Kerry Morris

Republican | New Mexico

Candidate Profile

Uncontested

BIOGRAPHY

Name

Kerry Morris


Party

Republican


Election Year

2022


Election

Primary


Race

Supreme Court, Position 2


Incumbent

No


Links

Kerry Morris websites
Kerry Morris phones
Kerry Morris email
Facebook

EDUCATION

University of NM, Albuquerque, BUS, 1977

University of NM Law School, Albuquerque, JD, 1981

Trinity Law School, San Diego, CA, ongoing

WORK & MILITARY

Morris Law Firm, P.A., Lawyer/Owner, 36

2nd Judicial District Atty, Assistant District Atty, 1.5

AFFILIATIONS

First Presbyterian Church, attendee, Chabad of NM

attendee, Congregation Albert, attendee

Hillside Community Church, member

POLITICAL OFFICES HELD

(Candidate did not provide)

POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT

Metro Judge, 1986

District Judge, 2004

Race

Previous Races

SELECTED CONTRIBUTIONS

CONSERVATIVE
GIVEN BY CANDIDATE (3)

Lindsey Graham (2015)

State Republican Party Organizations (2022)

WinRed (2022)

RECEIVED BY CANDIDATE (0)

OTHER INFORMATION

Kerry Morris is an attorney from Albuquerque. He previously served as a prosecutor for the Bernalillo County District Attorney’s Office

From His Campaign Website:

  • "Voters have a tremendous opportunity in 2022 to elect two candidates, who are committed to upholding the Constitution, to the New Mexico Supreme Court and two to the New Mexico Court of Appeals. If we elect these four Constitutionalist candidates, we will have four conservative voices on the most important courts in our state. Imagine what that means! Think of all the issues that may come before the courts that need these Constitutionalist voices."
  • In his "Why I'm running" section, Morris said, "We are living in a world, in which the mediocre are in charge and the talented, the doers, are despised. A society that values so called equity over equality, a society that would give lifesaving medicine not on the basis of need or science but on the basis of skin color. A society in which prosecutors will not prosecute criminals and judges let dangerous criminals roam free without bail. We conservative thinkers have an opportunity to change these things, but we are up against a powerful, committed opposition who are well funded and have the support of the media, most major corporations, and a host of others. We should not underestimate them and the power of George Soros and Zucker Bucks to control the elections in New Mexico. We must be committed to working together to present a united front against these forces. I’m running with three other statewide candidates for the NM Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals. These courts have the power and the opportunity to dictate that judges impose bail on dangerous criminals, and to redefine how many of the criminal laws are applied. But we need your help to get elected in November. Please help us today."

Morris responded to iVoterGuide's 2020 questionnaire.

Info from Other Sources:

  • Morris told Ballotpedia in 2020 that he was running for Supreme Court office because he saw himself as a problem solver, first, a peacemaker between parties??, and a trial lawyer last. Said he wanted to bring his experience to serve on the Supreme Court to benefit the state. Said in Question 3 that he would know he succeeded as justice on the court because people would not longer see the Court as political and the judges as "politicians in robes." Said in response to Question 4 that he was running to place the law before politics which meant 1) a commitment to putting aside his personal political views and beliefs when hearing cases 2) disregarding the political views and expressed beliefs of the parties in the case before him and 3) "applying the law as written using the original meaning and context of the words used in the Constitution and the laws that are duly enacted by the legislature at the time they were drafted. By this, I mean that I am committed to not legislating from the bench. I will not allow the New Mexico Supreme Court to act as a mini legislature, writing and rewriting the laws of our state instead of the peoples' duly elected representatives."
  • He told the Albuquerque Journal that "I know what it means when a court decision is made based on the judges’ personal or political views rather than the law. e.g. $5,000 fine for violating the governor’s closure order, rather than the statute that limits the fine to $100. If elected, as a justice of the New Mexico Supreme Court, I will be committed to always putting the law before politics. I bring a commitment to follow the law as written, based on the original meaning of the words used by the legislature when the law was duly enacted, thereby bringing a consistent application of the law to the wide variety of cases that come before the court."

QUESTIONNAIRE

VALUES

I agree with Critical Race Theory (CRT) which asserts that the institutions in the United States are fundamentally racist.

Did not answer

Judeo-Christian values established a framework of morality that is necessary for our system of limited government.

Did not answer

Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.

Did not answer

What types of pro bono work have you done?

Did not answer


ABOUT YOU

Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized in either civil or criminal court for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.

Did not answer

What education or experience qualifies you to hold the office for which you seek election?

Did not answer

Why should the voters choose you?

Did not answer

I voted in these primaries and general elections:

Did not answer


JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY

Justices should not interpret the federal and state constitutions as living documents, but should use a textualist and originalist approach to interpretation.

Did not answer

What is the proper use of legislative history in interpreting statutory law?

Did not answer

Which current or past U.S. Supreme Court justice best reflects your judicial philosophy?

Did not answer

How should a court address the balance between public health and individual freedoms in the time of a pandemic?

Did not answer

In light of the case Bostock v. Clayton County, in which the U.S. Supreme Court interpreted the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include a prohibition on sexual-orientation discrimination, which justice’s opinion most closely aligns with your own opinion?

Did not answer

What role (if any) does a judge have in maintaining the separation of church and state?

Did not answer

Religious liberty is at risk in the United States and deserves the highest level of protection in the law.

Did not answer

When should a judge overturn past court decisions?

Did not answer

How should a judge determine which rights are protected by the Constitution even though they are not specifically mentioned?

Did not answer

What legal principles should a court consider when evaluating parents’ objection to their child obtaining medical procedures or drugs designed to affirm the child’s desired gender?

Did not answer

What principles should guide a court’s analysis of whether your state’s constitution gives terminally ill patients a right to assisted suicide?

Did not answer

Would you describe your judicial philosophy as originalist, living constitutionalist, or something else?

Did not answer

If you are not already receiving our emails, stay up to date with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.

I agree to receive text messages at the phone number provided.