Lady Donna Dutchess

Neutral

Rich individuals have the financial means to address their unwanted pregnancies. I suggest a balanced approach to this matter by supporting government funds for abortions and vasectomies collectively. Anytime someone needs a government funded abortion, their partner should also be offered a government funded vasectomy at the same time. Federally funding vasectomies, which are reversible, would eventually render Roe vs. Wade moot.

Neutral

I respect the right of any individual to choose their path in life or their path to death.

Abortions should be allowed when the unwanted pregnancy is a risk to an individual's life or livelihood. Abortions and vasectomies should go hand in hand and be allowed by law.

Neutral

Redistribution of income is basically a concept to "take from the rich and give to the poor". I would only support this concept when it includes the overly wealthy elected officials (public servants) who are hoarding millions at the expense of our poor and working class people. Our governments should not be churning out as many wealthy millionaires as it is currently doing. Furthermore, "religious organizations" hoarding millions should also be addressed.

Agree

Our national debt is astronomical and our nation's out of control spending is not sustainable. It weakens our country and allows the foreign government cliques to target the United States using our debt as a strategic weak-point.

The tax code needs a thorough clean up. Currently, the tax code is so convoluted, that appears to be by design, with the intent to create 'jobs' for this industry.

Neutral

I do not believe religious liberty is at risk in the USA. The 1st amendment of the U. S. Constitution guarantees freedoms concerning religious expression, therefore, religious liberty already has the highest level of protection in the law.

Strongly Agree

As an American, I am at liberty to study and review the many religious beliefs and doctrines. Regardless of religious doctrine, believers are bound by the law, otherwise, they are considered practicing 'lawlessness', which is a violation of their doctrine. As a result, believers are required to provide services that are lawful. Laws that violate a person's moral and/or religious beliefs are to be taken by that person to their Most High God, Supreme Being, for intercession and revival.

The relationship between church and government should remain absolutely separate. The state should not impose upon Americans the government's 'absolute belief' in anything outside the law, thereby, violating the 1st Amendment of the Constitution and subsequent Establishment Clause. The state is not to impose upon Americans their absolute belief in anything, to include scientology, medical scientology, and the like; that overrides an individual's constitutional right to seek out their particular 'Supreme Being" or "Most High God" or "Divine Creator" for guidance in their life, liberty, and family decisions.

As long as the circumstances do not violate the law and religious freedoms to decline vaccinations. Regarding what is absorbed into the body, individuals understand the concept of 'good food and junk food'. Likewise, there are 'good vaccines and junk vaccines". Otherwise, why did vaccine manufacturers insist that they should be immune from prosecution under tort laws for junk vaccines that harm or poison the body; which the U.S. Supreme Court agreed with and established in 2010. It is 2022 and in eight years, the generations of children under the new vaccine requirements will enter into adult society and the health consequences will impact all Americans with either healthy thriving adults or adults racked with dis-ease. The health trend in America is quite obvious as it is rare to find three Americans in the same room not on some pharmaceutical, suffering from some medical ailment, that eventually will require more vaccines. As a result, the World Health Organization, an extension of the United Nations which was founded in the 1940's by communist China, Russia, and France (at that time), projects that the vaccine industry will make multi-billions annually. Fortunately, just because the government and courts believe absolutely in vaccine science, does not mean that all Americans must absolutely believe as the government does. Otherwise, this absolute belief in vaccine scientology, that the government is imposing, would violate the 1st Amendment and Establishment clause. However, since it appears that the American government and courts have established an absolute belief in vaccine science for Americans, as Pro Se, I am currently working on a Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court regarding this very matter.

Since our elected officials in the government have made a disastrous mess of the health and vitality of Americans by allowing, introducing, and/or imposing products that contain poisons, that cause the American citizens to become racked with dis-ease, the government should guarantee healthcare for all Americans. Since the elected officials in the government are entitled to government healthcare, all Americans should be entitled to the same government funded 'quality' healthcare. My view on healthcare is quality healthcare for all Americans, regardless of wealth and status.

The US has become too involved in others' policy and it is my assessment our own sovereignty is currently in imminent danger. I have come to the conclusion that America has made enemies in foreign lands, who love to run tactical strategies in order to put America in a place of submission internationally. Based on reports coming out publicly from the government accountability office, the armed services in February 2022, admitted that America is way behind on the artificial intelligence technology for weapons systems (AITWS), so now America is trying to 'play catch up'. America does not have half of the AITWS that foreign governments have because we spent the bulk of our military budget on armory. America has the largest weapons armory in the world, therefore, it is logical that foreign governments would not press us on that strength. Foreign governments will press American military weaknesses like nano AITWS and the like. In fact, a strategic movement is in motion currently by foreign countries against America. There is a strategic move in the Art of War, where the enemy replaces "good wood with rotten wood" in order to weaken the infrastructure of a country. Based on my assessment, foreign cliques with interests against America, has place rotten corrupted "wood" in our infrastructure, which is also revealing an internal corruption of nepotism, and America is slowly collapsing.

Neutral

Studying history, Arabs and Israelis are descendants from the same bloodline, Abraham. Basically, they are 'brothers' still fighting with each other over land, as though their Most High God is not watching and does not know what they are doing to each other. Throughout history, foreign countries have tried to rule or intervene over this particular piece of land with disastrous results. Therefore, I support us helping these feuding 'brother nations' by staying neutral about this topic.

Neutral

Clearly, the CCP is in motion with strategic moves against America. They have studied American military, economic strengths, and intelligence well. I concluded the moment that COVID deployed and Russia went into Ukraine, the CCP and its allies were ready to implement their military strategy. All war is deception and proving power. The CCP is far more advanced with 'weiqi' cyber nano artificial intelligence than America. I suggest that America mitigate these strategic moves immediately.

I have noticed, that at times, the American government appears to conduct itself in an elitist and tone deaf manner, which then triggers fury in other cultures and countries. I understand that America is a military force to be reckoned with. The USA makes trillions selling armory, so perhaps being tone deaf is on purpose, in order to create strife, to sell more armory and make more money. Every American learned in public school, same as I did, that war recovers our economy. I suggest we stop creating terrorists in other countries in order to help eradicate threats and bring peace.

Strongly Agree

The fact that the southern border is so open to crime is incredible. The White House has a fence (border). Elected officials have fences (borders). We sell No Trespassing signs so clearly Americans agree with borders and security. There is a perfectly legal way to enter and become a citizen of America. Therefore, I conclude that the southern border is unsecure by design to create lawlessness.

Strongly Agree

America is a country built on the ideal of law and order. Without law and order, America will crumble and fall apart, which appears to be happening. I understand the need for sanctuary, however, sanctuary should not violate the law, in order preserve peace in our country.

Anyone who wants to immigrate to the U.S., should be allowed to do so. It is understood that, to immigrate to the U.S., all applicable laws are followed.

Neutral

Part of the issue in America is that the current discrimination laws are not followed. It should not matter what an individuals gender, sexual orientation, race, culture, national origin, disability or religion is. Adding to this law is moot when the current law is ignored or marginalized. Every American simply wishes for life, liberty, and happiness for themselves and their family, without the unfair burden of being ostracized because of who they are born to be.

Neutral

I agree that there are institutions in the United States of America that fundamentally practice discrimination across the board, which is a violation of the law.

Since I was not born into a specific family religion, I enjoy exercising my American religious freedom by examining the avenues of available faiths; from Judaism, Islam, Christianity, to Shamanism, Buddhism, Scientology, and more. I have witnessed for myself the religious traditions that are passed down from grandparent to parent to child. It is written in many religious scriptures that it is the Divine Spirit that brings an individual to the love, knowledge, faith, and guidance of the Supreme Being or Divine God. For my personal path in life, with the assistance of the Divine Spirit, I have made a final decision on who it is I call my God. It is the Most High God, my Father in Heaven, to whom I place my worship and faith in. For me, the Most High God is the One who is at a level like none other. I believe that only the Most High God is the Keeper of Time and Hearts. Religious freedom in America means that each citizen has the right to choose who they place, or do not place, their faith in. I believe this right should not be infringed upon. No one selects the Time of their birth, nor do they select the Time of their death, as these are universal mysteries. It is only when we exhale our last breath, do we all find out if our choice religion, revealed by our conduct and words, will withstand eternity. My values align with 1st Council and Divine Council of a local Alaskan Monastery. The Most High God sits in the lead seat of Divine Council as the Higher Divine Mind. Furthermore, I also believe that just as we can conceptualize the idea of computerized 'virtual reality', or the 'matrix', where we are plugged into a different reality to experience, I believe we are already plugged into a reality, here on earth, as designed by the Most High God. This explains why nothing leaves this reality when a person dies, including their material goods and wealth. Everything here on this planet, remains on this planet's platform, as it is part of the design construct of this place. When a person dies, they 'wake up' in their spiritual form, stand before the Divine Council, and review everything they did and said, both publicly and in secret, as everything a person does while plugged into this world's reality is 'recorded' like video camera eyes and 'written' in books, for all of the Heavenly Court to witness. This is why it is written in scriptures all things on this earthly platform are vanity and illusion. That said, it certainly matters what an individual does or says here on earth, as it is part of their 'testimony' that will be witnessed by the Highest Divine Court. It is the concept of "on Earth as it is in Heaven" or "as it is Above, it is Below". In the event an individual chooses to not believe that an account is made of their actions and words, then that is upon their conscience when they die. Each person is held accountable. The 80 plus years a person lives on this planet's platform are essential as their behaviors and words determine their eternity. My life's journey here is all about the Path with the Most High God. From the moment we are born, we are conditioned to this world, based on our family traditions, rules, regulations, laws, schooling, and customs. The Most High God designed this place, so of course, it is understood that we are born into conditions placed upon us, that too often are outside our control. However, the Most High God continuously reaches out to those individuals who turn their hearts to the Divine. I am a typical American, born in Kansas, adopted, a military raised child living in Alaska since 1985, of mixed heritage, living in under a Vow of Poverty. Through my Path in Life, the Most High God keeps reaching out to me with guidance that was different from the conditions imposed upon me during my upbringing. The Most High God was always respectful of my choices and let me learn some lessons the hard way. There was a time in my life many years ago that reaching out to the Most High God was last on my list. Currently, after so many decades of training, guiding and correcting me, I am finally at that point in my Path that the Most High God is first on my list when I seek guidance. One of the lessons that made a huge impression on me was when the Most High God brought me to Matthew 7: 22 & 23. Then, I had understanding of what I was witnessing around me in America. It was the lessons of Jonah, Sodom, and Gomorrah that taught me how to Respectfully Petition the Divine Court of the Most High God, for an Angelic Investigation, providing names of individuals regarding what I was witnessing & experiencing. I understood that the Most High God could get to the "marrow" of the matter. The foundation of my values and beliefs are in the Most High God, the Supreme Being, the Divine Creator, the Keeper of Time, the All Knowing, the Most Gracious, the Most Persistent, the Most Forgiving, the Most Merciful, the Holy One...my Father who is in Heaven. (smiles)

Disagree

It is 2022 and the age of photograph technology is upon us all. Foreign cliques will infiltrate the American voting system in order to assist their strategic moves. To think otherwise is naive. The only people or individuals without photos or means to get an ID are those who live in poverty. Help those living in poverty get a photo ID.

Poor individuals and people with disabilities should have avenues available and laws in place to help them vote with ease. Voting practices that undermine the integrity of elections and prevent a fair vote, should be rooted out and addressed. The Commission on Presidential Debates has full control and only allows two parties at presidential debates. This means, anyone who is lead to run, and not part of the two party system, is excluded, and is wasting their time and money running for president. I would propose a law to change that system setup.

Neutral

Reparations should be given to people who have been abused or injured based on discrimination or genocide practices.

Discrimination of any kind, which includes race, is a threat to domestic security as it undermines the integrity of our country and provides a security weak point that foreign government cliques will target and utilize.

Strongly Disagree

America behaves like an 'oil' drug addict, unable to let go of the oil and gas addiction in order to invest in energy independence. Like all addicts, America will eventually 'hit the wall' and fall apart, providing foreign governments with yet another weak point to use to their advantage.

Apparently, it all comes down to 'cost'. Basically, no matter what, this is going to cost Americans something. If we are too strict with environmental laws, it will cost both jobs and the economy. If we are not strict with environmental laws, it will cost us our health and the economy. Sick and tired individuals will not care about work or will not care about making billions of dollars for corporations. This is one example of how the health of Americans could impact the economy, just as COVID did. Based on my observations regarding energy and the environment, we appear to be in a type of energy crisis in our search for clean energy. By this I mean we appear to be unable to mitigate our energy industry effectively, while also being conscious of the environmental impacts we as consumers create. On one hand, the pressure is to maintain the status quo so that it does not impact jobs and profit. On the other hand, the pressure is to find clean ways to maintain our energy consumption without destroying our environment and health, while simultaneously creating jobs. With the ingenuity of human innovations, it does not seem reasonable that we have not collectively come up with a viable source of clean energy, harnessing either the sun, wind, water, and/or earth power in a responsible way. Pollutants in our environment from irresponsible energy corporations eventually end up in our food chain. Factoring in the 'domino effect', those pollutants eventually are ingested by our families that over time, impact our health. I support innovating clean energy technology (that has been 'shelved' in lieu of traditional profits), undeveloped patented technology, and entrepreneurship of small energy research companies. I support these types of energy innovations through government loans, subsidies, and grants. At the same time, I support targeting large corporations that knowingly put toxins, poisons, and carcinogenic materials into our environment. Large corporations have not been held fully accountable or responsible for knowingly putting their poisons in our environment, shrugging off million dollar 'government fines' as a drop in their multi-billion dollar profit bucket.

Moderate

Non Partisan

I am a huge proponent of perspective, research, and educating oneself. I have noticed, depending on the media base, information is presented to their audience based on their politically based perspective. Therefore, I research, review data and information across the political spectrum, internationally, from various media websites, the world bank database, the WHO, the UN, et cetera. I use my personal facebook page as my online filing system for the topics of importance I am tracking, researching or monitoring in order to mitigate risk.

No.

I am the embodiment of Justice and Mercy.

Disagree

History proves departmental policy shifts. Qualified Immunity has covered up criminal activity for too long and has corrupted the foundation of law, order and peacekeeping.

Strongly Disagree

I support retraining the police to uphold the law and peace. The growing mental health issue in America is another matter altogether that needs addressing.

I am pro 2nd Amendment. Every American has the right to defend themselves against any domestic or foreign threat on American soil with guns. Every American has the right to protect their lives, or the lives of their loved one's under threat, until law enforcement arrives with guns. Furthermore, I support civilian training with gun education testing endorsements on government ID's to own a gun. Testing endorsements that cover the spectrum of gun handling and safety prior to owning a weapon would help mitigate gun violence in America. If an individual does not pass the gun safety testing, then gun merchants would be restricted from selling a gun to that individual, as the testing endorsement would not be on their government issued ID. Someone who passed the testing and has been endorsed, would be responsible for keeping their weapons safely locked away.

Strongly Disagree

If a gun was legally sold, then they should not be sued for selling a product legally.