. I’m running to restore our Wisconsin values to our state's highest court.” [Twitter post on August 23, 2022]
Concerning: Pro-choice, in favor of gay marriage, stated that judges "bring their value to court everyday," refers to Justices Dorow and Kelly as rightwing extremists.
- Janet Claire Protasiewicz completed the League of Women Voters of Dane County Survey.
**Information discovered post-publish and not considered in evaluations.
QUESTIONNAIRE
VALUES
I agree with Critical Race Theory (CRT) which asserts that the institutions in the United States are fundamentally racist.
Did not answer
Judeo-Christian values established a framework of morality that is necessary for our system of limited government.
Did not answer
Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.
Did not answer
What types of pro bono work have you done?
Did not answer
ABOUT YOU
Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized in either civil or criminal court for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.
Did not answer
What education or experience qualifies you to hold the office for which you seek election?
Did not answer
Why should the voters choose you?
Did not answer
I voted in these primaries and general elections:
Did not answer
JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY
Justices should not interpret the federal and state constitutions as living documents, but should use a textualist and originalist approach to interpretation.
Did not answer
What is the proper use of legislative history in interpreting statutory law?
Did not answer
Which current or past U.S. Supreme Court justice best reflects your judicial philosophy?
Did not answer
How should a court address the balance between public health and individual freedoms in the time of a pandemic?
Did not answer
In light of the case Bostock v. Clayton County, in which the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include a prohibition on sexual-orientation discrimination, which justice’s opinion most closely aligns with your own opinion?
Did not answer
What role (if any) does a judge have in maintaining the separation of church and state?
Did not answer
Religious liberty is at risk in the United States and deserves the highest level of protection in the law.
Did not answer
When should a judge overturn past court decisions?
Did not answer
How should a judge determine which rights are protected by the Constitution even though they are not specifically mentioned?
Did not answer
What legal principles should a court consider when evaluating parents’ objection to their child obtaining medical procedures or drugs designed to affirm the child’s desired gender?
Did not answer
What principles should guide a court’s analysis of whether your state’s constitution gives terminally ill patients a right to assisted suicide?
Did not answer
Would you describe your judicial philosophy as originalist, living constitutionalist, or something else?
Did not answer
If you are not already receiving our emails, stay up to date with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.
Invest in America’s Future
Join the movement to restore biblical values and constitutional principles in our nation by informing and mobilizing more faith-based voters with the truth.