David Eibeck

The states should determine when a child's life begins, not the federal government. I believe life begins at conception, and every life is precious. The mother should decide if the choice is between the mother's life or the child's. When a mother chooses to end the life of the unborn, not every circumstance is equal. I believe each event deserves a measure of due process to determine to which degree the action of taking a life is measured. I think the states should determine when the unborn enjoy the due process and determine the degree of the crime such due process affords.

Strongly Agree

Since ending the life of the unborn is a faith-based assertion, the government should not become a participant in the process.

Strongly Disagree

Life is precious from conception to death, and creating legal precedence to end it will leave society with the law of unintended circumstances.

End progressive tax rates that only punish success. Simplify the tax laws. End tax laws that target special interests.

The secret inside our public sector institutions is the "5-percent rule". As a result, 80% of a given institution's budget is spent on 5% of those the institution serves. This generality applies to police, fire, public schools, and healthcare. Identify the root causes and work towards solutions that create independence, ending the cycle of dependency upon public sector institutions.

Strongly Disagree

Not every American goes to college, and those Americans should not become enslaved by another American's choice. The argument is that college education makes our nation more robust, which is why it should become another welfare program. Unfortunately, the evidence that subsidized learning makes America stronger is scant compared to the debt and costs it creates for future Americans who will have to pay for it. A promise of Nirvana for a sacrifice today is the rallying call for all tyrants.

Strongly Disagree

There is always a "what-if." However, in general terms, individuals forced to become accountable for someone else's beliefs is a double-edged sword. Morality and religion in America are wildly subjective and faith-based. The government must steer clear of becoming a "god" regarding ideas. The government's role is the arbiter of justice restrained by objective reality, not religious zealotry.

A church is a 501-C entity and should be treated like all 501-C entities. If we create laws targeting churches but allow unions, which are also 501-C entities, to preach their message, we have created a "god." The question is poorly written because it effectively marginalizes churches versus any 501-C entity. Equality under the law becomes circumspect when we fail to be restrained by objective standards from which all law takes precedence.

D. However, it will take decades to change the culture of dependency welfare in America has created. We can't stop taxpayer-funded healthcare, and we must consider the military, police, fire, and others harmed on duty. The mission, over time, is to reduce dependency upon the public sector, building a solid and independent nation

By any reasonable measures, the government, schools, and employers require specific standards to be met by individuals they have authority over. There are codes of conduct, dress codes, and hygiene. The key word here is reasonable. Is it reasonable for the military to require its soldiers to get vaccinated? The answer is yes and no because the keyword is reasonable. Living independently with liberty is forever an endeavor founded upon reason; it is the essence of being human.

First, stop bombing Islamic nations in the name of the "petro-dollar." Second, enforce immigration laws, ensuring terrorists can't just walk back and forth across our borders. Third, become energy independent, lessening our military footprint in the Middle East.

Strongly Disagree

The conflict in Israel is about who controls Jerusalem, and the Palestinians are caught in the middle. If Israel concedes its territory now, then its destruction is inevitable. Israel and the United States both enjoy the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. If America turns it back on Israel, it will be us one day, defending our right to exist.

Strongly Agree

Our borders are sacrosanct and demand enforcement; without a border, we become something we are not. And that something is lawlessness.

Immigration to the United States should be based on a merit system; anything other than a merit system demands a personal sacrifice, an assault on our liberty.

Strongly Agree

It is unreasonable to force a parent to send their child to a school that does not meet that child's needs. Parents should enjoy the liberty to choose how their children are taught. Unfortunately, public schools are a place where success is more often than not traded for failure. Public schools, not unlike the institution of slavery of the past, build upon the sacrifice of others. It is time America broke the chains.

Neutral

The term Judeo-Christian has become a pejorative in America, and in a sense, this question has become a trap. The limited government depends upon a commitment to restraint, restraining the government's authority over the individual. Hence, the Bill of Rights and its essence: what can't be done to you versus what can be done for you; the tyrant wants to persuade you into believing what he can do for you. It is folly.

Strongly Disagree

If I were to support such fallacious nonsense, it would not be for gender identity. I can invent many groups of individuals facing far more significant problems than gender identity. One group of Americans facing discrimination and hatefulness is the obese. If we numbered obese Americans and Americans with gender identity challenges, obese Americans would outnumber those with gender identity challenges 25000 to 1. America needs to wake up to identity politics and how it weakens us.

Neutral

Marriage is a contract between consenting adults, and "God-ordained" is a slippery slope. The role of the government is as an arbiter of the law, contract law. Law is a function of precedence restrained by objective reality.

Strongly Disagree

CRT is an invented narrative to divide Americans further and weaken the nation. Institutions possess no agency, they have no will. And the most important institutions in America are under the auspices of Progressive Americans, the inventors of CRT. The heart and soul of these "racist" institutions are the inventors of CRT.

I believe human beings are eternal, precious, and possess natural authority.

Strongly Disagree

Voting is sacred because it seeks to bind another individual to your beliefs. I can't think of anything more significant than that requiring proof of identity.

Every voter should be able to determine if their ballot was counted. The process should involve two separate third-party entities tabulating the exact results and validated by the voter after tabulations. Encryption keys would ensure voter privacy.

The threat to domestic security is invented narratives like CRT, lawlessness, and media complicity.

Strongly Disagree

Reparations are most certainly the weakest endeavor at mass formation hypnosis facing Americans. Since many of even the "whitest" Americans are mixed race, how would you divide the loot? Wake up and understand that concepts like reparations are borne through "community organizers," working behind the scenes to weaken America.

A. There are groups in America working to make our country energy-dependent. Don't be fooled; these groups are very well funded and powerful and have insidiously infiltrated our communities. The environment demands protection and respect. Regulations and laws are needed to protect our natural resources and the environment.

Strongly Agree

It is reasonable if fracking can be done responsibly and without harming the environment.

To defend individual rights.

Very Conservative

My views are always restrained by individual rights, believing all individuals possess natural authority.

NA

No.

I have spent thirty-plus years in the private sector and have learned how to maintain long-term relationships with my employees and customers. My views are conservative, but I am a pragmatist; I understand that change takes time and can work effectively with all legislature members.

Strongly Agree

Strongly Disagree

Based on the evidence we discovered in school shootings, anti-depressants, guns, and young men do not mix well. Perhaps the restrictions should be on those dispensing drugs that separate the mind from reality.

Strongly Disagree

Victims of "drug" violence should be able to sue pharmaceutical companies? Victims of "knife" violence should be to sue the cutlery companies? Victims of "car" violence can sue the car companies? Equality under the law becomes circumspect.