Christopher Proia

That decision should be between left up to the pregnant person and their doctor. Abortion laws only affect the bottom 90% Americans because the rest can afford to fly elsewhere and get the treatment they need. It is a direct assault upon the upwards mobility of the working class and is therefore Un-American.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

A progressive style tax rate is the only way to properly grow the economy. When the lower and middle classes are able to afford a decent life, that's when we'll see a return to the American dream. And don't worry, the rich will still be rich ;-)

I would change the focus of our police and military from unnecessary aggressive enforcement to positive community service. Once the rich are more fairly taxed and the bottom 99% can afford to live, the budget will balance.

Strongly Agree

Disagree

Small businesses and self employed individuals shouldn't have to be forced to do anything they don't want to. However, I feel like a business that wants to grow would be better served to appeal to a more broader audience. This is more of a case by case situation rather than a broad general question.

I don't believe under current law that they can unless the people at the church are violating some other law. If you're asking when should government be allowed to close churches, then I would say under repeat violations of the situation of church and state. Religion has no business in a modern day democratic-republic. The elected officials should be voting in the manner their people would like them to vote, regardless of what any faith compels them to do.

100% A. 22 different studies have shown Medicare-for-All not only would reduce the cost of American healthcare but would DRASTICALLY improve the lives of millions of Americans. Again, the upwards mobility of the bottom 99% of Americans is directly harmed by not having this system in place.

When the health of everyone around is directly affected. We already require vaccines for public schooling. It is a safe system we have currently and I would see it continue.

Same thing it should do to eradicate the threat of Christian, Jewish, and any other terrorism. We should be prepared to eliminate any and all threats of violence against citizens of the U.S.

Strongly Agree

We need to help end the violence and let people live peacefully, as long as they're letting others live peacefully

Strongly Disagree

Most illegal immigrants come here legally and over stay their Visa. A physical border won't stop that.

I believe anyone without a ciminal record that is willing to work and live peacefully should be welcomed with open arms. We are a nation of immigrants and we should remain that way.

Disagree

Allowing unqualified teachers to only teach one side of a story is the downfall to education. We need to strengthen our public schools and make sure that students learn all sides of every story

Strongly Disagree

Our government was founded as a secular nation and should remain that way. Separation of church and state is what got us to the top and quite frankly the erosion of the wall between church and state is a part of the reason we're so divided today.

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Choose not to answer

I have never studied CRT since it is a college law course and I am not a lawyer. However, if you're offended by somebody calling you a racist... you're probably a racist. If I was called anything I knew I wasn't, I would simply shrug my shoulders and go about my day.

I am a Secular Humanist. I believe in Integrity, Responsibility, and the Pursuit of Happiness (so long as you're not harming anyone or anything)

Strongly Disagree

I'm personally a fan of Ranked Choice Voting. Our elections are among the most secure elections and I'll do what it takes to keep them that way.

Did not answer

Strongly Disagree

If the bottom 99% were able to afford to survive again, than the system will start to balance the disparity between the races all on its own. Our focus should be on repairing the income inequality problem.

B. We have to be mindful of the resources we're lucky to have.

Strongly Disagree

Solar and wind are better choices for the planet. I'm fairly neutral in nuclear but if we can make it safe, then I'm all for that as well.

The general purpose of government is not only to secure its populace but to improve the general well being of the population while not infringing upon basic human rights.

Very Liberal

Well, I'm new in politics so you'll just have to take my word for it ;-)

No

I'm your typical, every-day average American. My grandfather was my hero growing up, he taught me all about the American dream. I work hard, currently I have 4 different jobs. I'm a blue collar 18-wheel truck driver. I take care of my mother, who's disabled and can't walk. I do stand-up comedy because it's a fun passion of mine and I enjoy the night life. And now I'm running for office, because this is a serious passion of mine and I believe that we, as a nation can do better. 50 years of voodoo economics (trickle-down economics) have failed our working class. We can and must do better. Anything beyond this is simply a distraction. Fixing the income inequality is my #1 personal goal in office. I believe in all humans having equal rights. I believe in having as much personal freedom as you want, as long as you're not harming anyone else. I believe that we all do better when we're all doing better, and for the last 50 years, only the top 1% has been doing better. It's time for that to change.

Strongly Disagree

Strongly Agree

I think it should be about equal to car ownership. Our constitution clearly says "well regulated". I feel like if you want something that deadly (like a car) you should be trained on how to use it (like a car) e.t.c... I wouldn't even mind if at the age of reason (21-25) we afforded everyone who is mentally capable and willing, a basic rifle and a training class.

Neutral

This is a case by case question