
Alex Jafre
Republican | Alaska
Candidate Profile
Leans Conservative
BIOGRAPHY
Name
Alex Jafre
Party
Republican
Election Year
2022
Election
General
Race
State Senator, Dist. P
Incumbent
No
EDUCATION
B.E.S.T/Ravens education, Fairbanks, High school, 2012
WORK & MILITARY
Candidate did not provide
AFFILIATIONS
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES HELD
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT
Candidate did not provide
Race
OTHER INFORMATION
QUESTIONNAIRE
RIGHT TO LIFE
Under what circumstances should abortion be allowed?
None whatsoever it's morally unacceptable .
Abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, should not receive funds from federal, state, or local governments (including Title X grants).
Strongly Agree
There are no moral or ethical grounds to allow abortion much less fund it.
I support 'aid in dying' laws which legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia.
Strongly Disagree
No matter how it's phrased "right to die" is just a colorful way of saying murder.Furthermore it never stays voluntarily once you give the state that level of power it will be abused.
ECONOMY
What changes, if any, should be made to the tax code?
I believe in the implementation of a flat tax and the elimination of the ridiculous over complicated tax system currently in place.
What government spending would you reduce in order to balance the budget?
Elimination of public sector Unions, needless government subsidies, stoping mandatory pay increases for government officials and reducing spending over all.
Taxpayer-funded public education should be guaranteed through college.
Strongly Disagree
It could be argued that based on the uselessness of most fields people are studying these days in college that with the Minimal chance of potential benefit that occurs that it's not worth the investment. But the best argument against it is that post high school education is strictly elective and therefore not the taxpayers responsibility.
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
Individuals and businesses should be required to provide services even if it would violate their moral and/or religious beliefs.
Strongly Disagree
Under no circumstances does an individual's immoral lifestyle choices impose upon someone else a duty to endorse,support or participate in something that violates the natural law.eg abortion same sex "adoption" or "marriage".
Under what circumstances can government close churches?
If it were some kind of a brainwashing pagan/satanic murder and or sex cult. If it were involved Human trafficking appointed a known child rapist to a position of authority. I suppose if a plague were to strike. The constitution puts severe restrictions on government giving orders to Churches so the cause would need to be pretty severe to justify involvement under the law. Saying "mean" things,hurting entitled peoples feelings and burning rainbow flags would not only be protected but encouraged by our founders.
HEALTHCARE
What most closely matches your view on healthcare: A) Healthcare for all should be guaranteed and funded by the government with no private healthcare option. (includes "universal healthcare," "medicare for all," etc.) B) Healthcare insurance funded by the government should be available for all who want it, along with private healthcare options. C) Medicaid and Medicare should remain available, but no other taxpayer-funded programs are necessary. D)Tax-payer funded health care should be abolished in all forms, and Medicaid and Medicare should be de-funded.
C) Medicaid and Medicare should remain available, but no other taxpayer-funded programs are necessary And their still needs to be massive reform on what they cover.
Under what circumstances (if any) should a government, school, or employer be allowed to require vaccinations?
Well military service is one situation obviously, a private business has the right to do so outright if you don't like it then work someone else Or don't shop there. If you don't want to be around people not taking precautions then don't go to those business which aren't doing anything. I'm not going to vote hold you at gun point and say you must get vaccinated or mandate business require it.However I will not strip a business owner of his rights to run his business how he sees fit, nor strip him of the power to impose safety measures he and his costumers want. Medical choice doesn't mean you get to impose your desires to not do something regarding covid on those who want to take precautions.
NATIONAL SECURITY
What should the United States do to help eradicate the threat of Islamic terrorism?
Migration control, avoiding unnecessary military entanglements over seas eg Libya and Syria,no longer being Israel's errand boy and allowing them to support the disarmament of the American people while we waste millions of dollars sending them military supplies.
I support the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement to pressure Israel to withdraw from occupied territories, remove the separation barrier in the West Bank, allow full equality for Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel, and promote the rights of Palestinian refugees.
Neutral
Neither side of that conflict has a legitimate claim to the holy land.While I certainly would support avoiding funding Israel and ending foreign aid in general.The jumbled up reasons that Campain gives make formal support for it difficult if not impossible. They aren't opposing the errors, sabotaging of our rights or the liberalism of that nation but claiming it's to socially conservative. Which to anyone who has been looking into this problem is a downright ridiculous claim.
IMMIGRATION
The U.S. should do more to physically secure the southern border.
Strongly Agree
Our southern boarder is a massive point of venerability that terrorists,drug runners,human traffickers, prostitution rings, illegals etc exploit. We need to secure our southern boarder swiftly and firmly.
Who should be allowed to immigrate to the U.S. and under what circumstances?
We need a decades long immigration ban and a reversal of the Kennedy error immigration policy. As Michael Savage said We need to favor skilled European migrants for at least 20 years after the ban is lifted. We need to not allow countries we are in conflict with eg Russia and China to flood us with their dissenters.We need To end the ability of South America,Africa and the 3rd world despots to use us as a steam valve to avoid an uprising against them.We need to end the use of anchor babies update our refugee policy and quit letting people use it as a way to become economic migrants.
EDUCATION
I support school choice, including voucher programs, tax credits, charter schools, private schools, and home schools.
Strongly Agree
We also need a reform of the curriculum is formulated a ban on social experiments like crt and "gender theory" as well as baring drag queen story hour and corrupt groups that maintain child molesters allow on there board or cover up criminal actions of sitting board members like Fairbanks light opera theater has spent years doing.
VALUES
Judeo-Christian values established a framework of morality which is necessary for our system of limited government.
Neutral
Christian values I absolutely support but this need to hyphenate everything to be "inclusive is ridiculous and Condemned by both scripture and tradition.Most notably Pope Saint Pius X condemnations of religious indifferentism. Buddist Hindu jeduo none of those pan Christian combinations is accurate or praise worthy.
I support adding gender identity as a specially protected class in non-discrimination laws.
Strongly Disagree
Absolutely not, To do so would undermine every existing protection for traits that are actually inborn and opens the door to further abuses down the line.
Marriage is a God-ordained, sacred and legal union of one man and one woman. No government has the authority to alter this definition
Strongly Agree
To suggest anything else is antithetical to the divine and natural law. As well as reason,common sense and the founding documents of our republic.
I agree with Critical Race Theory (CRT) which asserts that the institutions in the United States are fundamentally racist.
Strongly Disagree
The theory is ludicrous and is Marxist propaganda blatantly being used to destroy what's left of western society.
Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.
I'm a traditional Catholic who holds the sedevacantist position (we've had no valid Pope since Pius XII) and practices the faith as it was held prior to the false council of Vatican 2.
ELECTIONS AND VOTING
People should be able to vote without photo identification.
Strongly Disagree
I can't buy a firearm,alcohol,tobacco or drive a car without photo ID why should people be able to vote without it. All that's going to do is create massive amounts of voter fraud.
What laws would you propose to change present voting practices?
The implementation of voter ID, the elimination of machines owned by China and a return to hand counting votes under strict witness observation, a tightening of existing regulations and proper cleansing of voter roles dead people and non citizens shouldn't be on them.
EQUALITY
Is racism a threat to domestic security in the United States? Why or why not?
If it is a threat it is only a threat artificially do to the lefts harping on it and Hollywood's constant box ticking riling people up. As well as Academics crying white privilege every 10 seconds. Many times crime is committed by someone of the same race as the victim aside from most violent crime. Which is generally happening in democrat run intercity neighborhoods that tend to be majority black. Chicago and Harlem for example.However lately there has been an uptick of black on Asian crime and a condemnation of the work ethic of the "model minority" by the media.
Reparations should be given to people on the basis of race.
Strongly Disagree
No group of people is entitled to financial compensation for something that didn't happen to them by people who didn't do anything to them nor even the descendants of those who did something to someone else.
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
Which comes closest to your view? A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. B) Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost.
A we need deregulation and to actually look into the situation. We don't need to follow some Gia cultists.
I support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources.
Strongly Agree
We have to be careful to do it properly rush jobs and doing things without the proper safety precautions consistently ends in disaster.
ABOUT YOU
What do you think is the general purpose of government?
Under the constitution To ensure as much as possible social morality ( which hopefully leads to the salvation of souls).As well as to Insure safety and the legitimate freedoms of the general population.
When you consider your views on a wide range of issues from economic and social matters to foreign policy and religious liberty, which of the following best describes you overall?
Very Conservative
Please provide publicly available information, including interviews and media reports, validating your answer to the previous question (other than your website).
My numerous speeches at town halls and political rallies are a mater of public record.
Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized in either civil or criminal court for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.
No
What else would you like voters to know about you, including your legislative priorities?
My main purpose in running is none profit reform, the corruption and abuse of the systems to the lack of local and state controls has allowed groups like Fairbanks light opera theater to ignore the law and face no punishments for decades. That has to end.
CRIMINAL JUSTICE & PUBLIC SAFETY
Police officers should be personally immune from prosecution for conduct consistent with departmental policy (qualified immunity) while on duty.
Strongly Disagree
Bad policy,inaction and incompetence on the part of the officer aren't morally acceptable. That excuse didn't work at Nuremberg it shouldn't work here.
I support redirecting funds from police departments to mental health and community programs.
Neutral
I'd rather see a decrease in the inflated pay and benefits packages be used as away to cut spending overall.It shouldn't be a way to funnel money unregulated into something that will like end up as bad if not worse than police unions have shown themselves to be.
2ND AMENDMENT
What restrictions on gun ownership are needed to protect public safety?
None, or is shall not be infringed not clear enough.we need to trim down gun laws not add new ones.
Victims of gun violence should be able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers.
Strongly Disagree
Absolutely not, that would open up the industry to being stagnated and destroyed by overly litigious money hungry Lawyers.
If you are not already receiving our emails, stay up to date with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.
Invest in America’s Future
Join the movement to restore biblical values and constitutional principles in our nation by informing and mobilizing more faith-based voters with the truth.