
Gary Nation
Constitution | Colorado
Candidate Profile
Leans Conservative
BIOGRAPHY
Name
Gary Nation
Party
Constitution
Election Year
2022
Election
General
Race
U.S. Rep., Dist. 2
Incumbent
No
Links
EDUCATION
SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY, CARBONDALE, BA, 1973
WORK & MILITARY
Candidate did not provide
AFFILIATIONS
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES HELD
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT
Candidate did not provide
Race
OTHER INFORMATION
QUESTIONNAIRE
RIGHT TO LIFE
Abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, should not receive funds from federal, state, or local governments (including Title X grants).
Agree
EXCEPT FOR INSTANCES OF RAPE, INCEST OR CATASTROPHIC GENETIC DEFECTS, WHERE THE SO-CALLED MORNING AFTER DRUG MEANT TO PREVENT FERTILIZATION HAS BEEN TRIED BUT NOT BEEN SUCCESSFUL. AS AN AMERICAN CONSTITUTION PARTY CANDIDATE I WOULD BE OPEN TO A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT INVOLVING SOME COMPROMISE [UP TO 12-15 WEEKS SEEMS TO BE THE LATEST THRESHOLDS DEBATED] AS IT WOULD END THE BARBARITY OF LATER TERM ABORTIONS NATIONWIDE.
I support 'aid in dying' laws which legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia.
Neutral
A FEW YEARS AGO I WOULD HAVE SAID "AGREE" BUT NOW I'M MORE AMBIVALENT AFTER SEEING THE SLIPPERY SLOPE EFFECTS IN SOME COUNTRIES THAT HAVE ADOPTED THIS, ESPECIALLY CANADA.
Under what circumstances should abortion be allowed?
IF CONTRACEPTIVES, INCLUDING THE EMERGENCY CONTRACEPTIVE DRUG LEVONORGESTREL, WERE MADE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE, I'D PREFER LIMITING ABORTION TO CASES OF RAPE, INCEST OR CATASTROPHIC GENETIC DEFECTS. AS ABORTION IS PERHAPS THE MOST DIVISIVE ISSUE IN AMERICA, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE A CONCENSUS REACHED ON A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
ECONOMY
Redistribution of income is needed to lessen the gap between the wealthy and working classes.
Disagree
I'D RATHER SEE THE CURRENT INCOME TAX SYSTEM, WHICH HAS BEEN AMENDED OVER THE YEARS TO OVERWELMINGLY FAVOR THE SUPER WEALTHY AND LARGE CORPORATIONS, REPLACED WITH A FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS TAX, SIMILAR TO A NATIONAL SALES TAX BUT ON BOTH GOODS AND SERVICES.
The government should cut spending in order to reduce the national debt.
Agree
HOWEVER, NOT BY ACROSS-THE-BOARD CUTS, BUT BY TARGETING NON-CORE GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS, SUCH AS FOREIGN AID AND MILITARY CONFLICTS NOT INVOLVING DIRECT NATIONAL SECURITY, WHILE MAINTAINING ESSENTIAL SERVICES LIKE INFRASTRUCTURE AND BORDER SECURITY.
What changes, if any, should be made to the tax code?
DO AWAY WITH THE NATIONAL INCOME TAX [16TH AMENDMENT] AND REPLACE IT WITH A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ESTABLISHING A FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS TAX, SIMILAR TO A SALES TAX BUT ON GOODS AND SERVICES, WITH ONLY LIMITED, SPECIFIED EXEMPTIONS FOR SUCH THINGS AS FOOD, MEDICAL CARE, AND PERSONALINDIVIDUAL SAVINGS ACCOUNTS.
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
Religious liberty is at risk in the United States and deserves the highest level of protection in the law.
Strongly Agree
NO ONE SHOULD BE COERCED, LET ALONE FORCED, TO ENGAGE IN ANY ACTIVITY AGAINST THEIR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS, NOR HAVE THEIR FREE SPEECH RIGHTS THREATENED WITH THE LOSS OF THEIR JOB.
Individuals and businesses should be required to provide services even if it would violate their moral and/or religious beliefs.
Strongly Disagree
I CERTAINLY DISAGREE WITH REQUIRING INDIVIDUALS AND PRIVATELY HELD BUSINESSES TO GO AGAINST THEIR BELIEFS. I DO AGREE THAT BUSINESSES INVOLVED IN PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION [RESTAURANTS, BAKERIES, HOTELS, ETC] ARE A UNIQUE SITUATION. NEEDING TO SERVE ESSENTUALLY ANONYMOUS WALK-INS IS QUITE DIFFERENT THAN BEING REQUIRED TO GO AGAINST ONE'S BELIEFS. SO, WHILE AN INNKEEPER MAY BE REQUIRED TO SERVE INDIVIDUAL CUSTOMERS, THEY SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO HOST A CONVENTION OF, SAY, SATANISTS.
What should be the relationship between the church and the state?
AS A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC, OUR FIRST AMENDMENT APPLIES: CONGRESS CANNOT MAKE LAWS ESTABLISHING/REQUIRING RELIGIOUS PRACTICE, BUT ALSO CANNOT PROHIBIT THE FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION. THEREFORE, STUDENTS HAVE THE RIGHT TO PRAY IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS, AND THE RIGHT TO HAVE AND JOIN IN RELIGIOUS ORIENTED CLUBS. PRIVATE RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS HAVE THE RIGHT TO TEACH THEIR BELIEFS, AND TO HIRE ONLY THOSE WHO SUPPORT THOSE BELIEFS.
HEALTHCARE
Under what circumstances (if any) should a government, school, or employer be allowed to require vaccinations?
I THINK THAT VACCINATIONS SHOULD ONLY BE REQUIRED UNDER EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES, OR WITH LONGSTANDING EVIDENCE OF EFFICACY AND SAFETY. THAT SAID, PUBLIC EDUCATION IS NOT JUST PROVIDED IN THE U.S. BUT LEGALLY REQUIRED BY ALL STATES. IT IS BASICALLY A RIGHT AND CANNOT BE DENIED. PARENTS SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO OPT OUT THEIR CHILDREN FROM VACCINATION, BUT THEN THE SCHOOL DISTRICT MUST MAKE AN ACCOMMODATION TO THAT CHOICE, PERHAPS BY VOUCHER TO COVER THE COST OF IN HOME INSTRUCTION, CHARTER SCHOOL OR PRIVATE SCHOOL.
What most closely matches your view on healthcare: A) Healthcare for all should be guaranteed and funded by the government with no private healthcare option. (includes "universal healthcare," "medicare for all," etc.) B) Healthcare insurance funded by the government should be available for all who want it, along with private healthcare options. C) Medicaid and Medicare should remain available, but no other taxpayer-funded programs are necessary. D)Tax-payer funded health care should be abolished in all forms, and Medicaid and Medicare should be de-funded.
C, I SUPPOSE. BUT I ALSO SUPPORT EXTENDING UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE TO COVER COBRA BENEFITS. COBRA ALLOWS THOSE WHO LOSE THEIR EMPLOYMENT-RELATED HEALTH BENEFITS TO EXTEND COVERAGE SO LONG AS THEY PAY BOTH EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE SHARES. OFTEN THE COBRA OPTION IS TOO EXPENSIVE FOR INDIVIDUALS AND SO THEY OPT NOT TO USE IT. UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE IS PRETTY MUCH SELF FUNDED [THOUGH GOVERNMENT ADMINISTERED] SO COVERING COBRA PAYMENTS WOULD NOT DRIVE UP GOVERNMENT COSTS. I WOULD ALSO SUPPORT REQUIRING HEALTH PROVIDERS TO SET THEIR MAXIMUM PRIVATE PAY RATES, BILLED TO THOSE WITHOUT INSURANCE, TO SOME SMALL PERCENTAGE ABOVE WHAT THEY ACCEPT FROM PRIVATE INSURANCE.
NATIONAL SECURITY
With regard to America's foreign policy, which view most closely resembles yours: A) The United States should intervene whenever freedom is threatened. B) The United States should selectively help countries trying to grow democracy and fight tyranny. C) The United States has become too involved in others' policies and should remain focused on issues regarding our own sovereignty unless in imminent danger. D) The United States should stay out of foreign conflicts completely.
C. WE SHOULD DEFINITELY NOT BE IN THE SO-CALLED NATION BUILDING BUSINESS, ESPECIALLY WHERE OUR DIRECT NATIONAL SECURITY IS NOT INVOLVED, SUCH AS UKRAINE. EASTERN UKRAINE HAS AN ETHNIC RUSSIAN, AND LARGELY RUSSIAN SPEAKING, POPULATION. A BETTER SOLUTION THAN WAR WOULD BE TO LET THE EASTERN PORTION VOTE ON WHETHER TO REMAIN PART OF UNRAINE OR BECOME INDEPENDENT OR JOIN RUSSIA.
I support the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement to pressure Israel to withdraw from occupied territories, remove the separation barrier in the West Bank, allow full equality for Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel, and promote the rights of Palestinian refugees.
Strongly Disagree
ISRAEL'S ARAB CITIZENS ALREADY HAVE RIGHTS. THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE, TO OWN PROPERTY, TO HOLD OFFICE AND THEY EVEN SERVE ON ISRAEL'S HIGHEST COURT. AS A SOVEREIGN NATION, ISRAEL HAS THE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE MATTERS OF BORDERS AND SECURITY WITH THEIR NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES, SOME OF WHOM ARE HOSTILE AND HAVE CALLED FOR ISRAEL'S ANNIHILATION.
The Chinese Communist Party poses serious military, cyber security, intellectual property, and global economic threats to the United States.
Strongly Agree
FURTHER, THEY'VE DEMONSTRATED THEY DO NOT UPHOLD NEGOTIATED AGREEMENTS. FOR EXAMPLE, THEY VIOLATED THE AGREEMENT FOR HONG KONG TO HAVE SELF-RULE AUTONOMY FOR 50 YEARS AFTER ENGLAND'S WITHDRAWAL.
What should the United States do to help eradicate the threat of Islamic terrorism?
THE US SHOULD MAINTAIN STRONG ECONOMIC SANCTIONS ON IRAN AND OTHER SUPPORTERS OF ISLAMIC TERRORISM, WHILE CONTINUING TO SUPPORT THOSE ISLAMIC COUNTRIES DENOUNCING TERRORISM AND NORMALIZING RELATIONS WITH THE WEST, ESPECIALLY ISRAEL. PRESIDENT TRUMP'S ABRAHAM ACCORDS, AND MOVING OUR EMBASSY TO JERUSALEM, REPRESENTED PROGRESS IN THE MIDDLE EAST. UNDER THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION THE MIDDLE EAST SITUATION HAS DRAMATICALLY WORSENED WITH THE WEAKENING OF SANCTIONS ON IRAN AND THE DISASTEROUS WITHDRAWAL FROM AFGHANISTAN, THAT RE-ARMED THE TALIBAN.
IMMIGRATION
The U.S. should do more to physically secure the southern border.
Strongly Agree
DRUGS, SEX TRAFFICKING, VIOLENT CRIME ALL HAVE WORSENED WITH LAX BORDER SECURITY. IT'S FAR HARDER TO CATCH CRIMINALS, TERRORISTS, AND DRUG SMUGGLERS WITHIN A FLOOD OF ILLEGAL BORDER CROSSERS THAN WHEN THE BORDER IS SECURE. ALSO, STRICTER DEPORTATION POLICIES WOULD HELP DETER ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.
State and federal funds shall be denied to any public or private entity, such as a sanctuary city, that is not in compliance with immigration laws.
Neutral
I WOULD SUPPORT WITHHOLDING FEDERAL FUNDS SUPPORTING SANCTUARY ACTIVITIES BUT WOULD NOT WANT TO RESTRICT FUNDING GOING TO CITIZENS FOR LEGITIMATE NEEDS AND AVAILABLE TO OTHERS NOT RESIDING IN SANCTUARY CITIES. FOR EXAMPLE, I WOULDN'T WITHHOLD MATCHING FEDERAL FUNDS FOR CITIZENS ON MEDICAID PROGRAMS, BUT WOULD WITHHOLD FUNDING FOR EXTENDING THOSE PROGRAMS TO ILLEGAL ALIENS.
Who should be allowed to immigrate to the U.S. and under what circumstances?
I AM IN SUPPORT OF A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT THAT WOULD ELIMINATE AUTOMATIC CITIZENSHIP TO THOSE BORN HERE ILLEGALLY, AND THE USE OF "ANCHOR BABIES" FOR CHAIN MIGRATION. TO MAKE THAT AMENDMENT A REALITY, I WOULD AGREE TO A COMPROMISE GRANTING CITIZENSHIP TO THOSE NOW YOUNG ADULTS WHO WERE PREVIOUSLY BROUGHT HERE ILLEGALLY AT A YOUNG AGE, SO LONG AS THEY HAVE NO CRIMINAL HISTORY. OTHERWISE, I FAVOR AN IMMIGRATION POLICY SIMILAR TO CANADA'S, BASING IMMIGRATION ON NATIONAL NEEDS FOR CERTAIN SKILLS AND TRADES.
VALUES
Sexual orientation and gender identity should be protected classes in non-discrimination laws.
Neutral
iVoterGuide Notes:
Staff note: After evaluations occurred, candidate notified iVoterGuide that the intended answer to this question should have been: GENERALLY, I DISAGREE WITH REQUIRING INDIVIDUALS AND PRIVATELY HELD BUSINESSES TO GO AGAINST THEIR BELIEFS. HOWEVER, I DO NOT OPPOSE REQUIRING BUSINESSES INVOLVED IN PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION [RESTAURANTS, HOTELS, ETC] TO SERVE ALL COMERS WHO ARE, AFTER ALL, ESSENTIALLY ANONYMOUS WALK-INS. THUS, FOR EXAMPLE, A BAKERY WOULD NEED TO SELL READY-MADE GOODS TO ALL WHO COME IN; BUT SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO PREPARE A CUSTOM CAKE WITH DECORATION OR WRITING THE BAKER FINDS IN CONFLICT WITH HER/HIS MORALS, BELIEFS OR RELIGION.
ALSO, CHURCHES, RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS, AND THE LIKE SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO HIRE OR ADMIT THOSE WHO BELIEFS ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THEIR TEACHINGS OR TENETS. I ALSO OPPOSE TRANSGENDER INDIVIDUALS COMPETING IN WOMEN'S SPORTS, AS IT DENIES WOMEN HARD WON OPPORTUNITIES GAINED THROUGH TITLE IX EQUAL RIGHTS LEGISLATION. CONSIDERATION SHOULD INSTEAD BE GIVEN TO ESTABLISHING A DISTINCT CLASSIFICATION FOR TRANSGENDERED TO COMPETE WITHIN.
I agree with Critical Race Theory (CRT) which asserts that the institutions in the United States are fundamentally racist.
Disagree
I'M OLD ENOUGH TO KNOW WHAT TRULY SYSTEMIC RACISM INVOLVED, PRIOR TO THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS: DENIAL OF VOTING RIGHTS VIA POLL TAXES; SEPARATE PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS; SEPARATE BUT UNEQUAL SCHOOLS; DEMOCRAT GOVERNORS VEHEMENTLY OPPOSING DESEGREGATION; LEGAL PROHIBITIONS ON INTER-RACIAL MARRIAGE. IN 1967 44.5% OF BLACK HOUSEHOLDS WERE LOW INCOME, AND ONLY 9.1% HIGH INCOME; BUT BY 2019 THE NUMBERS WERE 28.7% AND 29.4%, RESPECTIVELY. 2000: 1.5 MILLION BLACKS IN COLLEGE; 2019 2.45 MILLION IN COLLEGE.
Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.
I BELIEVE THAT GOVERNMENT EXISTS TO PROTECT AND SERVE THE PUBLIC, AND THAT A WRITTEN CONSTITUTION IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A REPRESENTATIVE REPUBLIC. I BELIEVE IT WAS A MISTAKE TO ABANDON THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ROUTE, AND THE CONCENSUS BUILDING IT REQUIRES, FOR RESOLVING OUR DIFFERENCES. I BECAME A STRICT CONSTRUCTIONIST AFTER THE CITY OF NEW LONDON VS KELO SUPREME COURT DECISION.
ELECTIONS AND VOTING
People should be able to vote without photo identification.
Strongly Disagree
PHOTO ID FOR IN-PERSON VOTING. I'M OPPOSED TO WHOLESALE VOTING BY MAIL, BUT WHERE IT'S ALLOWED THERE MUST BE SAFEGUARDS LIKE SIGNATURE VERIFICATION.
What laws would you propose to change present voting practices?
I'D PROPOSE MANDATING ROUTINE AUDITING OF EVERY ELECTION. NEITHER PARTY SHOULD OPPOSE AN AUDIT IF THEY BELIEVE IN VOTING INTEGRITY. I BELIEVE EVERY ELECTIVE OFFICE ON THE BALLOT SHOULD HAVE A "NONE OF THE ABOVE" OPTION. I BELIEVE IN STRICTLY MAINTAINED VOTER REGISTRATION ROLLS, AND THAT JUST AS VOTERS CAN GO ONLINE AND CHANGE THEIR VOTER REGISTRATION INFO, THAT THEY SHOULD ALSO BE ABLE TO UPDATE THEIR INFO AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THEY VOTED IN AN ELECTION, FOR USE IN AN AUDIT.
EQUALITY
Reparations should be given to people on the basis of race.
Neutral
THE SUGGESTION IS TOO VAGUE FOR A SERIOUS DISCUSSION AT THE MOMENT. REPARATIONS FOR WHO? JUST DIRECT DESCENDANTS OF SLAVES? OR, JUST TO THOSE DESCENDANTS IN POVERTY? AND HOW DO YOU COME TO A DOLLAR AMOUNT? IS CREDIT GIVEN FOR SOCIETY'S PAST EFFORTS IN REDUCING RACIAL INEQUALITY? SHOULD REPARATIONS PERHAPS BETTER BE REQUESTED OF BRITAIN, AS THE UNITED STATES DIDN'T EXIST WHEN THE SLAVE TRADE WAS BROUGHT TO THE AMERICAS?
Is racism a threat to domestic security in the United States? Why or why not?
SORRY, I'M NOT SURE WHAT YOU MEAN BY DOMESTIC SECURITY. RACIAL BITTERNESS CAN CERTAINLY LEAD SOME TO VIOLENCE, AFFECTING PERSONAL SAFETY.
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
I support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources.
Agree
AND I SUPPORT POLICIES THAT INSURE ENERGY INDEPENDENCE; AND I OPPOSE THE DRAWING DOWN OF THE STRATEGIC OIL RESERVES DURING NON-EMERGENCY TIMES, AS IS CURRENTLY BEING DONE.
Which comes closest to your view? A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. B) Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost.
A. I'M IN FAVOR OF REASONABLE ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, BUT CONCERNED ABOUT THE TENDENCY OF A NON-ELECTED BUREACRACY TO EXTEND REGULATION BEYOND THAT AUTHORIZED BY OUR ELECTED CONGRESS, CIRCUMVENTING THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.
ABOUT YOU
When you consider your views on a wide range of issues from economic and social matters to foreign policy and religious liberty, which of the following best describes you overall?
Lean Conservative
I'M A CONSTITUTIONIST, WHICH IS DIFFERENT FROM A CONSERVATIVE. I SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS ON FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, WITH GREATER POWER GOING TO THE STATES AND THE PEOPLE. THIS GENERALLY ALIGNS WITH CONSERVATIVES, THOUGH LATELY LIBERALS [DEMOCRATS] HAVE BEEN QUICK TO EMBRACE "STATES' RIGHTS" TOO, WHENEVER OUT OF POWER AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL.
Please provide publicly available information, including interviews and media reports, validating your answer to the previous question (other than your website).
I'VE NOT RUN FOR OFFICE BEFORE, SO I HAVE NO RECORD TO RUN ON. I HAVE BEEN A MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION PARTY OF COLORADO SINCE 2019, WHICH IS VERIFIABLE ONLINE.
Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized in either civil or criminal court for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.
NO.
What else would you like voters to know about you, including your legislative priorities?
MINIMIZE CORRUPTION by keeping federal government as small and lean as possible, reducing incentives for graft. REPEAL THE SIXTEENTH AMENDMENT, the national income tax, thus eliminating exemptions and tax credits which disproportionately go to the wealthy. ADOPT A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ESTABLISHING A NATIONAL FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS TAX, essentially a broad national sales tax [on goods and services] INSTITUTE A NATIONAL USURY LAW prohibiting banks offering credit cards with exorbitant interest rates that snare people, especially the poor and young, into debt traps they cannot escape. REQUIRE BANKS TO SET MINIMUM PERSONAL SAVINGS ACCOUNT INTEREST RATES TO A BENCHMARK such as the 5-year govt bond. MANDATE NATIONAL ENERGY INDEPENDENCE, removing barriers to oil & gas production until such time as there is sufficient alternative energy capacity; and afterwards maintaining sufficient production necessary for national security. SECURE THE BORDER, REDUCING DRUG DEATHS AND INSURING TERRORISTS OR THOSE WITH CRIMINAL RECORDS ARE NOT ALLOWED INTO THE COUNTRY, while simultaneously seeking a Constitutional Amendment compromise on the citizenship issue of those now young adults brought here illegally at a young age. ALLOW STUDENT DEBT TO BE DISCHARGED IN BANKRUPTCY, like every other debt can. RETURN NUCLEAR POWER TO THE ENERGY MIX, a clean base-load power source entailing less environmental degradation than the mining associated with solar panels and batteries, for instance.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE & PUBLIC SAFETY
Police officers should be personally immune from prosecution for conduct consistent with departmental policy (qualified immunity) while on duty.
Agree
I support redirecting funds from police departments to mental health and community programs.
Disagree
BUT, I SUPPORT ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING FOR NON-VIOLENT OFFENDERS, AND MENTAL HEALTH TREATMENT FOR DRUG ABUSERS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO INCARCERATION
2ND AMENDMENT
What restrictions on gun ownership are needed to protect public safety?
I SUPPORT THE CURRENT RESTRICTIONS GENERALLY APPLIED BY MOST STATES, PROHIBITING GUN OWNERSHIP BY FELONS, THE MENTALLY INCOMPETENT, AND THOSE WITH A HISTORY OF DOMESTIC ABUSE. OTHERWISE, I SUPPORT GUN OWNERSHIP AS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. I OPPOSE MOST LIMITS ON GUN MAGAZINE CAPACITY. I SUPPORT THE RECOGNITION OF CONCEALED CARRY LICENSES BY ALL STATES.
Victims of gun violence should be able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers.
Strongly Disagree
If you are not already receiving our emails, stay up to date with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.
Invest in America’s Future
Join the movement to restore biblical values and constitutional principles in our nation by informing and mobilizing more faith-based voters with the truth.