Dana Kuehn
Non-Partisan | Oklahoma
Candidate Profile
Leans Originalist
BIOGRAPHY
EDUCATION
Candidate did not provide
WORK & MILITARY
Candidate did not provide
AFFILIATIONS
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES HELD
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT
Candidate did not provide
SCORECARDS
CONSERVATIVE ORGANIZATIONS
2025
|85%†
LIBERAL ORGANIZATIONS
OTHER INFORMATION
Relating to LGBTQ & Sex Designation:
In Fowler v. Stitt (2026), Justice Kuehn joined the majority in ruling that Oklahoma law does not allow changes to the sex designation on birth certificates. Three transgender individuals sought to change their birth certificates to match their gender identities. The Court found that state law only allows specific types of changes and does not permit changes to sex designations. Kuehn did not write a separate opinion.
Recent Abortion-related opinions:
1. Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice v. Drummond (2023 OK 24)
In Drummond (March 2023), Justice Kuehn dissented when the Oklahoma Supreme Court recognized a limited state constitutional right to abortion when necessary to save the mother’s life. She argued that the Oklahoma Constitution contains no language establishing that right and that creating such a right should be left to the people or their elected representatives. This became the basis for her dissents in the later cases.
2. Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice v. Oklahoma (2023 OK 60)
In Oklahoma (May 2023), the Court struck down two abortion laws based on its earlier ruling in Drummond. Justice Kuehn dissented, maintaining that the Constitution does not establish a right to abortion. She also warned that applying the earlier ruling to these laws could expand its reach. Unlike Darby, she did not accept the result based on the earlier decision.
3. Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice v. Drummond (2023 OK 111)
In Drummond (November 2023), Justice Kuehn dissented from a decision blocking three laws regulating abortion while the case continued. Although she continued to disagree with the Court’s recognition of a constitutional right to abortion, she argued that the Court must fully apply its earlier ruling. She believed the majority failed to give that precedent its full effect when reviewing the challenged laws.
Relating to Church-Autonomy:
In Oklahoma Annual Conference of the United Methodist Church v. Timmons (2023), in which Justice Kuehn concurred, the Oklahoma Supreme Court held that a dispute over a church’s attempt to leave the United Methodist Church was an internal religious matter that courts could not decide. The Court held that the church autonomy doctrine prevented the district court from hearing the case and ordered it dismissed.
Relating to COVID & School Mask Mandates:
In Ritter v. State (2022), Justice Kuehn joined the majority in holding that a law limiting when public schools could require masks was unconstitutional in part. The law required the Governor to declare a state of emergency before schools could require masks. The Court ruled that this gave the Governor too much control over local school boards. Kuehn did not write a separate opinion.
QUESTIONNAIRE
RIGHT TO LIFE
Was Dobbs v. Jackson rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: In Dobbs, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the federal constitution does not confer a right to abortion.)
Did not answer
Does the federal Constitution support the right to physician assisted suicide? Please explain in light of Washington v. Glucksberg (1997).
Did not answer
Human life deserves legal protection from conception until natural death.
Did not answer
How do you view the judiciary’s role in matters of abortion regulation following Dobbs?
Did not answer
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
Do you believe religious liberty is at risk in the United States. If so, what is the judiciary's proper role in addressing this issue?
Did not answer
Does the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment require government to be strictly secular or does it allow for the nation's religious heritage?
Did not answer
Was Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: The U.S. Supreme Court held tha the state may not show religious hostility when enforcing anti-discrimination laws against a business owner.)
Did not answer
VALUES
Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.
Did not answer
What is your understanding of parental rights under the Constitution regarding the upbringing of children, particularly regarding choices about education and sexual identity?
Did not answer
Is gender identity a protected class under the Constitution? Please explain the constitutional basis for your view.
Did not answer
ABOUT YOU
Have you ever been convicted of a felony? If so, please explain.
Did not answer
Have you ever been penalized for sexual misconduct in either civil or criminal court? If so, please explain.
Did not answer
I voted in these primaries and general elections:
Did not answer
JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY
Describe your judicial philosophy.
Did not answer
Do you believe judges should primarily apply the law according to its original public meaning, or do you believe the law evolves over time to reflect contemporary values?
Did not answer
Which current or past U.S. Supreme Court justice best reflects your judicial philosophy?
Did not answer
Was Obergefell v. Hodges rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain. (Holding: The U.S. Supreme Court held Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses create a right for same-sex couples to marry.)
Did not answer
A. How should a judge approach a case where the constitutional or statutory text is clear on its face? B. Conversely, how should a judge proceed when the text is ambiguous or silent on a disputed issue?
Did not answer
What is your view of judicial restraint versus judicial activism? How do you define each?
Did not answer
What is the proper role of a judge?
Did not answer
When applying or interpreting the text of a statute or constitutional provision, is it ever proper for a judge to consider present day public opinion or consequences?
Did not answer
If precedent departs from the Constitution’s text or original meaning, should a judge follow it or correct the error? Please explain.
Did not answer
2ND AMENDMENT
What is your understanding of the Second Amendment’s right to keep and bear arms?
Did not answer
OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES
Which branch of government do you believe was intended to wield the most authority?
Did not answer
