John George

I believe that anyone that receives an abortion for any reason other than a life saving emergency, rape, incest, or similarly situated cases, should undergo tubal sterilization performed at the time of the induced abortion.

Strongly Agree

Any person who uses taxpayer funding to receive an abortion should be disqualified from receiving all forms of state assistance.

Neutral

I don't believe this is a matter the state should really be involved in.

Eliminate Iowa's tax code and replace it with a picture of Claire Celsi to remind future generations how scary the personal income tax is.

Deconstruction of the administrative state, gutting what's left of the public sector unions, cut as much as possible from welfare & public 'service's programs, sell or lease out unused land owned by the State, and any other wasteful or unnecessary government programs.

Strongly Disagree

The is no provision in the Iowa Constitution that requires the State to provide a minimally sufficient public education or require the state to fund them. Our public education system has also been infiltrated for the past 60 years by Neo-Marxists who use critical pedagogy to trigger social change. Or in other words, they have been brainwashing our kids to believe they are inherently racist and that the only way to fix it is to adapt to forget their old 'truth' & invest in social diversity.

Strongly Disagree

Our Constitution was written to limit government and protect the right of the individual. An individual or business shoulf be able to provide services to whoever they want whenever they want using their own judgment. This is something the free market should handle, not the government.

Never. Government and Churches should never have to exist within the same circle. When that happens, we risk government replacing god or god replacing the government. Any time we mix the Bible with the Sword, slaves are made out of men.

The constitutional conservative in me tells me to choose D, but we've made the mistake of letting these socialist welfare programs become so firmly entrenched in out society that it is bleeding us dry. We have also seen what can happen when these healthcare programs become dependent on government funding of Medicade & Medicare in the form of Creepy Joe's vaccine mandates. Government money always comes with strings attached and is another reason to defund. However, to abolish any program that people have come to rely on is an impossible task. We need to get to the root of the problem, which is ending Government policies that shift the burden to private insurers, licensing barriers & state certification of need laws end up being protectionist policies that force potential competitors out of the market, there is just so many factors involved mostly centered around the government.

None. Schools are government so these two can be summed up through the right of self ownership. Private ownership is a little tougher to argue, other than people can always find a employer that suits their personal values more. That's usually not the practical thing to do for long time employees, but once again, it's more of a free market issue than a rights issue. Employers who backed the attempted Biden mandate are now having troubles filling those jobs. Personally, if after seeing how many people are having severe helath complications to the jab, as well as waiting to see what the long term affects will be, plus the sheer ineffectiveness of the vax to protect against new variants should all add up to tell someone that the risk isnt worth it. Jobs come and go but vaccine related deaths are a one way street.

By doing what President Trump did. Make mutually beneficial economic deals between countries that have historically been at war with each other. This is also known as the McDonald's doctrine because it the fact that there has never been a war between two nations that had a McDonald's operating between their borders (at least this was the case before the Russia/Ukraine conflict). Once two nations become economically tied to each other usually dont go to war with each other.

Choose not to answer

I'm not touching this one and pledge that I will instead focus on issues that affect us here in Iowa.

Strongly Agree

Finish the damn wall!

Any peaceful and productive people who after being thoroughly vetted, choose to do so legally.

Strongly Agree

Public schools have become indoctrination centers of the radical left and they seek to program our children from the daycare center to our colleges. There is no other way to get rid of the infestation other than burning the entire system down and starting it over. Neo-Marxist critical theory is the equivalent of the CIAs Mkultra mind control program. Democrats are destroying America & we need to stop them.

Disagree

There has been a long list of Judeo-Christian politicians who have both grown the government into a Leviathan like structure and possessed the moral turpitude equal to that of a weekend getaway on Epstein Island. Limited government has nothing to do with religious background. It has to do with having a strong Constituion and the means to hold governments accountable for violating it.

Disagree

Gender identity already is a protected class under the Iowa Civil Rights Act. And I dont support it being there and wouldn't support it adding it if wasnt. Gender identity might not be a choice for some people but the transitioning process is. No one should be considered a protected class because the used free will. Pedophiles may not feel like it's a choice for them to want diddle kids, but should we make them a protected class too?

Disagree

Governments shouldn't be involved in anyone's decision to be with another person not should you need a license to do so. If marriage is a God given ordained union, then only God can judge them for it. I have bigger issues that I could be dealing with.

Strongly Disagree

If anyone answers any other choice than strongly disagree, they are the enemies of our Republic and should be dealt with accordingly.

My beliefs are rooted in the concept of freedom and liberty that is founded by Natural Law.

Disagree

Audit the entire State of Iowa's 2020 election results, highlight any and all anomalies or unusual circumstances, then remove them from the books. Make no mistake, as long as we allow excuseless absentee voting, proprietary voting machines and resources supplied by 3rd party vendors, or Democrats in general to exist, there will continue to be rampant voter fraud.

Because radical leftists and socialists are attempting to fulfill their Marxist destinies by inciting the revolution necessary to move them into the next phase of their plan and are using race to provide the spark. Most dont even realize what is happening all around us but we need to inform them and show them with their own eyes.

Strongly Disagree

My family never owned any slaves. Quit bitching about things that happened 200 years ago that no one during this day and age can control.

You lost me at stricter laws.

Strongly Agree

We went from leading the world in natural gas reserves to no reserves and $5/gallon gas. FJB!

To protect individual liberty and follow its enumerated constitutional duties.

Very Conservative

I worked for Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty in 2012 as well as his son Rand's presidential campaign in 2015. I am a constitutional pundit and one of the most fierce advocates of personal liberty and individual freedom in the State of Iowa.

Absolutely not.

To paraphrase Kevin Costner's character John Dutton on the show Yellowstone, "There is a war being waged against our way of life. They'll tell you all the reasons why our way of life is bad for America. The ugly truth is they want a revolution. And if they get it, it will never look like our great Republic again. That is progress in today's terms. So if it's progress you seek, do not vote for me. I am the opposite of progress. I am the wall that it bashes against. And I will not be the one who breaks." I believe this perfectly sums up the fight we all have ahead of us. These are our enemies, not our colleagues or associates. Progress to them is destroying what's sacred to us. I refuse to let that happen and is exactly why I chose to be on the ballot June 7th.

Disagree

Police need to be able to act without hesitation in the line of duty, however, we need to be able to hold the government accountable for when they fail to fulfill their duties to the general public as well. I know I wouldn't provide this much protection for any other state bureaucrat. I would be higher on this list if the first two words said law enforcement instead of police officers as well. There is a significant difference between the two.

Strongly Disagree

No answer is needed. This is commie talk about defunding the police. We need to defund Democrats instead.

The 2nd amendment exists for protecting an individual's life, liberty and property, not the public at large. For this interpretation I whole heartedly support zero restrictions within reason.

Strongly Disagree

This has always baffled me. Other than if they somehow acted in negligence, why? They dont sue Chevy for no reason when someone gets in an accident do they?