Michael F McMahon

Non-Partisan | Montana

Candidate Profile

Moderate

BIOGRAPHY

Name

Michael F McMahon


Party

Non-Partisan


Election Year

2022


Election

Primary


Race

Supreme Court, Seat 2


Incumbent

No


Links


EDUCATION

Candidate did not provide

WORK & MILITARY

Candidate did not provide

AFFILIATIONS

Candidate did not provide

POLITICAL OFFICES HELD

Candidate did not provide

POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT

Candidate did not provide

Race

SELECTED FINANCIAL SOURCE DOCUMENTS

To search the candidate’s state campaign finance reports, please click "source".

OTHER INFORMATION

Judge Michael "Mike" McMahon serves as a judge on the Montana 1st Judicial District Court


Info from Other Sources:

  • According to the Independent Record, Judge McMahon said he was running to do "the right thing" as a justice. He explained, "I think it's important that all judges have direction from the Supreme Court that they can rely upon… And that's my goal is to make sure if I'm elected to continue that process that Chief Justice (Mike) McGrath and the other justices have, in my view, maintained to a large extent. Maybe not a complete extent, but to a large extent." McMahon identifies as a "strict constructionist." McMahon said he ran against Gustafson rather than Rice because he tended to aligned more with Justice Rice. He commented, "When I read his decisions, I see a lot that I like from a standpoint of, let's say, the stricter construction, if that's fair to say. That's not saying Justice Gustafson is not. Just analyzing their respective decisions, I see a difference." On his judicial philosophy in comparison with Gustafson's, McMahon said, "Some will think that our judicial philosophies are different. I guess that's up to the voters to decide what type of judicial philosophy they want on the court."
  • In differentiating himself from Justice Gustafson, McMahon said he aligned more with Justice Rice and that “It’s not a matter of me versus her. It’s a matter of, in my view, what do the Montana voters, what kind of Supreme Court justice do they want. And I’ve laid out, I think I’m conservative and I use common sense.” McMahon also said he doesn’t see himself as a candidate who is out to 'save the judiciary.' He said his motivation was to apply the law the best way he knew how, regardless of personal ideology or partisan politics. "People will say things about me, about my decisions. I mean, I had a brother tell me, 'My God, Mike, you’ve pissed off the Republicans and you’ve pissed off the Democrats. There’s only going to be 16 people that vote for you,'" McMahon said. 'I look at that and say, well, I guess I’m doing my job.'"
  • McMahon struck down portions of a "constitutional carry" law that applied to college campuses.
  • McMahon was criticized when it was revealed that he knew the victim in one of his cases and his sentence was found by a higher court to be "clearly excessive." McMahon responded that critics were "misinformed" about the case and that he was not aware of any complaint sent to the Judicial Standards Commission, the body responsible for sanctioning judges. McMahon said he was prepared for whatever happened during the election-- "You know, labels have been put on a lot of judges, especially me. I was raised to turn the other cheek. … I think I was called an activist, a judicial activist, on one case and then, you know, two cases later they're applauding. That's just the nature of the game."
  • The Daily Montanan said that both Judge McMahon and Justice Gustafson "eschew political labels" and "resisted direct philosophical comparisons with their opponent, each pointing to a broad array of their own experiences as a judge and attorney."

QUESTIONNAIRE

VALUES

I agree with Critical Race Theory (CRT) which asserts that the institutions in the United States are fundamentally racist.

Did not answer

Judeo-Christian values established a framework of morality that is necessary for our system of limited government.

Did not answer

Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.

Did not answer

What types of pro bono work have you done?

Did not answer


ABOUT YOU

Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized in either civil or criminal court for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.

Did not answer

What education or experience qualifies you to hold the office for which you seek election?

Did not answer

Why should the voters choose you?

Did not answer

I voted in these primaries and general elections:

Did not answer


JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY

Justices should not interpret the federal and state constitutions as living documents, but should use a textualist and originalist approach to interpretation.

Did not answer

What is the proper use of legislative history in interpreting statutory law?

Did not answer

Which current or past U.S. Supreme Court justice best reflects your judicial philosophy?

Did not answer

How should a court address the balance between public health and individual freedoms in the time of a pandemic?

Did not answer

In light of the case Bostock v. Clayton County, in which the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include a prohibition on sexual-orientation discrimination, which justice’s opinion most closely aligns with your own opinion?

Did not answer

What role (if any) does a judge have in maintaining the separation of church and state?

Did not answer

Religious liberty is at risk in the United States and deserves the highest level of protection in the law.

Did not answer

When should a judge overturn past court decisions?

Did not answer

How should a judge determine which rights are protected by the Constitution even though they are not specifically mentioned?

Did not answer

What legal principles should a court consider when evaluating parents’ objection to their child obtaining medical procedures or drugs designed to affirm the child’s desired gender?

Did not answer

What principles should guide a court’s analysis of whether your state’s constitution gives terminally ill patients a right to assisted suicide?

Did not answer

Would you describe your judicial philosophy as originalist, living constitutionalist, or something else?

Did not answer

If you are not already receiving our emails, stay up to date with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.

I agree to receive text messages at the phone number provided.