Ruben Landon Dante

Strongly Agree

The right to life is a foundational Constitutional right. Americans must understand the federal government is not an inherent producer of funds. It is our tax money brokered by the federal government which is being used unconstitutionally and against our sincerely held beliefs. We must roll back and challenge the constitutionality of the administrative state which assigns so much financing and elect a congress that does the job we are elected to do. We must properly convey this.

Strongly Agree

The right to life is a foundational Constitutional right. Americans must understand the federal government is not an inherent producer of funds. It is our tax money brokered by the federal government which is being used unconstitutionally and against our sincerely held beliefs. We must roll back and challenge the constitutionality of the administrative state which assigns so much financing and elect a congress that does the job we are elected to do. We must properly convey this.

Strongly Agree

The right to life is a foundational Constitutional right. Americans must understand the federal government is not an inherent producer of funds. It is our tax money brokered by the federal government which is being used unconstitutionally and against our sincerely held beliefs. We must roll back and challenge the constitutionality of the administrative state which assigns so much financing and elect a congress that does the job we are elected to do. We must properly convey this.

Neutral

There are people that would rather not be vegetables for 10 years at a hospital. This is a nuanced question. If a mentally capable adult in extreme pain, or vegetable state, I don't think its my role to prohibit their request for ending a synthetically supported life.

Neutral

There are people that would rather not be vegetables for 10 years at a hospital. This is a nuanced question. If a mentally capable adult in extreme pain, or vegetable state, I don't think its my role to prohibit their request for ending a synthetically supported life.

Neutral

There are people that would rather not be vegetables for 10 years at a hospital. This is a nuanced question. If a mentally capable adult in extreme pain, or vegetable state, I don't think its my role to prohibit their request for ending a synthetically supported life.

The truth is neither partisan or complex. It's the lies we tell to subvert the truth which are. For that reason the truth in universal law, when properly convey will resonate with all. In doing so not only ""winning"" a "culture war"; but more importantly brining forth the most perfect union by conveying the beautiful depth of resonance in universal law The Constitution is rooted on. I could give an electable and generic answer to this question to appease the conservative primary base which primary winner takes congress, that would be the easy and establishment thing to do. However we have serious problems in America today which require radical fortitude, courage, introspection, facts, discernment and faith so I was answer this question the way I would if you were a progressive, liberal Democrat. It is only the deepest, most resonant calm but certain truth that will win our cause and set them free. That truth is that there is no way to splice abortion from the fact it is a premeditated termination of a life that would otherwise come to be without its force. This the same framework used in court, the George Floyd cause or otherwise. Further, abortion is not about woman's rights and it never was, It is about trivializing death. This evident by the LGBT communities' Pre and Post Exposure Prophylaxis. You see, like birth control pre-exposure prophylaxis is taken every day to avoid contracting HIV. Like birth control people forget to take it and may have an encounter or exposure thereafter. HIV exposure like pregnancy may derive from rape, incest or otherwise. Unlike abortion however HIV does not negotiate. Should any of the above occur, one has only 72h to get on post exposure prophylaxis from the point of exposure or encounter. The point of exposure or encounter, universally that is the timestamp medically relevant, not from the point of a positive test. However you do not see democrats boycotting and protesting HIV or any prophylaxis. Why? Because science, viruses and medicine do not negotiate. Should The Constitutional right to life be treated at least with the same seriousness as HIV? That is the question we are asking liberals. With that said, beyond The Constitution right to life, if you believe in a higher power (which I do) you understand the world of reaction is an inverted paradigm. It brings one to a perpetually responsive state by which response would derive from the deepest and most obfuscated blind sports which would be first to trigger any reactive state. For that reason we need elected officials who deeply understand the root of their deepest sincerely held beliefs to the inception of Universal Law so they understand how to reframe the question. "Under what circumstances should the adjudication of life be deferred to the carrying body?" That's where deductive reasoning, faith, The Constitution and its Universal Law breaks from man. We cannot be the arbiters of life and death without becoming the same we attempt to prevent. For that reason my simple answer to the above question is when a mother's life is at risk from it. We cannot adjudicate that process without committing the same charge driving us. To my previous point about reaction and reactivity, I will now introduce proactivity, solutions and end game. When one is proactive one is living on purpose in free will met by discernment upon introspection, contrast and resonance. They are operating in knowing willingness from their experience and level of perception. [I am deeply against interventionism as it pertains to the sovereign journey to discovery of the highest and most finite resonance by contrasting resonance in the gamut of the human experience in accordance with the free will tenant of Universal Law. For that reason it is not in my belief it is the role of Government to adjudicate the process of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness only to facilitate it. Here you must personally discern if your goal is to end abortions in protection of the sanctity of life or if it is to prosecute women and discern priority. My end being we no longer on ponder on abortions at large, as it pertains to rape, incest, etc. I belief we should be proactive in the facilitation of birth control, plan B, education, reversible vasectomies, IUD's with grace on the bride to abortion no longer being a common state of preponderance upon the American social memory complex. This may not as convenient, easy, digestible or politically correct answer, but it's the only honest answer and solution I see. In accordance with the Free Will tenant of Universal Law by which liberty derives from, this goes back to you. Do you really want solutions, change, liberty and life? Do you want another day of logical justification and ideological complacency? That is the crossroads America in its lead of the world social memory is at. In you, The future of our social memory.

The truth is neither partisan or complex. It's the lies we tell to subvert the truth which are. For that reason the truth in universal law, when properly convey will resonate with all. In doing so not only ""winning"" a "culture war"; but more importantly brining forth the most perfect union by conveying the beautiful depth of resonance in universal law The Constitution is rooted on. I could give an electable and generic answer to this question to appease the conservative primary base which primary winner takes congress, that would be the easy and establishment thing to do. However we have serious problems in America today which require radical fortitude, courage, introspection, facts, discernment and faith so I was answer this question the way I would if you were a progressive, liberal Democrat. It is only the deepest, most resonant calm but certain truth that will win our cause and set them free. That truth is that there is no way to splice abortion from the fact it is a premeditated termination of a life that would otherwise come to be without its force. This the same framework used in court, the George Floyd cause or otherwise. Further, abortion is not about woman's rights and it never was, It is about trivializing death. This evident by the LGBT communities' Pre and Post Exposure Prophylaxis. You see, like birth control pre-exposure prophylaxis is taken every day to avoid contracting HIV. Like birth control people forget to take it and may have an encounter or exposure thereafter. HIV exposure like pregnancy may derive from rape, incest or otherwise. Unlike abortion however HIV does not negotiate. Should any of the above occur, one has only 72h to get on post exposure prophylaxis from the point of exposure or encounter. The point of exposure or encounter, universally that is the timestamp medically relevant, not from the point of a positive test. However you do not see democrats boycotting and protesting HIV or any prophylaxis. Why? Because science, viruses and medicine do not negotiate. Should The Constitutional right to life be treated at least with the same seriousness as HIV? That is the question we are asking liberals. With that said, beyond The Constitution right to life, if you believe in a higher power (which I do) you understand the world of reaction is an inverted paradigm. It brings one to a perpetually responsive state by which response would derive from the deepest and most obfuscated blind sports which would be first to trigger any reactive state. For that reason we need elected officials who deeply understand the root of their deepest sincerely held beliefs to the inception of Universal Law so they understand how to reframe the question. "Under what circumstances should the adjudication of life be deferred to the carrying body?" That's where deductive reasoning, faith, The Constitution and its Universal Law breaks from man. We cannot be the arbiters of life and death without becoming the same we attempt to prevent. For that reason my simple answer to the above question is when a mother's life is at risk from it. We cannot adjudicate that process without committing the same charge driving us. To my previous point about reaction and reactivity, I will now introduce proactivity, solutions and end game. When one is proactive one is living on purpose in free will met by discernment upon introspection, contrast and resonance. They are operating in knowing willingness from their experience and level of perception. [I am deeply against interventionism as it pertains to the sovereign journey to discovery of the highest and most finite resonance by contrasting resonance in the gamut of the human experience in accordance with the free will tenant of Universal Law. For that reason it is not in my belief it is the role of Government to adjudicate the process of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness only to facilitate it. Here you must personally discern if your goal is to end abortions in protection of the sanctity of life or if it is to prosecute women and discern priority. My end being we no longer on ponder on abortions at large, as it pertains to rape, incest, etc. I belief we should be proactive in the facilitation of birth control, plan B, education, reversible vasectomies, IUD's with grace on the bride to abortion no longer being a common state of preponderance upon the American social memory complex. This may not as convenient, easy, digestible or politically correct answer, but it's the only honest answer and solution I see. In accordance with the Free Will tenant of Universal Law by which liberty derives from, this goes back to you. Do you really want solutions, change, liberty and life? Do you want another day of logical justification and ideological complacency? That is the crossroads America in its lead of the world social memory is at. In you, The future of our social memory.

The truth is neither partisan or complex. It's the lies we tell to subvert the truth which are. For that reason the truth in universal law, when properly convey will resonate with all. In doing so not only ""winning"" a "culture war"; but more importantly brining forth the most perfect union by conveying the beautiful depth of resonance in universal law The Constitution is rooted on. I could give an electable and generic answer to this question to appease the conservative primary base which primary winner takes congress, that would be the easy and establishment thing to do. However we have serious problems in America today which require radical fortitude, courage, introspection, facts, discernment and faith so I was answer this question the way I would if you were a progressive, liberal Democrat. It is only the deepest, most resonant calm but certain truth that will win our cause and set them free. That truth is that there is no way to splice abortion from the fact it is a premeditated termination of a life that would otherwise come to be without its force. This the same framework used in court, the George Floyd cause or otherwise. Further, abortion is not about woman's rights and it never was, It is about trivializing death. This evident by the LGBT communities' Pre and Post Exposure Prophylaxis. You see, like birth control pre-exposure prophylaxis is taken every day to avoid contracting HIV. Like birth control people forget to take it and may have an encounter or exposure thereafter. HIV exposure like pregnancy may derive from rape, incest or otherwise. Unlike abortion however HIV does not negotiate. Should any of the above occur, one has only 72h to get on post exposure prophylaxis from the point of exposure or encounter. The point of exposure or encounter, universally that is the timestamp medically relevant, not from the point of a positive test. However you do not see democrats boycotting and protesting HIV or any prophylaxis. Why? Because science, viruses and medicine do not negotiate. Should The Constitutional right to life be treated at least with the same seriousness as HIV? That is the question we are asking liberals. With that said, beyond The Constitution right to life, if you believe in a higher power (which I do) you understand the world of reaction is an inverted paradigm. It brings one to a perpetually responsive state by which response would derive from the deepest and most obfuscated blind sports which would be first to trigger any reactive state. For that reason we need elected officials who deeply understand the root of their deepest sincerely held beliefs to the inception of Universal Law so they understand how to reframe the question. "Under what circumstances should the adjudication of life be deferred to the carrying body?" That's where deductive reasoning, faith, The Constitution and its Universal Law breaks from man. We cannot be the arbiters of life and death without becoming the same we attempt to prevent. For that reason my simple answer to the above question is when a mother's life is at risk from it. We cannot adjudicate that process without committing the same charge driving us. To my previous point about reaction and reactivity, I will now introduce proactivity, solutions and end game. When one is proactive one is living on purpose in free will met by discernment upon introspection, contrast and resonance. They are operating in knowing willingness from their experience and level of perception. [I am deeply against interventionism as it pertains to the sovereign journey to discovery of the highest and most finite resonance by contrasting resonance in the gamut of the human experience in accordance with the free will tenant of Universal Law. For that reason it is not in my belief it is the role of Government to adjudicate the process of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness only to facilitate it. Here you must personally discern if your goal is to end abortions in protection of the sanctity of life or if it is to prosecute women and discern priority. My end being we no longer on ponder on abortions at large, as it pertains to rape, incest, etc. I belief we should be proactive in the facilitation of birth control, plan B, education, reversible vasectomies, IUD's with grace on the bride to abortion no longer being a common state of preponderance upon the American social memory complex. This may not as convenient, easy, digestible or politically correct answer, but it's the only honest answer and solution I see. In accordance with the Free Will tenant of Universal Law by which liberty derives from, this goes back to you. Do you really want solutions, change, liberty and life? Do you want another day of logical justification and ideological complacency? That is the crossroads America in its lead of the world social memory is at. In you, The future of our social memory.

Strongly Disagree

The opposite, we must return to a constitutional republic and honest capitalism. We The People must issue Margin Call against the Federal Reserve and Federal Government and its world banks. The flagship of my campaign is a bill in which "We The People" issue margin call against the Federal Reserve and Government to post 35% in Gold, Silver and intrinsic assets to all the debts, assets, derivatives, synthetics, CDO's etc. or face assignment at increasingly deflation by rate of default.

Strongly Disagree

The opposite, we must return to a constitutional republic and honest capitalism. We The People must issue Margin Call against the Federal Reserve and Federal Government and its world banks. The flagship of my campaign is a bill in which "We The People" issue margin call against the Federal Reserve and Government to post 35% in Gold, Silver and intrinsic assets to all the debts, assets, derivatives, synthetics, CDO's etc. or face assignment at increasingly deflation by rate of default.

Strongly Disagree

The opposite, we must return to a constitutional republic and honest capitalism. We The People must issue Margin Call against the Federal Reserve and Federal Government and its world banks. The flagship of my campaign is a bill in which "We The People" issue margin call against the Federal Reserve and Government to post 35% in Gold, Silver and intrinsic assets to all the debts, assets, derivatives, synthetics, CDO's etc. or face assignment at increasingly deflation by rate of default.

Strongly Disagree

The federal government nothing. Its time We The People issue "margin call" (per se) against the federal government to produce 35% in Gold and Silver to its spending valued at the closing of gold and silver futures to the prior day close. Failure to do so We The People recall the administrative state, assets, accounts receivable assigned deflated by rate of default. Excess fiat burnt or assigned in dividend payments to every SSN Card Holder.

Strongly Disagree

The federal government nothing. Its time We The People issue "margin call" (per se) against the federal government to produce 35% in Gold and Silver to its spending valued at the closing of gold and silver futures to the prior day close. Failure to do so We The People recall the administrative state, assets, accounts receivable assigned deflated by rate of default. Excess fiat burnt or assigned in dividend payments to every SSN Card Holder.

Strongly Disagree

The federal government nothing. Its time We The People issue "margin call" (per se) against the federal government to produce 35% in Gold and Silver to its spending valued at the closing of gold and silver futures to the prior day close. Failure to do so We The People recall the administrative state, assets, accounts receivable assigned deflated by rate of default. Excess fiat burnt or assigned in dividend payments to every SSN Card Holder.

First we must discern the inception of federal taxation, the role of the Federal Reserve, what we are paying for and who the beneficiaries are in conflict of interest to the safety, security and well being of we the people. War profiteering by laundering our tax dollars to international corporations with shareholders, operations and profits by designation of "enemy Territory" enabled by U.S officials possibly treasonous.; 18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason U.S. Code Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. Considering the diametrical opposition between war and the safety, security and wellbeing and financial state of "We The People" we need a special council, congress and America First representatives to conduct deep investigation into how much of our national debt has been paid to politicians and contractors who may be guilty of treason in their allegiance to profits in enemy lines for multinational shareholders in tribute, expense, opportunity cost and danger to We The People. Considering A Supreme Court ruling on domicile, politicians who took money in racketeering from war profiteers directly, indirectly or from lobbyist who voted for such wars perhaps also guilty of treason and in violation of The Federal Elections Commission's rules on foreign donations and those in enemy territories. Citizens United itself with a fatal flaw in scope as it pertains to Domicile in businesses and "American". From there upon our finding we we asses what debts are even valid. Much of our "debt" may be to corporate terrorist, contractors, etc. who may have used unlawful war crimes via intelligence agencies in the use of violence and intimidation against innocent civilians world wide in the pursuit of political aims of funding. If such is found, clawback and liquidation is to be made debt to be wiped upon charging such guilty of Treason. This investigation across corporate war profiteers, in government as shareholders, consultants, backdoors, corporate executives, intelligence agencies, Presidents or otherwise. We The People will not negotiate with such terrorist or any criminal "Debts". At this point it is highly likely most of our debt is recalled and positive upon clawbacks and liquidations, (in alignment with the Federal Reserve Margin Call model) massive deflation in the recall and dividend payments made to every Social Security Card holder pegged to gold, silver futures value, blockchain or otherwise. Not, at this point we can begin to talk about "Taxation" and "Tax Code" Upon contesting the legality of federal taxation and our determination thereafter, should federal taxation stand at all, we must strip the entire Administrative state and laws thereafter be made only by a competently led congress to which spending is transparent to all. Military action to be made by Congress with Military recalled back to respective states forcing any president to acquire congressional approval. I am highly skeptical of Federal Taxation at all and should be thoroughly challenged. -Any funding of war must be voter approved by overnight biometrics, blockchain, emergency text, ID.me or otherwise. In the same respect I absolutely find annual property taxation highly unconstitutional. No one pays annual residual taxation over their products or otherwise. Most fundamentally, I would move taxation if applicable from its interstate state which amalgamates a federal centralized power of the worst kind, to fundamental reform, responsible management and positive GDP dividend spending. America and the American people first. No more funding or assistance to any other nation until We The People can all reasonably and collectively live a dignified life. However My proposal to recall the Federal Reserve is fundamentally diametrically opposed to any system of taxation.

First we must discern the inception of federal taxation, the role of the Federal Reserve, what we are paying for and who the beneficiaries are in conflict of interest to the safety, security and well being of we the people. War profiteering by laundering our tax dollars to international corporations with shareholders, operations and profits by designation of "enemy Territory" enabled by U.S officials possibly treasonous.; 18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason U.S. Code Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. Considering the diametrical opposition between war and the safety, security and wellbeing and financial state of "We The People" we need a special council, congress and America First representatives to conduct deep investigation into how much of our national debt has been paid to politicians and contractors who may be guilty of treason in their allegiance to profits in enemy lines for multinational shareholders in tribute, expense, opportunity cost and danger to We The People. Considering A Supreme Court ruling on domicile, politicians who took money in racketeering from war profiteers directly, indirectly or from lobbyist who voted for such wars perhaps also guilty of treason and in violation of The Federal Elections Commission's rules on foreign donations and those in enemy territories. Citizens United itself with a fatal flaw in scope as it pertains to Domicile in businesses and "American". From there upon our finding we we asses what debts are even valid. Much of our "debt" may be to corporate terrorist, contractors, etc. who may have used unlawful war crimes via intelligence agencies in the use of violence and intimidation against innocent civilians world wide in the pursuit of political aims of funding. If such is found, clawback and liquidation is to be made debt to be wiped upon charging such guilty of Treason. This investigation across corporate war profiteers, in government as shareholders, consultants, backdoors, corporate executives, intelligence agencies, Presidents or otherwise. We The People will not negotiate with such terrorist or any criminal "Debts". At this point it is highly likely most of our debt is recalled and positive upon clawbacks and liquidations, (in alignment with the Federal Reserve Margin Call model) massive deflation in the recall and dividend payments made to every Social Security Card holder pegged to gold, silver futures value, blockchain or otherwise. Not, at this point we can begin to talk about "Taxation" and "Tax Code" Upon contesting the legality of federal taxation and our determination thereafter, should federal taxation stand at all, we must strip the entire Administrative state and laws thereafter be made only by a competently led congress to which spending is transparent to all. Military action to be made by Congress with Military recalled back to respective states forcing any president to acquire congressional approval. I am highly skeptical of Federal Taxation at all and should be thoroughly challenged. -Any funding of war must be voter approved by overnight biometrics, blockchain, emergency text, ID.me or otherwise. In the same respect I absolutely find annual property taxation highly unconstitutional. No one pays annual residual taxation over their products or otherwise. Most fundamentally, I would move taxation if applicable from its interstate state which amalgamates a federal centralized power of the worst kind, to fundamental reform, responsible management and positive GDP dividend spending. America and the American people first. No more funding or assistance to any other nation until We The People can all reasonably and collectively live a dignified life. However My proposal to recall the Federal Reserve is fundamentally diametrically opposed to any system of taxation.

First we must discern the inception of federal taxation, the role of the Federal Reserve, what we are paying for and who the beneficiaries are in conflict of interest to the safety, security and well being of we the people. War profiteering by laundering our tax dollars to international corporations with shareholders, operations and profits by designation of "enemy Territory" enabled by U.S officials possibly treasonous.; 18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason U.S. Code Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States. Considering the diametrical opposition between war and the safety, security and wellbeing and financial state of "We The People" we need a special council, congress and America First representatives to conduct deep investigation into how much of our national debt has been paid to politicians and contractors who may be guilty of treason in their allegiance to profits in enemy lines for multinational shareholders in tribute, expense, opportunity cost and danger to We The People. Considering A Supreme Court ruling on domicile, politicians who took money in racketeering from war profiteers directly, indirectly or from lobbyist who voted for such wars perhaps also guilty of treason and in violation of The Federal Elections Commission's rules on foreign donations and those in enemy territories. Citizens United itself with a fatal flaw in scope as it pertains to Domicile in businesses and "American". From there upon our finding we we asses what debts are even valid. Much of our "debt" may be to corporate terrorist, contractors, etc. who may have used unlawful war crimes via intelligence agencies in the use of violence and intimidation against innocent civilians world wide in the pursuit of political aims of funding. If such is found, clawback and liquidation is to be made debt to be wiped upon charging such guilty of Treason. This investigation across corporate war profiteers, in government as shareholders, consultants, backdoors, corporate executives, intelligence agencies, Presidents or otherwise. We The People will not negotiate with such terrorist or any criminal "Debts". At this point it is highly likely most of our debt is recalled and positive upon clawbacks and liquidations, (in alignment with the Federal Reserve Margin Call model) massive deflation in the recall and dividend payments made to every Social Security Card holder pegged to gold, silver futures value, blockchain or otherwise. Not, at this point we can begin to talk about "Taxation" and "Tax Code" Upon contesting the legality of federal taxation and our determination thereafter, should federal taxation stand at all, we must strip the entire Administrative state and laws thereafter be made only by a competently led congress to which spending is transparent to all. Military action to be made by Congress with Military recalled back to respective states forcing any president to acquire congressional approval. I am highly skeptical of Federal Taxation at all and should be thoroughly challenged. -Any funding of war must be voter approved by overnight biometrics, blockchain, emergency text, ID.me or otherwise. In the same respect I absolutely find annual property taxation highly unconstitutional. No one pays annual residual taxation over their products or otherwise. Most fundamentally, I would move taxation if applicable from its interstate state which amalgamates a federal centralized power of the worst kind, to fundamental reform, responsible management and positive GDP dividend spending. America and the American people first. No more funding or assistance to any other nation until We The People can all reasonably and collectively live a dignified life. However My proposal to recall the Federal Reserve is fundamentally diametrically opposed to any system of taxation.

Strongly Agree

This is deeply personal to me and I am intensely passionate on the issue of defending Religious liberty from the state. Fundamentally it is Church and our sincerely held beliefs over prioritized over the actions of state. From taxation used against our sincerely held beliefs to State inference on state. If there was any Tax reform I believe in, its expanding the rights of people of faith from taxation to any funding against personal beliefs. This forcing an itemized tax code reform

Strongly Agree

This is deeply personal to me and I am intensely passionate on the issue of defending Religious liberty from the state. Fundamentally it is Church and our sincerely held beliefs over prioritized over the actions of state. From taxation used against our sincerely held beliefs to State inference on state. If there was any Tax reform I believe in, its expanding the rights of people of faith from taxation to any funding against personal beliefs. This forcing an itemized tax code reform

Strongly Agree

This is deeply personal to me and I am intensely passionate on the issue of defending Religious liberty from the state. Fundamentally it is Church and our sincerely held beliefs over prioritized over the actions of state. From taxation used against our sincerely held beliefs to State inference on state. If there was any Tax reform I believe in, its expanding the rights of people of faith from taxation to any funding against personal beliefs. This forcing an itemized tax code reform

Strongly Disagree

This goes back to universal law and conveying such the same way as done in regards to abortion. I am an ordained minister and ""LGBT"". I would not personally merry two people I believe to be toxic to each other regardless of gender. I shouldn't be sued for that. Moreover, "Marriage" is a specific term that should of never been adopted by the state leaving church out of it from inception. Its application, related to policy and contracts thereafter should of been the reform.

Strongly Disagree

This goes back to universal law and conveying such the same way as done in regards to abortion. I am an ordained minister and ""LGBT"". I would not personally merry two people I believe to be toxic to each other regardless of gender. I shouldn't be sued for that. Moreover, "Marriage" is a specific term that should of never been adopted by the state leaving church out of it from inception. Its application, related to policy and contracts thereafter should of been the reform.

Strongly Disagree

This goes back to universal law and conveying such the same way as done in regards to abortion. I am an ordained minister and ""LGBT"". I would not personally merry two people I believe to be toxic to each other regardless of gender. I shouldn't be sued for that. Moreover, "Marriage" is a specific term that should of never been adopted by the state leaving church out of it from inception. Its application, related to policy and contracts thereafter should of been the reform.

None. The only role state has in anything as it pertains to anything remotely close to the church is the adjudication of child support, responsible parties and a child's well being in accordance with the inalienable rights imbued from Creation in inception. These rights honored and protected by The Constitution in We The People until the child becomes of age. That is a very limited scope assigned to the state overlapping with church only if marriage or conscious uncoupling was ordained under church jurisdiction. The only application here would be the honoring of the ministers certification in the state union jurisdiction. Moreover, church and faithful rights should come above the state. I believe it to be a fundamental matter of constitutional and human right to opt out of any taxation on your efforts going against your sincerely held beliefs. Thus, further partitioning church from state in taxation. If one identifies as religious the allowed allocation of any taxation should be restricted to designations by schedule. There could be a few ways to go about this either by entire percentage of federal taxation only going to funding selected causes, or the prior year expenditure weighted opt out.

None. The only role state has in anything as it pertains to anything remotely close to the church is the adjudication of child support, responsible parties and a child's well being in accordance with the inalienable rights imbued from Creation in inception. These rights honored and protected by The Constitution in We The People until the child becomes of age. That is a very limited scope assigned to the state overlapping with church only if marriage or conscious uncoupling was ordained under church jurisdiction. The only application here would be the honoring of the ministers certification in the state union jurisdiction. Moreover, church and faithful rights should come above the state. I believe it to be a fundamental matter of constitutional and human right to opt out of any taxation on your efforts going against your sincerely held beliefs. Thus, further partitioning church from state in taxation. If one identifies as religious the allowed allocation of any taxation should be restricted to designations by schedule. There could be a few ways to go about this either by entire percentage of federal taxation only going to funding selected causes, or the prior year expenditure weighted opt out.

None. The only role state has in anything as it pertains to anything remotely close to the church is the adjudication of child support, responsible parties and a child's well being in accordance with the inalienable rights imbued from Creation in inception. These rights honored and protected by The Constitution in We The People until the child becomes of age. That is a very limited scope assigned to the state overlapping with church only if marriage or conscious uncoupling was ordained under church jurisdiction. The only application here would be the honoring of the ministers certification in the state union jurisdiction. Moreover, church and faithful rights should come above the state. I believe it to be a fundamental matter of constitutional and human right to opt out of any taxation on your efforts going against your sincerely held beliefs. Thus, further partitioning church from state in taxation. If one identifies as religious the allowed allocation of any taxation should be restricted to designations by schedule. There could be a few ways to go about this either by entire percentage of federal taxation only going to funding selected causes, or the prior year expenditure weighted opt out.

None. No individual rights or free will are to be imposed or infringed upon by any collective made up of Individuals. No Individual is to have higher weighed rights because they composite a collective of ideological individuals. "Greater Good" a fallacy old as time proven divergent over and over again.

None. No individual rights or free will are to be imposed or infringed upon by any collective made up of Individuals. No Individual is to have higher weighed rights because they composite a collective of ideological individuals. "Greater Good" a fallacy old as time proven divergent over and over again.

None. No individual rights or free will are to be imposed or infringed upon by any collective made up of Individuals. No Individual is to have higher weighed rights because they composite a collective of ideological individuals. "Greater Good" a fallacy old as time proven divergent over and over again.

This goes back to America First priorities. First and foremost there is no reason negotiations of any kind should be restricted to either government or insurance. I propose we eradicate this government imposed trauma bond by demanding ally countries provide a master list accessible to We The People of medical suppliers to which we may individually choose whom to order medications from. Should medications be restricted or scheduled delivery could be made to pharmacies or authorized bodies to confirm such medication was prescribed. Multinational Pharmaceutical companies have demonstrated over and over again they have no allegiance to We The People thus we owe no allegiance to them. Should any pharmaceutical company demonstrate an America First execution or exclusivity absent international operations or shareholders we may institute such prioritization accordingly. Either all domestic in supply chain, ownership and vertical integration, or all multinational equally accessible to all without restrictions or gridlocks in both medications and insurance. At that point, all things being equal we would have stronger negotiating power as individuals with insurance companies and clear on the intrinsic benefit they provide to us Individually likely cheaper than any government subsidy public, private or otherwise. Finally, if any American is to pay any taxation, it should prioritize the well being of We The People of America First. Therefore I believe our efforts, energy and resources should go to the domestic supply and demand equilibrium so health and healthcare is affordable to all before we give free money handouts to the rest of the world. [On a final sidetone, I believe any tax payer funds or corporate handouts used to create a medication would treat We the People as shareholders and investors from grant issuance stock price or market cap. Thereafter dividend payments made to every social security card holder over the profitability of the drug funded by We The People by the percentage we funded from inception paid out on annual basis.] The way it works in any capitalistic endeavor that isn't inverted at our expense.

This goes back to America First priorities. First and foremost there is no reason negotiations of any kind should be restricted to either government or insurance. I propose we eradicate this government imposed trauma bond by demanding ally countries provide a master list accessible to We The People of medical suppliers to which we may individually choose whom to order medications from. Should medications be restricted or scheduled delivery could be made to pharmacies or authorized bodies to confirm such medication was prescribed. Multinational Pharmaceutical companies have demonstrated over and over again they have no allegiance to We The People thus we owe no allegiance to them. Should any pharmaceutical company demonstrate an America First execution or exclusivity absent international operations or shareholders we may institute such prioritization accordingly. Either all domestic in supply chain, ownership and vertical integration, or all multinational equally accessible to all without restrictions or gridlocks in both medications and insurance. At that point, all things being equal we would have stronger negotiating power as individuals with insurance companies and clear on the intrinsic benefit they provide to us Individually likely cheaper than any government subsidy public, private or otherwise. Finally, if any American is to pay any taxation, it should prioritize the well being of We The People of America First. Therefore I believe our efforts, energy and resources should go to the domestic supply and demand equilibrium so health and healthcare is affordable to all before we give free money handouts to the rest of the world. [On a final sidetone, I believe any tax payer funds or corporate handouts used to create a medication would treat We the People as shareholders and investors from grant issuance stock price or market cap. Thereafter dividend payments made to every social security card holder over the profitability of the drug funded by We The People by the percentage we funded from inception paid out on annual basis.] The way it works in any capitalistic endeavor that isn't inverted at our expense.

This goes back to America First priorities. First and foremost there is no reason negotiations of any kind should be restricted to either government or insurance. I propose we eradicate this government imposed trauma bond by demanding ally countries provide a master list accessible to We The People of medical suppliers to which we may individually choose whom to order medications from. Should medications be restricted or scheduled delivery could be made to pharmacies or authorized bodies to confirm such medication was prescribed. Multinational Pharmaceutical companies have demonstrated over and over again they have no allegiance to We The People thus we owe no allegiance to them. Should any pharmaceutical company demonstrate an America First execution or exclusivity absent international operations or shareholders we may institute such prioritization accordingly. Either all domestic in supply chain, ownership and vertical integration, or all multinational equally accessible to all without restrictions or gridlocks in both medications and insurance. At that point, all things being equal we would have stronger negotiating power as individuals with insurance companies and clear on the intrinsic benefit they provide to us Individually likely cheaper than any government subsidy public, private or otherwise. Finally, if any American is to pay any taxation, it should prioritize the well being of We The People of America First. Therefore I believe our efforts, energy and resources should go to the domestic supply and demand equilibrium so health and healthcare is affordable to all before we give free money handouts to the rest of the world. [On a final sidetone, I believe any tax payer funds or corporate handouts used to create a medication would treat We the People as shareholders and investors from grant issuance stock price or market cap. Thereafter dividend payments made to every social security card holder over the profitability of the drug funded by We The People by the percentage we funded from inception paid out on annual basis.] The way it works in any capitalistic endeavor that isn't inverted at our expense.

The United States has become too involved in others' policies and should remain focused on issues regarding our own sovereignty unless in imminent danger. The determination of imminent danger is to be made by We the People. Agencies, government or otherwise may present evidence of such threat to the people by presenting evidence, sources, principal citations, audio, visual or otherwise. Universally we are to implement a new set of agencies which hold public investigations and public discovery weighted by financial beneficiaries top down as the most likely suspects, terrorist, agitators and instigators. Track all transactions of said dangers or terrorist, their services if any within U.S corporations and make them all publicly available is the case to be made such person, group, agency or country is an alleged terrorist.

The United States has become too involved in others' policies and should remain focused on issues regarding our own sovereignty unless in imminent danger. The determination of imminent danger is to be made by We the People. Agencies, government or otherwise may present evidence of such threat to the people by presenting evidence, sources, principal citations, audio, visual or otherwise. Universally we are to implement a new set of agencies which hold public investigations and public discovery weighted by financial beneficiaries top down as the most likely suspects, terrorist, agitators and instigators. Track all transactions of said dangers or terrorist, their services if any within U.S corporations and make them all publicly available is the case to be made such person, group, agency or country is an alleged terrorist.

The United States has become too involved in others' policies and should remain focused on issues regarding our own sovereignty unless in imminent danger. The determination of imminent danger is to be made by We the People. Agencies, government or otherwise may present evidence of such threat to the people by presenting evidence, sources, principal citations, audio, visual or otherwise. Universally we are to implement a new set of agencies which hold public investigations and public discovery weighted by financial beneficiaries top down as the most likely suspects, terrorist, agitators and instigators. Track all transactions of said dangers or terrorist, their services if any within U.S corporations and make them all publicly available is the case to be made such person, group, agency or country is an alleged terrorist.

Strongly Agree

I need more details and specifications on this. Should all the good faith claims made by Israel are true, I can give them the benefit of the doubt and implementing honesty and good faith safeguards such as 24/7 publicly viewable cameras in all public areas to substantiate their innocence in relevant claims.

Strongly Agree

I need more details and specifications on this. Should all the good faith claims made by Israel are true, I can give them the benefit of the doubt and implementing honesty and good faith safeguards such as 24/7 publicly viewable cameras in all public areas to substantiate their innocence in relevant claims.

Strongly Agree

I need more details and specifications on this. Should all the good faith claims made by Israel are true, I can give them the benefit of the doubt and implementing honesty and good faith safeguards such as 24/7 publicly viewable cameras in all public areas to substantiate their innocence in relevant claims.

Strongly Agree

To agree or disagree would be based on hearsay. We need to divest from "Trust", inverted to faith trust is usually a gaslighting keyword. The way to make this a none issue is to cut any dependance or trade from them. There would be no intellectual property to steal if we didn't allow so many corporations to enmesh between us and China with individual motives. Bring it all back to the US and cut contracts with any corporation double dipping if such is true however let's not play guess.

Strongly Agree

To agree or disagree would be based on hearsay. We need to divest from "Trust", inverted to faith trust is usually a gaslighting keyword. The way to make this a none issue is to cut any dependance or trade from them. There would be no intellectual property to steal if we didn't allow so many corporations to enmesh between us and China with individual motives. Bring it all back to the US and cut contracts with any corporation double dipping if such is true however let's not play guess.

Strongly Agree

To agree or disagree would be based on hearsay. We need to divest from "Trust", inverted to faith trust is usually a gaslighting keyword. The way to make this a none issue is to cut any dependance or trade from them. There would be no intellectual property to steal if we didn't allow so many corporations to enmesh between us and China with individual motives. Bring it all back to the US and cut contracts with any corporation double dipping if such is true however let's not play guess.

First let's substantiate its existence, motive, financing, beneficiaries and common denominators. Thereafter overlap common denominations, beneficiaries and funding and make all of it publicly available. Thereafter extrapolate the evidence by reaching to any common denomination in corporate allies and such terrorist groups. Too often we see brutal decapitation videos or otherwise in high definition quality video and I can't help but wonder; Who is their cell phone provider? Who is the manufacturer of their phone? What cell tower or wifi are they using? Who are such services registered under? What is the NSA doing? Who will profit from the release of these videos? Who bought their cell phone? Who is paying their bills? If they are such overt terrorist why do they always cover their face? When did 3 trillion dollars in resources become synonymous with "Islamic Terrorism". Who signed up for the military in a quest to defend silicon chipsets? Where do these 3T dollars of resources go upon U.S military adjudication of such resources? Are those to be distributed equally amongst our military men and women risking their lives for such? Do they go to the women who's rights we are fighting for? Because otherwise, it seems as though the terrorist and traitors are not in some cave but rather private elites at the top of Governments with no allegiance to America offering We the People as tribute to their rouge and parastic self preservation. My priority is to defend the safety, life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of We The American People against any enemy foreign or domestic. If determination of such Islamic state is made then we diffuse it. "War on Terror" Is an oxymoron in the matrix of language. War is terror and terror is war, any illusion of such is to cast a perpetual loop of cognitive dissonance. We need a peace core to defuse such terrorist threat. It's hard to broken peace with someone who's children elites kill every day in our name. The very military industrial complex self preservation is contingent on way to Launder our tax money to themselves. It is a conflict of interest from start to finish. I might be wrong in all of my concerns but we at least need someone in congress to begin to ask the most consequential questions to We The People.

First let's substantiate its existence, motive, financing, beneficiaries and common denominators. Thereafter overlap common denominations, beneficiaries and funding and make all of it publicly available. Thereafter extrapolate the evidence by reaching to any common denomination in corporate allies and such terrorist groups. Too often we see brutal decapitation videos or otherwise in high definition quality video and I can't help but wonder; Who is their cell phone provider? Who is the manufacturer of their phone? What cell tower or wifi are they using? Who are such services registered under? What is the NSA doing? Who will profit from the release of these videos? Who bought their cell phone? Who is paying their bills? If they are such overt terrorist why do they always cover their face? When did 3 trillion dollars in resources become synonymous with "Islamic Terrorism". Who signed up for the military in a quest to defend silicon chipsets? Where do these 3T dollars of resources go upon U.S military adjudication of such resources? Are those to be distributed equally amongst our military men and women risking their lives for such? Do they go to the women who's rights we are fighting for? Because otherwise, it seems as though the terrorist and traitors are not in some cave but rather private elites at the top of Governments with no allegiance to America offering We the People as tribute to their rouge and parastic self preservation. My priority is to defend the safety, life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of We The American People against any enemy foreign or domestic. If determination of such Islamic state is made then we diffuse it. "War on Terror" Is an oxymoron in the matrix of language. War is terror and terror is war, any illusion of such is to cast a perpetual loop of cognitive dissonance. We need a peace core to defuse such terrorist threat. It's hard to broken peace with someone who's children elites kill every day in our name. The very military industrial complex self preservation is contingent on way to Launder our tax money to themselves. It is a conflict of interest from start to finish. I might be wrong in all of my concerns but we at least need someone in congress to begin to ask the most consequential questions to We The People.

First let's substantiate its existence, motive, financing, beneficiaries and common denominators. Thereafter overlap common denominations, beneficiaries and funding and make all of it publicly available. Thereafter extrapolate the evidence by reaching to any common denomination in corporate allies and such terrorist groups. Too often we see brutal decapitation videos or otherwise in high definition quality video and I can't help but wonder; Who is their cell phone provider? Who is the manufacturer of their phone? What cell tower or wifi are they using? Who are such services registered under? What is the NSA doing? Who will profit from the release of these videos? Who bought their cell phone? Who is paying their bills? If they are such overt terrorist why do they always cover their face? When did 3 trillion dollars in resources become synonymous with "Islamic Terrorism". Who signed up for the military in a quest to defend silicon chipsets? Where do these 3T dollars of resources go upon U.S military adjudication of such resources? Are those to be distributed equally amongst our military men and women risking their lives for such? Do they go to the women who's rights we are fighting for? Because otherwise, it seems as though the terrorist and traitors are not in some cave but rather private elites at the top of Governments with no allegiance to America offering We the People as tribute to their rouge and parastic self preservation. My priority is to defend the safety, life, liberty and pursuit of happiness of We The American People against any enemy foreign or domestic. If determination of such Islamic state is made then we diffuse it. "War on Terror" Is an oxymoron in the matrix of language. War is terror and terror is war, any illusion of such is to cast a perpetual loop of cognitive dissonance. We need a peace core to defuse such terrorist threat. It's hard to broken peace with someone who's children elites kill every day in our name. The very military industrial complex self preservation is contingent on way to Launder our tax money to themselves. It is a conflict of interest from start to finish. I might be wrong in all of my concerns but we at least need someone in congress to begin to ask the most consequential questions to We The People.

Strongly Agree

Without boundaries we have nothing. Without boundaries we are subject to perpetual self degradation down to the impulse of the most perverse. Anyone who object to proper boundaries is surely someone looking to take advantage of you, exploit, enmesh and abuse you. Not only do we need safe and secure boundaries and boarders, we need to prosecute anyone who's enabled the sacred breach of our bounders. In my opinion, this breach is the insurrection sponsored by federal government Democrats.

Strongly Agree

Without boundaries we have nothing. Without boundaries we are subject to perpetual self degradation down to the impulse of the most perverse. Anyone who object to proper boundaries is surely someone looking to take advantage of you, exploit, enmesh and abuse you. Not only do we need safe and secure boundaries and boarders, we need to prosecute anyone who's enabled the sacred breach of our bounders. In my opinion, this breach is the insurrection sponsored by federal government Democrats.

Strongly Agree

Without boundaries we have nothing. Without boundaries we are subject to perpetual self degradation down to the impulse of the most perverse. Anyone who object to proper boundaries is surely someone looking to take advantage of you, exploit, enmesh and abuse you. Not only do we need safe and secure boundaries and boarders, we need to prosecute anyone who's enabled the sacred breach of our bounders. In my opinion, this breach is the insurrection sponsored by federal government Democrats.

Strongly Agree

Absolutely, they are the cause of a violent uprising against law an order. The true insurrectionist upon our republic.

Strongly Agree

Absolutely, they are the cause of a violent uprising against law an order. The true insurrectionist upon our republic.

Strongly Agree

Absolutely, they are the cause of a violent uprising against law an order. The true insurrectionist upon our republic.

Whomever follows the legal immigration process applicable to their circumstance. I would favor the law or supply and demand by industry but with so much fiat and existing illegal immigrants already here there is already a divergent economy. I would support more deportation efforts to close the spread of economical divergence more than anything else. Every job taken by an illegal immigrant is a job taken from a legal one. The argument of American unwillingness is a cognitive dissonant liberal fallacy as wages would rise until the first willing legal participant and wages meet equilibrium. I do support however and would sponsor a taxation of outbound money to other countries at 50 percent. While I do not believe in taxation, I do find it worthwhile as a penalty to curtail actions that affect us all. Working illegally at the expense of a legal American to then remove that money from our economy on top of that is egregious and must be curtailed right away.

Whomever follows the legal immigration process applicable to their circumstance. I would favor the law or supply and demand by industry but with so much fiat and existing illegal immigrants already here there is already a divergent economy. I would support more deportation efforts to close the spread of economical divergence more than anything else. Every job taken by an illegal immigrant is a job taken from a legal one. The argument of American unwillingness is a cognitive dissonant liberal fallacy as wages would rise until the first willing legal participant and wages meet equilibrium. I do support however and would sponsor a taxation of outbound money to other countries at 50 percent. While I do not believe in taxation, I do find it worthwhile as a penalty to curtail actions that affect us all. Working illegally at the expense of a legal American to then remove that money from our economy on top of that is egregious and must be curtailed right away.

Whomever follows the legal immigration process applicable to their circumstance. I would favor the law or supply and demand by industry but with so much fiat and existing illegal immigrants already here there is already a divergent economy. I would support more deportation efforts to close the spread of economical divergence more than anything else. Every job taken by an illegal immigrant is a job taken from a legal one. The argument of American unwillingness is a cognitive dissonant liberal fallacy as wages would rise until the first willing legal participant and wages meet equilibrium. I do support however and would sponsor a taxation of outbound money to other countries at 50 percent. While I do not believe in taxation, I do find it worthwhile as a penalty to curtail actions that affect us all. Working illegally at the expense of a legal American to then remove that money from our economy on top of that is egregious and must be curtailed right away.

Strongly Agree

I do not believe in discrimination of any form. When It comes to religion however there is a constitutional partition I will always respect. I believe we must take marriage of out of the state context gay or straight and turning it to religious exclusivity.

Strongly Agree

I do not believe in discrimination of any form. When It comes to religion however there is a constitutional partition I will always respect. I believe we must take marriage of out of the state context gay or straight and turning it to religious exclusivity.

Strongly Agree

I do not believe in discrimination of any form. When It comes to religion however there is a constitutional partition I will always respect. I believe we must take marriage of out of the state context gay or straight and turning it to religious exclusivity.

Strongly Disagree

We need to get away from theory at large and focus on intrinsic skill. We spend approximately spend 19,200 hours in K-12. One school year has enough hours to acquire a real estate license, series 6, series 7, Home inspector, plumber and even law school. We need school choice. We also need to do a better job not getting distracted and gaslit and triggered into oblivion.

Strongly Disagree

We need to get away from theory at large and focus on intrinsic skill. We spend approximately spend 19,200 hours in K-12. One school year has enough hours to acquire a real estate license, series 6, series 7, Home inspector, plumber and even law school. We need school choice. We also need to do a better job not getting distracted and gaslit and triggered into oblivion.

Strongly Disagree

We need to get away from theory at large and focus on intrinsic skill. We spend approximately spend 19,200 hours in K-12. One school year has enough hours to acquire a real estate license, series 6, series 7, Home inspector, plumber and even law school. We need school choice. We also need to do a better job not getting distracted and gaslit and triggered into oblivion.

I am Christian of central column orientation. I see, understand and love Christ and his Universal Law which I came to understand upon a deep spiritual awakening which led to complete surrender in abrupt identity defragmentation. From that point it has become number one in my life and the pulse of everything I do. In this awakening I understood Christ, his sacrifice, meaning and universal application to everything we know. For this reason my interpretation of it is different from many traditional religious takes as my Chirsted awakening came entirely within. I devoted almost every waking moment to sharing my experiences, revelations and messages across all platforms, live-streamed or otherwise in the newfound awakening across digital communities. I felt God in everything; God, Source, inseparable in its interconnectedness. Source, tangible and intangible. Source, visible and invisible. Source, energy. Source, not created or destroyed. Source, Alpha and Omega. Source, power. No end and no beginning. God it truth and truth is God, Universal Law. God, its Source; Ultimate truth. A Truth, Pure in its impulse. Truth, Impulse Holy in spirit. Truth, no end and no beginning. Truth, The Alpha and Omega. Truth, pure in spirit. Truth, free from imprints, obfuscations or distortions. Herein, I saw a through line between “The Big Bang”, The Father, Son and Holy Spirit, entropy, the free will Christed impulse, great fall and pull in free will divine sovereignty in the evolutionary state through the densities of consciousness. Polarity incongruence in force, will resist integration. It is by force, that Power and Source diverged. Source, The Inception of Power. Power synthesized to Force. Force diverged to resistance. Resistance, the reaction to force. Reaction, Synthesized its charge in resistance to force. Charged by force conductor breaks from Source. Conductor, its power in force, shocking in charge, at its break from Source. A Divergence in power, fall in force, rise through entropy, integrated by grace, imbued in love, return by will. Soon after I began to understand Jesus in all the ways we know and in ways I had ever seen prior to my revelations; The metaphysical archetype of Jesus embodies the compass and through line containing the totality of our human experience. This, in addition not in contrast to what we know about him. The composition of depicting the cross over from chemical body to light body. In the cross the journey of having met positive polarity by free will and accord at the crossroads of contrast, introspection, discernment and resonance. The cross, when expanded from its two dimensional nature to the third dimension, it holds the embodiment of the world, contained at center of a sphere lit at its core, the light of the world. In his opened arms from east to west, the gamut of the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual containment of the world. At the center, unconditional love for its spectrum as many not know what they do. In Jesus the through line from the lower three materially compounded elements, density, impulses and bioenergetic fields, into the heart resonant portal to light body crossover. In the human incarnation, the four elements compounded to third density and dimension which composite the material chemical body in third density mirrored in the lower three bioenergetic (chakra) energy centers. In the placement of his crucifixion the symbology of the portal to heaven in light body met upon positive polarization. That integration being physically, chemically and by material bioenergetics through the heart. In his third dimensional incarnation placed over the two dimensional cross, the context of being materially made in God’s image and its exponential implications. The universe and its map contained within us. The imprints, resonance, gamut, universal through line and remembrance embedded and coiled within us in his image. Jesus in lifting the imprints in resonant gamut having had absorbed the worst of humanity in his crucifixion and alchemizing it into unconditional love in his forgiveness. In this, lifting the charges, imprints and distortions in between. Endlessly from east to west, north to south, as above, so below. In his opened heart as within, so without, evermore and thereafter thought all of time and space. This is not to negate any biblical contextual reference to the Sacrifice of Jesus. I just suddenly saw everything so clear. Thereafter this calling now, in pure divine guidance. When I saw I was to run for congress I was both inspired and taken aback. I could no longer see as much as I could prior, only timelines. from God through me; A daily prayer. My life has become surreal and somewhat of a blur. Only ever the imprint of moment to moment, In this moment, here I Am.

I am Christian of central column orientation. I see, understand and love Christ and his Universal Law which I came to understand upon a deep spiritual awakening which led to complete surrender in abrupt identity defragmentation. From that point it has become number one in my life and the pulse of everything I do. In this awakening I understood Christ, his sacrifice, meaning and universal application to everything we know. For this reason my interpretation of it is different from many traditional religious takes as my Chirsted awakening came entirely within. I devoted almost every waking moment to sharing my experiences, revelations and messages across all platforms, live-streamed or otherwise in the newfound awakening across digital communities. I felt God in everything; God, Source, inseparable in its interconnectedness. Source, tangible and intangible. Source, visible and invisible. Source, energy. Source, not created or destroyed. Source, Alpha and Omega. Source, power. No end and no beginning. God it truth and truth is God, Universal Law. God, its Source; Ultimate truth. A Truth, Pure in its impulse. Truth, Impulse Holy in spirit. Truth, no end and no beginning. Truth, The Alpha and Omega. Truth, pure in spirit. Truth, free from imprints, obfuscations or distortions. Herein, I saw a through line between “The Big Bang”, The Father, Son and Holy Spirit, entropy, the free will Christed impulse, great fall and pull in free will divine sovereignty in the evolutionary state through the densities of consciousness. Polarity incongruence in force, will resist integration. It is by force, that Power and Source diverged. Source, The Inception of Power. Power synthesized to Force. Force diverged to resistance. Resistance, the reaction to force. Reaction, Synthesized its charge in resistance to force. Charged by force conductor breaks from Source. Conductor, its power in force, shocking in charge, at its break from Source. A Divergence in power, fall in force, rise through entropy, integrated by grace, imbued in love, return by will. Soon after I began to understand Jesus in all the ways we know and in ways I had ever seen prior to my revelations; The metaphysical archetype of Jesus embodies the compass and through line containing the totality of our human experience. This, in addition not in contrast to what we know about him. The composition of depicting the cross over from chemical body to light body. In the cross the journey of having met positive polarity by free will and accord at the crossroads of contrast, introspection, discernment and resonance. The cross, when expanded from its two dimensional nature to the third dimension, it holds the embodiment of the world, contained at center of a sphere lit at its core, the light of the world. In his opened arms from east to west, the gamut of the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual containment of the world. At the center, unconditional love for its spectrum as many not know what they do. In Jesus the through line from the lower three materially compounded elements, density, impulses and bioenergetic fields, into the heart resonant portal to light body crossover. In the human incarnation, the four elements compounded to third density and dimension which composite the material chemical body in third density mirrored in the lower three bioenergetic (chakra) energy centers. In the placement of his crucifixion the symbology of the portal to heaven in light body met upon positive polarization. That integration being physically, chemically and by material bioenergetics through the heart. In his third dimensional incarnation placed over the two dimensional cross, the context of being materially made in God’s image and its exponential implications. The universe and its map contained within us. The imprints, resonance, gamut, universal through line and remembrance embedded and coiled within us in his image. Jesus in lifting the imprints in resonant gamut having had absorbed the worst of humanity in his crucifixion and alchemizing it into unconditional love in his forgiveness. In this, lifting the charges, imprints and distortions in between. Endlessly from east to west, north to south, as above, so below. In his opened heart as within, so without, evermore and thereafter thought all of time and space. This is not to negate any biblical contextual reference to the Sacrifice of Jesus. I just suddenly saw everything so clear. Thereafter this calling now, in pure divine guidance. When I saw I was to run for congress I was both inspired and taken aback. I could no longer see as much as I could prior, only timelines. from God through me; A daily prayer. My life has become surreal and somewhat of a blur. Only ever the imprint of moment to moment, In this moment, here I Am.

I am Christian of central column orientation. I see, understand and love Christ and his Universal Law which I came to understand upon a deep spiritual awakening which led to complete surrender in abrupt identity defragmentation. From that point it has become number one in my life and the pulse of everything I do. In this awakening I understood Christ, his sacrifice, meaning and universal application to everything we know. For this reason my interpretation of it is different from many traditional religious takes as my Chirsted awakening came entirely within. I devoted almost every waking moment to sharing my experiences, revelations and messages across all platforms, live-streamed or otherwise in the newfound awakening across digital communities. I felt God in everything; God, Source, inseparable in its interconnectedness. Source, tangible and intangible. Source, visible and invisible. Source, energy. Source, not created or destroyed. Source, Alpha and Omega. Source, power. No end and no beginning. God it truth and truth is God, Universal Law. God, its Source; Ultimate truth. A Truth, Pure in its impulse. Truth, Impulse Holy in spirit. Truth, no end and no beginning. Truth, The Alpha and Omega. Truth, pure in spirit. Truth, free from imprints, obfuscations or distortions. Herein, I saw a through line between “The Big Bang”, The Father, Son and Holy Spirit, entropy, the free will Christed impulse, great fall and pull in free will divine sovereignty in the evolutionary state through the densities of consciousness. Polarity incongruence in force, will resist integration. It is by force, that Power and Source diverged. Source, The Inception of Power. Power synthesized to Force. Force diverged to resistance. Resistance, the reaction to force. Reaction, Synthesized its charge in resistance to force. Charged by force conductor breaks from Source. Conductor, its power in force, shocking in charge, at its break from Source. A Divergence in power, fall in force, rise through entropy, integrated by grace, imbued in love, return by will. Soon after I began to understand Jesus in all the ways we know and in ways I had ever seen prior to my revelations; The metaphysical archetype of Jesus embodies the compass and through line containing the totality of our human experience. This, in addition not in contrast to what we know about him. The composition of depicting the cross over from chemical body to light body. In the cross the journey of having met positive polarity by free will and accord at the crossroads of contrast, introspection, discernment and resonance. The cross, when expanded from its two dimensional nature to the third dimension, it holds the embodiment of the world, contained at center of a sphere lit at its core, the light of the world. In his opened arms from east to west, the gamut of the physical, mental, emotional and spiritual containment of the world. At the center, unconditional love for its spectrum as many not know what they do. In Jesus the through line from the lower three materially compounded elements, density, impulses and bioenergetic fields, into the heart resonant portal to light body crossover. In the human incarnation, the four elements compounded to third density and dimension which composite the material chemical body in third density mirrored in the lower three bioenergetic (chakra) energy centers. In the placement of his crucifixion the symbology of the portal to heaven in light body met upon positive polarization. That integration being physically, chemically and by material bioenergetics through the heart. In his third dimensional incarnation placed over the two dimensional cross, the context of being materially made in God’s image and its exponential implications. The universe and its map contained within us. The imprints, resonance, gamut, universal through line and remembrance embedded and coiled within us in his image. Jesus in lifting the imprints in resonant gamut having had absorbed the worst of humanity in his crucifixion and alchemizing it into unconditional love in his forgiveness. In this, lifting the charges, imprints and distortions in between. Endlessly from east to west, north to south, as above, so below. In his opened heart as within, so without, evermore and thereafter thought all of time and space. This is not to negate any biblical contextual reference to the Sacrifice of Jesus. I just suddenly saw everything so clear. Thereafter this calling now, in pure divine guidance. When I saw I was to run for congress I was both inspired and taken aback. I could no longer see as much as I could prior, only timelines. from God through me; A daily prayer. My life has become surreal and somewhat of a blur. Only ever the imprint of moment to moment, In this moment, here I Am.

Strongly Disagree

Absolutely not. We need strong safeguards, moving lists and every voter safety measure possible.

Strongly Disagree

Absolutely not. We need strong safeguards, moving lists and every voter safety measure possible.

Strongly Disagree

Absolutely not. We need strong safeguards, moving lists and every voter safety measure possible.

We need to move above and beyond "Election integrity bills" as great as they may be, and move into election backtesting as a public standard. We should never have to rely on "trust" or "doubt" something as important as elections. When one can come within 43,000 votes across three states of winning an election, neither "trust" or "doubt" should be in the electoral discourse. I propose a public means of backtest while securing privacy. Doing so by a publicly available list of votes indexed by numerical home address, ID number and last 4 of social or some combination thereof. Further we must implement scanning machines to mark and timestamp at what time any vote has been submitted. We must publicly be able to confirm any said vote has been submitted in accordance to the state legislature’s cutoff time and framework to be legally counted towards any election. There is no shortage of ways to backtest elections and there are just two examples. What ways we use to backtest is something I am opened to discussing. However the fact we need to make election backtesting the standard is something I am unequivocal about. In God we have faith, trust is an inversion of man and always a gaslight. We need not have conversations of "trusting" any election governed by man. We must only have conversations about substantiated or unsubstantiated election victories. Doing so by metrics, data and publicly available and accessibly transparent elections. This backtest, an option for anyone with election concerns, but not with any obligation to discern. More important we need to be able to backtest publicly so we may all restore trust in our election system. There are many ways we could accomplish this from indexing and confirming our vote by numerical street address, last four of an ID number and house members to using blockchain technology. However we should all be able to index and backtest the validity and legality of every vote. We should also be able to index with our ID or social where we voted and for who.

We need to move above and beyond "Election integrity bills" as great as they may be, and move into election backtesting as a public standard. We should never have to rely on "trust" or "doubt" something as important as elections. When one can come within 43,000 votes across three states of winning an election, neither "trust" or "doubt" should be in the electoral discourse. I propose a public means of backtest while securing privacy. Doing so by a publicly available list of votes indexed by numerical home address, ID number and last 4 of social or some combination thereof. Further we must implement scanning machines to mark and timestamp at what time any vote has been submitted. We must publicly be able to confirm any said vote has been submitted in accordance to the state legislature’s cutoff time and framework to be legally counted towards any election. There is no shortage of ways to backtest elections and there are just two examples. What ways we use to backtest is something I am opened to discussing. However the fact we need to make election backtesting the standard is something I am unequivocal about. In God we have faith, trust is an inversion of man and always a gaslight. We need not have conversations of "trusting" any election governed by man. We must only have conversations about substantiated or unsubstantiated election victories. Doing so by metrics, data and publicly available and accessibly transparent elections. This backtest, an option for anyone with election concerns, but not with any obligation to discern. More important we need to be able to backtest publicly so we may all restore trust in our election system. There are many ways we could accomplish this from indexing and confirming our vote by numerical street address, last four of an ID number and house members to using blockchain technology. However we should all be able to index and backtest the validity and legality of every vote. We should also be able to index with our ID or social where we voted and for who.

We need to move above and beyond "Election integrity bills" as great as they may be, and move into election backtesting as a public standard. We should never have to rely on "trust" or "doubt" something as important as elections. When one can come within 43,000 votes across three states of winning an election, neither "trust" or "doubt" should be in the electoral discourse. I propose a public means of backtest while securing privacy. Doing so by a publicly available list of votes indexed by numerical home address, ID number and last 4 of social or some combination thereof. Further we must implement scanning machines to mark and timestamp at what time any vote has been submitted. We must publicly be able to confirm any said vote has been submitted in accordance to the state legislature’s cutoff time and framework to be legally counted towards any election. There is no shortage of ways to backtest elections and there are just two examples. What ways we use to backtest is something I am opened to discussing. However the fact we need to make election backtesting the standard is something I am unequivocal about. In God we have faith, trust is an inversion of man and always a gaslight. We need not have conversations of "trusting" any election governed by man. We must only have conversations about substantiated or unsubstantiated election victories. Doing so by metrics, data and publicly available and accessibly transparent elections. This backtest, an option for anyone with election concerns, but not with any obligation to discern. More important we need to be able to backtest publicly so we may all restore trust in our election system. There are many ways we could accomplish this from indexing and confirming our vote by numerical street address, last four of an ID number and house members to using blockchain technology. However we should all be able to index and backtest the validity and legality of every vote. We should also be able to index with our ID or social where we voted and for who.

Neutral

This is very nuanced. With recalling The Federal Reserve as my campaign flagship and contesting "legal tender" which was never settled by congress at it should of been. I believe We The People are to issue a fundamental clawback against the theft and insurrection against The Constitution from government, The Federal Reserve, and administrative state. My bills fundamentally repair this to us all by the nature of my "Margin Call" against the The Federal Reserve.

Neutral

This is very nuanced. With recalling The Federal Reserve as my campaign flagship and contesting "legal tender" which was never settled by congress at it should of been. I believe We The People are to issue a fundamental clawback against the theft and insurrection against The Constitution from government, The Federal Reserve, and administrative state. My bills fundamentally repair this to us all by the nature of my "Margin Call" against the The Federal Reserve.

Neutral

This is very nuanced. With recalling The Federal Reserve as my campaign flagship and contesting "legal tender" which was never settled by congress at it should of been. I believe We The People are to issue a fundamental clawback against the theft and insurrection against The Constitution from government, The Federal Reserve, and administrative state. My bills fundamentally repair this to us all by the nature of my "Margin Call" against the The Federal Reserve.

Provoked race relations instigated by the federal government may be, but within people, absent this instigation, I don't See it.

Provoked race relations instigated by the federal government may be, but within people, absent this instigation, I don't See it.

Provoked race relations instigated by the federal government may be, but within people, absent this instigation, I don't See it.

Agree

Need more research however I am against banning it. I am 100% fighting for U.S energy independence.

Agree

Need more research however I am against banning it. I am 100% fighting for U.S energy independence.

Agree

Need more research however I am against banning it. I am 100% fighting for U.S energy independence.

No more environmental laws. I am for defunding the administrative state and for Congress to do its job. None of this can be entertained until China is handled.

No more environmental laws. I am for defunding the administrative state and for Congress to do its job. None of this can be entertained until China is handled.

No more environmental laws. I am for defunding the administrative state and for Congress to do its job. None of this can be entertained until China is handled.

Very Conservative

I am a Constitutional Conservative that believes we need to go all the way back to the Universal Law of The Constitution. Like Trump, Candace Owens and so many I was once liberal. I had an "awakening" (as many say) to Conservatism by contrast, introspection and discernment. This is what I believe now makes me such an effective conservative voice. I don't rely on establishment programmed ideology or talking points. I will take on anyone on any issue and convert them as I've continuously done

Very Conservative

I am a Constitutional Conservative that believes we need to go all the way back to the Universal Law of The Constitution. Like Trump, Candace Owens and so many I was once liberal. I had an "awakening" (as many say) to Conservatism by contrast, introspection and discernment. This is what I believe now makes me such an effective conservative voice. I don't rely on establishment programmed ideology or talking points. I will take on anyone on any issue and convert them as I've continuously done

Very Conservative

I am a Constitutional Conservative that believes we need to go all the way back to the Universal Law of The Constitution. Like Trump, Candace Owens and so many I was once liberal. I had an "awakening" (as many say) to Conservatism by contrast, introspection and discernment. This is what I believe now makes me such an effective conservative voice. I don't rely on establishment programmed ideology or talking points. I will take on anyone on any issue and convert them as I've continuously done

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kohsjHMfjuU&t=81s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw2GmyN-r1c&t=1s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tn6vafZ7RM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kohsjHMfjuU&t=81s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw2GmyN-r1c&t=1s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tn6vafZ7RM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kohsjHMfjuU&t=81s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aw2GmyN-r1c&t=1s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tn6vafZ7RM

No.

No.

Priorities 1) Above and beyond "free and fair election integrity bills" to public election backtest. 2) Recall The Federal Reserve and unelected administrative state. 3) No more endless wars and ban war profiteering. 4) Abolish or significantly curtail the IRS.

Priorities 1) Above and beyond "free and fair election integrity bills" to public election backtest. 2) Recall The Federal Reserve and unelected administrative state. 3) No more endless wars and ban war profiteering. 4) Abolish or significantly curtail the IRS.

No.

Priorities 1) Above and beyond "free and fair election integrity bills" to public election backtest. 2) Recall The Federal Reserve and unelected administrative state. 3) No more endless wars and ban war profiteering. 4) Abolish or significantly curtail the IRS.

Neutral

Yes however with demonstrable negligence under a court of law as an exception.

Neutral

Yes however with demonstrable negligence under a court of law as an exception.

Strongly Agree

I don't disagree with the cause I simply believe it should be under the police budget and jurisdiction when such pertains to criminal action, thus adding more funds to the police.

Neutral

Yes however with demonstrable negligence under a court of law as an exception.

Strongly Agree

I don't disagree with the cause I simply believe it should be under the police budget and jurisdiction when such pertains to criminal action, thus adding more funds to the police.

Strongly Agree

I don't disagree with the cause I simply believe it should be under the police budget and jurisdiction when such pertains to criminal action, thus adding more funds to the police.

Constitutional Carry full stop. More over, I agree with the founding fathers we are to have such weapons equal to government potency and thus, until then brining back military equipment to the states and local military duty. It is deeply problematic We The People do not have jurisdiction of the Military equipment WE PAID FOR.

Constitutional Carry full stop. More over, I agree with the founding fathers we are to have such weapons equal to government potency and thus, until then brining back military equipment to the states and local military duty. It is deeply problematic We The People do not have jurisdiction of the Military equipment WE PAID FOR.

Strongly Disagree

Preposterous. I do believe we must make it a standard that every reported media gun crime must specify if the gun was legally obtained or assigned to them. See how quickly the narrative and accountability will shift. (Obama).

Constitutional Carry full stop. More over, I agree with the founding fathers we are to have such weapons equal to government potency and thus, until then brining back military equipment to the states and local military duty. It is deeply problematic We The People do not have jurisdiction of the Military equipment WE PAID FOR.

Strongly Disagree

Preposterous. I do believe we must make it a standard that every reported media gun crime must specify if the gun was legally obtained or assigned to them. See how quickly the narrative and accountability will shift. (Obama).

Strongly Disagree

Preposterous. I do believe we must make it a standard that every reported media gun crime must specify if the gun was legally obtained or assigned to them. See how quickly the narrative and accountability will shift. (Obama).