Christine Scott

No Party Affiliation | Florida

Candidate Profile*

Moderate

*Additional information appears below for educational purposes; however, only data received prior to the candidate deadline was considered during Panel Evaluation.

BIOGRAPHY

Name

Christine Scott


Party

No Party Affiliation


Election Year

2022


Election

General


Race

U.S. Rep., Dist. 23


Incumbent

No


Links

Christine Scott websites

EDUCATION

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

University of Oregon, Eugene

WORK & MILITARY

Candidate did not provide

AFFILIATIONS

Palm Beach County Library, Member, Republican Party

Member - Past, Norton Museum, Member - Past

Women's Center, University of Minnesota, Volunteer - Past, Aids Project Los Angeles

Volunteer - Past, Los Angeles County Museum of Art, Member - Past

Democrat Party, Member - Past

POLITICAL OFFICES HELD

Fine Arts Advisory Board of West Hollywood, CA (Appointed by the Mayor), 1990-1991

Chairperson of the Urban Art Subcommittee of the Fine Arts Advisory Board of West Hollywood, CA (Elected by Majority of Board Members), 1990-1991

POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT

Candidate did not provide

Race

OTHER INFORMATION

QUESTIONNAIRE*

*Additional information was received after the evaluation was assigned and was not considered in the Panel Evaluations, therefore it is for additional educational purposes only.
RIGHT TO LIFE

Abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, should not receive funds from federal, state, or local governments (including Title X grants).

Neutral

All abortions need to be addressed within the first 12 weeks. All pharmacies within the U.S. should offer the day after pill on a sliding scale to ensure women of any income level has immediate access to such pills. Abortions need to be availble on a sliding scale. Abortion providers cannot delay appts forcing women to have later term abortions. Delayed abortions stemming from an abortion clinic's increased income based on sale of later term fetus sales for science should not be permitted.

Abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, should not receive funds from federal, state, or local governments (including Title X grants).

Neutral

All abortions need to be addressed within the first 12 weeks. All pharmacies within the U.S. should offer the day after pill on a sliding scale to ensure women of any income level has immediate access to such pills. Abortions need to be availble on a sliding scale. Abortion providers cannot delay appts forcing women to have later term abortions. Delayed abortions stemming from an abortion clinic's increased income based on sale of later term fetus sales for science should not be permitted.

Abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, should not receive funds from federal, state, or local governments (including Title X grants).

Neutral

All abortions need to be addressed within the first 12 weeks. All pharmacies within the U.S. should offer the day after pill on a sliding scale to ensure women of any income level has immediate access to such pills. Abortions need to be availble on a sliding scale. Abortion providers cannot delay appts forcing women to have later term abortions. Delayed abortions stemming from an abortion clinic's increased income based on sale of later term fetus sales for science should not be permitted.

Abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, should not receive funds from federal, state, or local governments (including Title X grants).

Neutral

All abortions need to be addressed within the first 12 weeks. All pharmacies within the U.S. should offer the day after pill on a sliding scale to ensure women of any income level has immediate access to such pills. Abortions need to be availble on a sliding scale. Abortion providers cannot delay appts forcing women to have later term abortions. Delayed abortions stemming from an abortion clinic's increased income based on sale of later term fetus sales for science should not be permitted.

I support 'aid in dying' laws which legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Disagree

I support 'aid in dying' laws which legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Disagree

I support 'aid in dying' laws which legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Disagree

I support 'aid in dying' laws which legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Disagree

Under what circumstances should abortion be allowed?

First 12 weeks of pregnancy and severe, life threatening complications that put risk to the mother during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. Incest and rape are known within the first 12 wks and can be dealt with accordingly.

Under what circumstances should abortion be allowed?

First 12 weeks of pregnancy and severe, life threatening complications that put risk to the mother during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. Incest and rape are known within the first 12 wks and can be dealt with accordingly.

Under what circumstances should abortion be allowed?

First 12 weeks of pregnancy and severe, life threatening complications that put risk to the mother during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. Incest and rape are known within the first 12 wks and can be dealt with accordingly.

Under what circumstances should abortion be allowed?

First 12 weeks of pregnancy and severe, life threatening complications that put risk to the mother during the 2nd and 3rd trimesters. Incest and rape are known within the first 12 wks and can be dealt with accordingly.


ECONOMY

Redistribution of income is needed to lessen the gap between the wealthy and working classes.

Agree

Businesses and intellectual property that were stolen by rogue tech tyrants, and corporate oppression and overreach need to be shut down. Those funds need to be used to make the victims whole who lost their businesses and IP through corporate theft. All monopolies need to be dismantled because they do not serve the people, rather they attempt to enslave the people. Such businesses destroy the fabric of America. Elites who stole from sm biz thru tech need their assets seized.

Redistribution of income is needed to lessen the gap between the wealthy and working classes.

Agree

Businesses and intellectual property that were stolen by rogue tech tyrants, and corporate oppression and overreach need to be shut down. Those funds need to be used to make the victims whole who lost their businesses and IP through corporate theft. All monopolies need to be dismantled because they do not serve the people, rather they attempt to enslave the people. Such businesses destroy the fabric of America. Elites who stole from sm biz thru tech need their assets seized.

Redistribution of income is needed to lessen the gap between the wealthy and working classes.

Agree

Businesses and intellectual property that were stolen by rogue tech tyrants, and corporate oppression and overreach need to be shut down. Those funds need to be used to make the victims whole who lost their businesses and IP through corporate theft. All monopolies need to be dismantled because they do not serve the people, rather they attempt to enslave the people. Such businesses destroy the fabric of America. Elites who stole from sm biz thru tech need their assets seized.

Redistribution of income is needed to lessen the gap between the wealthy and working classes.

Agree

Businesses and intellectual property that were stolen by rogue tech tyrants, and corporate oppression and overreach need to be shut down. Those funds need to be used to make the victims whole who lost their businesses and IP through corporate theft. All monopolies need to be dismantled because they do not serve the people, rather they attempt to enslave the people. Such businesses destroy the fabric of America. Elites who stole from sm biz thru tech need their assets seized.

The government should cut spending in order to reduce the national debt.

Strongly Agree

Funding wars in foreign countries does not benefit American citizens. We must keep the entitlement programs whole (ie. Social Security, VA benefits, Medicaid, Medicare, etc). Foreign funding of 'climate change' appear to be slush funds for the pockets of the elites. Funding forever wars, WHO, WTO, the UN and vague, sensationalized 'climate' issues is a huge and unnecessary drain on the US National Debt.

The government should cut spending in order to reduce the national debt.

Strongly Agree

Funding wars in foreign countries does not benefit American citizens. We must keep the entitlement programs whole (ie. Social Security, VA benefits, Medicaid, Medicare, etc). Foreign funding of 'climate change' appear to be slush funds for the pockets of the elites. Funding forever wars, WHO, WTO, the UN and vague, sensationalized 'climate' issues is a huge and unnecessary drain on the US National Debt.

The government should cut spending in order to reduce the national debt.

Strongly Agree

Funding wars in foreign countries does not benefit American citizens. We must keep the entitlement programs whole (ie. Social Security, VA benefits, Medicaid, Medicare, etc). Foreign funding of 'climate change' appear to be slush funds for the pockets of the elites. Funding forever wars, WHO, WTO, the UN and vague, sensationalized 'climate' issues is a huge and unnecessary drain on the US National Debt.

The government should cut spending in order to reduce the national debt.

Strongly Agree

Funding wars in foreign countries does not benefit American citizens. We must keep the entitlement programs whole (ie. Social Security, VA benefits, Medicaid, Medicare, etc). Foreign funding of 'climate change' appear to be slush funds for the pockets of the elites. Funding forever wars, WHO, WTO, the UN and vague, sensationalized 'climate' issues is a huge and unnecessary drain on the US National Debt.

What changes, if any, should be made to the tax code?

There should be a flat tax of 15% for all corporations, with no subsidies.

What changes, if any, should be made to the tax code?

There should be a flat tax of 15% for all corporations, with no subsidies.

What changes, if any, should be made to the tax code?

There should be a flat tax of 15% for all corporations, with no subsidies.

What changes, if any, should be made to the tax code?

There should be a flat tax of 15% for all corporations, with no subsidies.


RELIGIOUS LIBERTY

Religious liberty is at risk in the United States and deserves the highest level of protection in the law.

Strongly Agree

This is a First Amendment right of all Americans. It must be protected.

Religious liberty is at risk in the United States and deserves the highest level of protection in the law.

Strongly Agree

This is a First Amendment right of all Americans. It must be protected.

Religious liberty is at risk in the United States and deserves the highest level of protection in the law.

Strongly Agree

This is a First Amendment right of all Americans. It must be protected.

Religious liberty is at risk in the United States and deserves the highest level of protection in the law.

Strongly Agree

This is a First Amendment right of all Americans. It must be protected.

Individuals and businesses should be required to provide services even if it would violate their moral and/or religious beliefs.

Disagree

A business can chose not to make cakes or to only sell oranges, but not apples. It cannot distriminate against people based on what they are wearing, the color of their skin or their political views. If the doors are open to one, the doors are open to all. You can't force someone to make a particular product they are against, but they cannot infringe upon a customer's person freedom to choose what that person wears, including a mask. That is a personal choice and not be infringed upon.

Individuals and businesses should be required to provide services even if it would violate their moral and/or religious beliefs.

Disagree

A business can chose not to make cakes or to only sell oranges, but not apples. It cannot distriminate against people based on what they are wearing, the color of their skin or their political views. If the doors are open to one, the doors are open to all. You can't force someone to make a particular product they are against, but they cannot infringe upon a customer's person freedom to choose what that person wears, including a mask. That is a personal choice and not be infringed upon.

Individuals and businesses should be required to provide services even if it would violate their moral and/or religious beliefs.

Disagree

A business can chose not to make cakes or to only sell oranges, but not apples. It cannot distriminate against people based on what they are wearing, the color of their skin or their political views. If the doors are open to one, the doors are open to all. You can't force someone to make a particular product they are against, but they cannot infringe upon a customer's person freedom to choose what that person wears, including a mask. That is a personal choice and not be infringed upon.

Individuals and businesses should be required to provide services even if it would violate their moral and/or religious beliefs.

Disagree

A business can chose not to make cakes or to only sell oranges, but not apples. It cannot distriminate against people based on what they are wearing, the color of their skin or their political views. If the doors are open to one, the doors are open to all. You can't force someone to make a particular product they are against, but they cannot infringe upon a customer's person freedom to choose what that person wears, including a mask. That is a personal choice and not be infringed upon.

What should be the relationship between the church and the state?

Did not answer

What should be the relationship between the church and the state?

Did not answer

What should be the relationship between the church and the state?

Did not answer

What should be the relationship between the church and the state?

Did not answer


HEALTHCARE

Under what circumstances (if any) should a government, school, or employer be allowed to require vaccinations?

None. My body. My choice. Keep your laws off my body. What if the government, school or employer was wrong. It would be you who would suffer from that poor decision. No one has the right to force you to get vaccinated. You aren't their slave. You aren't their property. It is none of their business what you do with your body or your health. Another person's bad choices should not be forced on you, just like their good choices can't be forced on you. Additionally, only Congress and State Legislatures have the right to make laws. Any lower body of government, a school or an employer has the right to make laws. If they pretend to have that right, they are overreaching their authority. It is an abuse of power. That individual needs to be removed or that board dismantled. A 'Mandate' is nothing more than a strong suggestion. No one has to follow mandates. Law enforcement never had the right to try to enforce them either directly or indirectly. The United States of America is based on personal freedoms and choices - no dictatorial rule by oppressive overloards.

Under what circumstances (if any) should a government, school, or employer be allowed to require vaccinations?

None. My body. My choice. Keep your laws off my body. What if the government, school or employer was wrong. It would be you who would suffer from that poor decision. No one has the right to force you to get vaccinated. You aren't their slave. You aren't their property. It is none of their business what you do with your body or your health. Another person's bad choices should not be forced on you, just like their good choices can't be forced on you. Additionally, only Congress and State Legislatures have the right to make laws. Any lower body of government, a school or an employer has the right to make laws. If they pretend to have that right, they are overreaching their authority. It is an abuse of power. That individual needs to be removed or that board dismantled. A 'Mandate' is nothing more than a strong suggestion. No one has to follow mandates. Law enforcement never had the right to try to enforce them either directly or indirectly. The United States of America is based on personal freedoms and choices - no dictatorial rule by oppressive overloards.

Under what circumstances (if any) should a government, school, or employer be allowed to require vaccinations?

None. My body. My choice. Keep your laws off my body. What if the government, school or employer was wrong. It would be you who would suffer from that poor decision. No one has the right to force you to get vaccinated. You aren't their slave. You aren't their property. It is none of their business what you do with your body or your health. Another person's bad choices should not be forced on you, just like their good choices can't be forced on you. Additionally, only Congress and State Legislatures have the right to make laws. Any lower body of government, a school or an employer has the right to make laws. If they pretend to have that right, they are overreaching their authority. It is an abuse of power. That individual needs to be removed or that board dismantled. A 'Mandate' is nothing more than a strong suggestion. No one has to follow mandates. Law enforcement never had the right to try to enforce them either directly or indirectly. The United States of America is based on personal freedoms and choices - no dictatorial rule by oppressive overloards.

Under what circumstances (if any) should a government, school, or employer be allowed to require vaccinations?

None. My body. My choice. Keep your laws off my body. What if the government, school or employer was wrong. It would be you who would suffer from that poor decision. No one has the right to force you to get vaccinated. You aren't their slave. You aren't their property. It is none of their business what you do with your body or your health. Another person's bad choices should not be forced on you, just like their good choices can't be forced on you. Additionally, only Congress and State Legislatures have the right to make laws. Any lower body of government, a school or an employer has the right to make laws. If they pretend to have that right, they are overreaching their authority. It is an abuse of power. That individual needs to be removed or that board dismantled. A 'Mandate' is nothing more than a strong suggestion. No one has to follow mandates. Law enforcement never had the right to try to enforce them either directly or indirectly. The United States of America is based on personal freedoms and choices - no dictatorial rule by oppressive overloards.

What most closely matches your view on healthcare: A) Healthcare for all should be guaranteed and funded by the government with no private healthcare option. (includes "universal healthcare," "medicare for all," etc.) B) Healthcare insurance funded by the government should be available for all who want it, along with private healthcare options. C) Medicaid and Medicare should remain available, but no other taxpayer-funded programs are necessary. D)Tax-payer funded health care should be abolished in all forms, and Medicaid and Medicare should be de-funded.

Somewhere around B and C. We want to make sure everyone has access to healthcare, but we do not want healthcare dictated to us. Your health care choices are not dictated by a doctor, rather those choices are yours. If I want to discuss your health with a doctor, then such an option needs to be available, but I believe to a large degree this is the case. Maybe we need to work on how safe and caring these options are. I've heard of groups of doctors who do not access health insurance, but instead offer costs at the rate of what they make after the insurance company takes their cut. This seems like a much better option for both the doctor and the patient and it eliminates the insurance company altogether. It would also be helpful if there were more holistic doctors. Many have been weeded out by corporate lobbyists maneuvering in congressional halls. That is harmful to the health options of individuals. We must people the people and their choices first. Big Pharma doesn't necessarily concern itself with the health of the patient.. if it did, there wouldn't be the opiod and fentanyl crisis we are currently experiencing. Holistic approaches will also decrease the need for perscription drugs - most of which come from China. For those on disability, perscription drugs should not cost more than $3 per perscription, per month. For Americans as a whole, perscription drug prices should be tied to the lowest price for that drug, offered by that company, in any other country in the world. So, if a drug is offered in Panama for $5 by a drug company, then that is the same price the drug must be offered here in the States. Drug companies need to stop price guaging the American people.

What most closely matches your view on healthcare: A) Healthcare for all should be guaranteed and funded by the government with no private healthcare option. (includes "universal healthcare," "medicare for all," etc.) B) Healthcare insurance funded by the government should be available for all who want it, along with private healthcare options. C) Medicaid and Medicare should remain available, but no other taxpayer-funded programs are necessary. D)Tax-payer funded health care should be abolished in all forms, and Medicaid and Medicare should be de-funded.

Somewhere around B and C. We want to make sure everyone has access to healthcare, but we do not want healthcare dictated to us. Your health care choices are not dictated by a doctor, rather those choices are yours. If I want to discuss your health with a doctor, then such an option needs to be available, but I believe to a large degree this is the case. Maybe we need to work on how safe and caring these options are. I've heard of groups of doctors who do not access health insurance, but instead offer costs at the rate of what they make after the insurance company takes their cut. This seems like a much better option for both the doctor and the patient and it eliminates the insurance company altogether. It would also be helpful if there were more holistic doctors. Many have been weeded out by corporate lobbyists maneuvering in congressional halls. That is harmful to the health options of individuals. We must people the people and their choices first. Big Pharma doesn't necessarily concern itself with the health of the patient.. if it did, there wouldn't be the opiod and fentanyl crisis we are currently experiencing. Holistic approaches will also decrease the need for perscription drugs - most of which come from China. For those on disability, perscription drugs should not cost more than $3 per perscription, per month. For Americans as a whole, perscription drug prices should be tied to the lowest price for that drug, offered by that company, in any other country in the world. So, if a drug is offered in Panama for $5 by a drug company, then that is the same price the drug must be offered here in the States. Drug companies need to stop price guaging the American people.

What most closely matches your view on healthcare: A) Healthcare for all should be guaranteed and funded by the government with no private healthcare option. (includes "universal healthcare," "medicare for all," etc.) B) Healthcare insurance funded by the government should be available for all who want it, along with private healthcare options. C) Medicaid and Medicare should remain available, but no other taxpayer-funded programs are necessary. D)Tax-payer funded health care should be abolished in all forms, and Medicaid and Medicare should be de-funded.

Somewhere around B and C. We want to make sure everyone has access to healthcare, but we do not want healthcare dictated to us. Your health care choices are not dictated by a doctor, rather those choices are yours. If I want to discuss your health with a doctor, then such an option needs to be available, but I believe to a large degree this is the case. Maybe we need to work on how safe and caring these options are. I've heard of groups of doctors who do not access health insurance, but instead offer costs at the rate of what they make after the insurance company takes their cut. This seems like a much better option for both the doctor and the patient and it eliminates the insurance company altogether. It would also be helpful if there were more holistic doctors. Many have been weeded out by corporate lobbyists maneuvering in congressional halls. That is harmful to the health options of individuals. We must people the people and their choices first. Big Pharma doesn't necessarily concern itself with the health of the patient.. if it did, there wouldn't be the opiod and fentanyl crisis we are currently experiencing. Holistic approaches will also decrease the need for perscription drugs - most of which come from China. For those on disability, perscription drugs should not cost more than $3 per perscription, per month. For Americans as a whole, perscription drug prices should be tied to the lowest price for that drug, offered by that company, in any other country in the world. So, if a drug is offered in Panama for $5 by a drug company, then that is the same price the drug must be offered here in the States. Drug companies need to stop price guaging the American people.

What most closely matches your view on healthcare: A) Healthcare for all should be guaranteed and funded by the government with no private healthcare option. (includes "universal healthcare," "medicare for all," etc.) B) Healthcare insurance funded by the government should be available for all who want it, along with private healthcare options. C) Medicaid and Medicare should remain available, but no other taxpayer-funded programs are necessary. D)Tax-payer funded health care should be abolished in all forms, and Medicaid and Medicare should be de-funded.

Somewhere around B and C. We want to make sure everyone has access to healthcare, but we do not want healthcare dictated to us. Your health care choices are not dictated by a doctor, rather those choices are yours. If I want to discuss your health with a doctor, then such an option needs to be available, but I believe to a large degree this is the case. Maybe we need to work on how safe and caring these options are. I've heard of groups of doctors who do not access health insurance, but instead offer costs at the rate of what they make after the insurance company takes their cut. This seems like a much better option for both the doctor and the patient and it eliminates the insurance company altogether. It would also be helpful if there were more holistic doctors. Many have been weeded out by corporate lobbyists maneuvering in congressional halls. That is harmful to the health options of individuals. We must people the people and their choices first. Big Pharma doesn't necessarily concern itself with the health of the patient.. if it did, there wouldn't be the opiod and fentanyl crisis we are currently experiencing. Holistic approaches will also decrease the need for perscription drugs - most of which come from China. For those on disability, perscription drugs should not cost more than $3 per perscription, per month. For Americans as a whole, perscription drug prices should be tied to the lowest price for that drug, offered by that company, in any other country in the world. So, if a drug is offered in Panama for $5 by a drug company, then that is the same price the drug must be offered here in the States. Drug companies need to stop price guaging the American people.


NATIONAL SECURITY

With regard to America's foreign policy, which view most closely resembles yours: A) The United States should intervene whenever freedom is threatened. B) The United States should selectively help countries trying to grow democracy and fight tyranny. C) The United States has become too involved in others' policies and should remain focused on issues regarding our own sovereignty unless in imminent danger. D) The United States should stay out of foreign conflicts completely.

C. And if we intervene, budgets need to be detailed to the penny before bills are voted on and funds are dispersed... The U.S. should not hand over money to other government entities. If there is 'imminent danger' then we can disperse the funds ourselves and need to have that control. Every dollar needs to be audited and until each dollar is accounted for, no additional funds IF actually needed should be further dispersed. Warfare is being treated like slush funds for the corrupt and elite. The U.S. populace does not want to fund corruption.

With regard to America's foreign policy, which view most closely resembles yours: A) The United States should intervene whenever freedom is threatened. B) The United States should selectively help countries trying to grow democracy and fight tyranny. C) The United States has become too involved in others' policies and should remain focused on issues regarding our own sovereignty unless in imminent danger. D) The United States should stay out of foreign conflicts completely.

C. And if we intervene, budgets need to be detailed to the penny before bills are voted on and funds are dispersed... The U.S. should not hand over money to other government entities. If there is 'imminent danger' then we can disperse the funds ourselves and need to have that control. Every dollar needs to be audited and until each dollar is accounted for, no additional funds IF actually needed should be further dispersed. Warfare is being treated like slush funds for the corrupt and elite. The U.S. populace does not want to fund corruption.

With regard to America's foreign policy, which view most closely resembles yours: A) The United States should intervene whenever freedom is threatened. B) The United States should selectively help countries trying to grow democracy and fight tyranny. C) The United States has become too involved in others' policies and should remain focused on issues regarding our own sovereignty unless in imminent danger. D) The United States should stay out of foreign conflicts completely.

C. And if we intervene, budgets need to be detailed to the penny before bills are voted on and funds are dispersed... The U.S. should not hand over money to other government entities. If there is 'imminent danger' then we can disperse the funds ourselves and need to have that control. Every dollar needs to be audited and until each dollar is accounted for, no additional funds IF actually needed should be further dispersed. Warfare is being treated like slush funds for the corrupt and elite. The U.S. populace does not want to fund corruption.

With regard to America's foreign policy, which view most closely resembles yours: A) The United States should intervene whenever freedom is threatened. B) The United States should selectively help countries trying to grow democracy and fight tyranny. C) The United States has become too involved in others' policies and should remain focused on issues regarding our own sovereignty unless in imminent danger. D) The United States should stay out of foreign conflicts completely.

C. And if we intervene, budgets need to be detailed to the penny before bills are voted on and funds are dispersed... The U.S. should not hand over money to other government entities. If there is 'imminent danger' then we can disperse the funds ourselves and need to have that control. Every dollar needs to be audited and until each dollar is accounted for, no additional funds IF actually needed should be further dispersed. Warfare is being treated like slush funds for the corrupt and elite. The U.S. populace does not want to fund corruption.

I support the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement to pressure Israel to withdraw from occupied territories, remove the separation barrier in the West Bank, allow full equality for Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel, and promote the rights of Palestinian refugees.

Strongly Disagree

I believe in 1948 Palestine was offered the opportunity to become it's own country. It declined. The territorial fight is not one-sided. Yes, Israel is stronger and has more of an ability to make an impact with it's reaction and so that is what we hear about but that doesn't mean the Palestinians haven't been in this fight. There needs to be an agreement regarding the disputed land and border issue.

I support the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement to pressure Israel to withdraw from occupied territories, remove the separation barrier in the West Bank, allow full equality for Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel, and promote the rights of Palestinian refugees.

Strongly Disagree

I believe in 1948 Palestine was offered the opportunity to become it's own country. It declined. The territorial fight is not one-sided. Yes, Israel is stronger and has more of an ability to make an impact with it's reaction and so that is what we hear about but that doesn't mean the Palestinians haven't been in this fight. There needs to be an agreement regarding the disputed land and border issue.

I support the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement to pressure Israel to withdraw from occupied territories, remove the separation barrier in the West Bank, allow full equality for Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel, and promote the rights of Palestinian refugees.

Strongly Disagree

I believe in 1948 Palestine was offered the opportunity to become it's own country. It declined. The territorial fight is not one-sided. Yes, Israel is stronger and has more of an ability to make an impact with it's reaction and so that is what we hear about but that doesn't mean the Palestinians haven't been in this fight. There needs to be an agreement regarding the disputed land and border issue.

I support the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement to pressure Israel to withdraw from occupied territories, remove the separation barrier in the West Bank, allow full equality for Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel, and promote the rights of Palestinian refugees.

Strongly Disagree

I believe in 1948 Palestine was offered the opportunity to become it's own country. It declined. The territorial fight is not one-sided. Yes, Israel is stronger and has more of an ability to make an impact with it's reaction and so that is what we hear about but that doesn't mean the Palestinians haven't been in this fight. There needs to be an agreement regarding the disputed land and border issue.

The Chinese Communist Party poses serious military, cyber security, intellectual property, and global economic threats to the United States.

Strongly Agree

This is a huge concern. Many top U.S. companies have crumbled over their deals with China. China's current war doctrine claims it is at war with the U.S. It uses unconventional warfare. It has a budget for bribery. It's military becomes stronger, while the Wuhan Virus Vaccine appears to be killing Americans and harming the health of our military. Just because the U.S. military doesn't fight like that, doesn't mean China has the same ethics or moral standing. Reparations are ndd for IP theft.

The Chinese Communist Party poses serious military, cyber security, intellectual property, and global economic threats to the United States.

Strongly Agree

This is a huge concern. Many top U.S. companies have crumbled over their deals with China. China's current war doctrine claims it is at war with the U.S. It uses unconventional warfare. It has a budget for bribery. It's military becomes stronger, while the Wuhan Virus Vaccine appears to be killing Americans and harming the health of our military. Just because the U.S. military doesn't fight like that, doesn't mean China has the same ethics or moral standing. Reparations are ndd for IP theft.

The Chinese Communist Party poses serious military, cyber security, intellectual property, and global economic threats to the United States.

Strongly Agree

This is a huge concern. Many top U.S. companies have crumbled over their deals with China. China's current war doctrine claims it is at war with the U.S. It uses unconventional warfare. It has a budget for bribery. It's military becomes stronger, while the Wuhan Virus Vaccine appears to be killing Americans and harming the health of our military. Just because the U.S. military doesn't fight like that, doesn't mean China has the same ethics or moral standing. Reparations are ndd for IP theft.

The Chinese Communist Party poses serious military, cyber security, intellectual property, and global economic threats to the United States.

Strongly Agree

This is a huge concern. Many top U.S. companies have crumbled over their deals with China. China's current war doctrine claims it is at war with the U.S. It uses unconventional warfare. It has a budget for bribery. It's military becomes stronger, while the Wuhan Virus Vaccine appears to be killing Americans and harming the health of our military. Just because the U.S. military doesn't fight like that, doesn't mean China has the same ethics or moral standing. Reparations are ndd for IP theft.

What should the United States do to help eradicate the threat of Islamic terrorism?

For starters, we should vet them better to keep them out of the U.S and we should stop sending Iran billions of dollars of cash on crates. Funding terrorists who hate Americans does not protect our country.

What should the United States do to help eradicate the threat of Islamic terrorism?

For starters, we should vet them better to keep them out of the U.S and we should stop sending Iran billions of dollars of cash on crates. Funding terrorists who hate Americans does not protect our country.

What should the United States do to help eradicate the threat of Islamic terrorism?

For starters, we should vet them better to keep them out of the U.S and we should stop sending Iran billions of dollars of cash on crates. Funding terrorists who hate Americans does not protect our country.

What should the United States do to help eradicate the threat of Islamic terrorism?

For starters, we should vet them better to keep them out of the U.S and we should stop sending Iran billions of dollars of cash on crates. Funding terrorists who hate Americans does not protect our country.


IMMIGRATION

The U.S. should do more to physically secure the southern border.

Strongly Agree

The U.S. should immediately finish the wall. Before Trump ran for office, the Democrats wanted border security at the Southern border. This is about the American People and national security. It should not be used as a political tool. It is essential that we protect the Southern border immediately! We should work to ensure immigrants gain the appropriate paperwork, in their own country, before coming to the U.S. They should also have a basic understanding of the English language.

The U.S. should do more to physically secure the southern border.

Strongly Agree

The U.S. should immediately finish the wall. Before Trump ran for office, the Democrats wanted border security at the Southern border. This is about the American People and national security. It should not be used as a political tool. It is essential that we protect the Southern border immediately! We should work to ensure immigrants gain the appropriate paperwork, in their own country, before coming to the U.S. They should also have a basic understanding of the English language.

The U.S. should do more to physically secure the southern border.

Strongly Agree

The U.S. should immediately finish the wall. Before Trump ran for office, the Democrats wanted border security at the Southern border. This is about the American People and national security. It should not be used as a political tool. It is essential that we protect the Southern border immediately! We should work to ensure immigrants gain the appropriate paperwork, in their own country, before coming to the U.S. They should also have a basic understanding of the English language.

The U.S. should do more to physically secure the southern border.

Strongly Agree

The U.S. should immediately finish the wall. Before Trump ran for office, the Democrats wanted border security at the Southern border. This is about the American People and national security. It should not be used as a political tool. It is essential that we protect the Southern border immediately! We should work to ensure immigrants gain the appropriate paperwork, in their own country, before coming to the U.S. They should also have a basic understanding of the English language.

State and federal funds shall be denied to any public or private entity, such as a sanctuary city, that is not in compliance with immigration laws.

Strongly Agree

Attempts to overthrow our government by ignoring the laws of the country is treason. All government funds should be denied to those that refuse to abide by our laws.

State and federal funds shall be denied to any public or private entity, such as a sanctuary city, that is not in compliance with immigration laws.

Strongly Agree

Attempts to overthrow our government by ignoring the laws of the country is treason. All government funds should be denied to those that refuse to abide by our laws.

State and federal funds shall be denied to any public or private entity, such as a sanctuary city, that is not in compliance with immigration laws.

Strongly Agree

Attempts to overthrow our government by ignoring the laws of the country is treason. All government funds should be denied to those that refuse to abide by our laws.

State and federal funds shall be denied to any public or private entity, such as a sanctuary city, that is not in compliance with immigration laws.

Strongly Agree

Attempts to overthrow our government by ignoring the laws of the country is treason. All government funds should be denied to those that refuse to abide by our laws.

Who should be allowed to immigrate to the U.S. and under what circumstances?

At the moment, we might consider a 5-year moratorium on all immigration, without exception, to settle things down and see where we are at. Seasonal workers, such as farm workers, should be approved within their government - flown in for the season and flown out after the season. All immigrants should be vetted before entry. Any illegal entry should be met with swift return at the cost of their home country. Tech visas should be abolished immediately. We have plenty of Americans fully capable of doing these jobs. It's unlawful to hire foreigners when there are American citizens seeking the same jobs. Any job sites favoring foreigners over U.S. citizens need to be dismantled.

Who should be allowed to immigrate to the U.S. and under what circumstances?

At the moment, we might consider a 5-year moratorium on all immigration, without exception, to settle things down and see where we are at. Seasonal workers, such as farm workers, should be approved within their government - flown in for the season and flown out after the season. All immigrants should be vetted before entry. Any illegal entry should be met with swift return at the cost of their home country. Tech visas should be abolished immediately. We have plenty of Americans fully capable of doing these jobs. It's unlawful to hire foreigners when there are American citizens seeking the same jobs. Any job sites favoring foreigners over U.S. citizens need to be dismantled.

Who should be allowed to immigrate to the U.S. and under what circumstances?

At the moment, we might consider a 5-year moratorium on all immigration, without exception, to settle things down and see where we are at. Seasonal workers, such as farm workers, should be approved within their government - flown in for the season and flown out after the season. All immigrants should be vetted before entry. Any illegal entry should be met with swift return at the cost of their home country. Tech visas should be abolished immediately. We have plenty of Americans fully capable of doing these jobs. It's unlawful to hire foreigners when there are American citizens seeking the same jobs. Any job sites favoring foreigners over U.S. citizens need to be dismantled.

Who should be allowed to immigrate to the U.S. and under what circumstances?

At the moment, we might consider a 5-year moratorium on all immigration, without exception, to settle things down and see where we are at. Seasonal workers, such as farm workers, should be approved within their government - flown in for the season and flown out after the season. All immigrants should be vetted before entry. Any illegal entry should be met with swift return at the cost of their home country. Tech visas should be abolished immediately. We have plenty of Americans fully capable of doing these jobs. It's unlawful to hire foreigners when there are American citizens seeking the same jobs. Any job sites favoring foreigners over U.S. citizens need to be dismantled.


VALUES

Sexual orientation and gender identity should be protected classes in non-discrimination laws.

Neutral

They already are protected. That doesn't mean they should be promoted in elementary school. I'm completely against mutilating a child's body to forward an agenda. Children continually change and grow. That's natural. To disfigure them based on a whim that they momentarily think will last forever is unforgivable abuse. Those doing it need to be prosecuted for child abuse. Naked men with breast implants running around on the open streets, particularly around children, GayPride or not, is not legal

Sexual orientation and gender identity should be protected classes in non-discrimination laws.

Neutral

They already are protected. That doesn't mean they should be promoted in elementary school. I'm completely against mutilating a child's body to forward an agenda. Children continually change and grow. That's natural. To disfigure them based on a whim that they momentarily think will last forever is unforgivable abuse. Those doing it need to be prosecuted for child abuse. Naked men with breast implants running around on the open streets, particularly around children, GayPride or not, is not legal

Sexual orientation and gender identity should be protected classes in non-discrimination laws.

Neutral

They already are protected. That doesn't mean they should be promoted in elementary school. I'm completely against mutilating a child's body to forward an agenda. Children continually change and grow. That's natural. To disfigure them based on a whim that they momentarily think will last forever is unforgivable abuse. Those doing it need to be prosecuted for child abuse. Naked men with breast implants running around on the open streets, particularly around children, GayPride or not, is not legal

Sexual orientation and gender identity should be protected classes in non-discrimination laws.

Neutral

They already are protected. That doesn't mean they should be promoted in elementary school. I'm completely against mutilating a child's body to forward an agenda. Children continually change and grow. That's natural. To disfigure them based on a whim that they momentarily think will last forever is unforgivable abuse. Those doing it need to be prosecuted for child abuse. Naked men with breast implants running around on the open streets, particularly around children, GayPride or not, is not legal

I agree with Critical Race Theory (CRT) which asserts that the institutions in the United States are fundamentally racist.

Strongly Disagree

CRT has no place in the classroom. I campaign in person and have spoken to a multitude of people from all different backgrounds. No one wants this. Blacks and hispanics are just as concerned about CRT as whites. CRT is fundamentally racists. All people matter. Teaching hate is not a solution. CRT teaches hatred and racism toward whites. That's not a viable solution.

I agree with Critical Race Theory (CRT) which asserts that the institutions in the United States are fundamentally racist.

Strongly Disagree

CRT has no place in the classroom. I campaign in person and have spoken to a multitude of people from all different backgrounds. No one wants this. Blacks and hispanics are just as concerned about CRT as whites. CRT is fundamentally racists. All people matter. Teaching hate is not a solution. CRT teaches hatred and racism toward whites. That's not a viable solution.

I agree with Critical Race Theory (CRT) which asserts that the institutions in the United States are fundamentally racist.

Strongly Disagree

CRT has no place in the classroom. I campaign in person and have spoken to a multitude of people from all different backgrounds. No one wants this. Blacks and hispanics are just as concerned about CRT as whites. CRT is fundamentally racists. All people matter. Teaching hate is not a solution. CRT teaches hatred and racism toward whites. That's not a viable solution.

I agree with Critical Race Theory (CRT) which asserts that the institutions in the United States are fundamentally racist.

Strongly Disagree

CRT has no place in the classroom. I campaign in person and have spoken to a multitude of people from all different backgrounds. No one wants this. Blacks and hispanics are just as concerned about CRT as whites. CRT is fundamentally racists. All people matter. Teaching hate is not a solution. CRT teaches hatred and racism toward whites. That's not a viable solution.

Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.

I was baptized a Lutheran. I tend to be more spiritual than religious. I do believe we are in a fight - good v evil. It appears to be a global fight. It has nothing to do with party. There are good people in both parties and as independents.

Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.

I was baptized a Lutheran. I tend to be more spiritual than religious. I do believe we are in a fight - good v evil. It appears to be a global fight. It has nothing to do with party. There are good people in both parties and as independents.

Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.

I was baptized a Lutheran. I tend to be more spiritual than religious. I do believe we are in a fight - good v evil. It appears to be a global fight. It has nothing to do with party. There are good people in both parties and as independents.

Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.

I was baptized a Lutheran. I tend to be more spiritual than religious. I do believe we are in a fight - good v evil. It appears to be a global fight. It has nothing to do with party. There are good people in both parties and as independents.


ELECTIONS AND VOTING

People should be able to vote without photo identification.

Strongly Disagree

You need to be an American citizen to vote in the United States of America. PERIOD!!! I can't vote in China or Guatamala, just like they can't vote here. If Dems are that desperate for new votes, then there is clearly a fundamental problem...and it is not that we aren't letting illegals and non-citizens vote in our elections. U.S. politicians only represent Americans citizens. It's really a very simple concept.

People should be able to vote without photo identification.

Strongly Disagree

You need to be an American citizen to vote in the United States of America. PERIOD!!! I can't vote in China or Guatamala, just like they can't vote here. If Dems are that desperate for new votes, then there is clearly a fundamental problem...and it is not that we aren't letting illegals and non-citizens vote in our elections. U.S. politicians only represent Americans citizens. It's really a very simple concept.

People should be able to vote without photo identification.

Strongly Disagree

You need to be an American citizen to vote in the United States of America. PERIOD!!! I can't vote in China or Guatamala, just like they can't vote here. If Dems are that desperate for new votes, then there is clearly a fundamental problem...and it is not that we aren't letting illegals and non-citizens vote in our elections. U.S. politicians only represent Americans citizens. It's really a very simple concept.

People should be able to vote without photo identification.

Strongly Disagree

You need to be an American citizen to vote in the United States of America. PERIOD!!! I can't vote in China or Guatamala, just like they can't vote here. If Dems are that desperate for new votes, then there is clearly a fundamental problem...and it is not that we aren't letting illegals and non-citizens vote in our elections. U.S. politicians only represent Americans citizens. It's really a very simple concept.

What laws would you propose to change present voting practices?

One day voting on a national holiday. In person voting only. No voting by mail, with exception of overseas. Watermarked ballots. Counting at precinct level, same day as election. Total called in, emailed and hand-delivered directly after ballots totally counted. Counting does not stop until all ballots have been counted. This should not take more than a couple hours after votings ends. ID must be shown to vote (picture ID). No tech needed for elections. No wifi. No Dominion. No ES&S. Etc. We voted manually for more than 100 years. We're fully capable of doing it.

What laws would you propose to change present voting practices?

One day voting on a national holiday. In person voting only. No voting by mail, with exception of overseas. Watermarked ballots. Counting at precinct level, same day as election. Total called in, emailed and hand-delivered directly after ballots totally counted. Counting does not stop until all ballots have been counted. This should not take more than a couple hours after votings ends. ID must be shown to vote (picture ID). No tech needed for elections. No wifi. No Dominion. No ES&S. Etc. We voted manually for more than 100 years. We're fully capable of doing it.

What laws would you propose to change present voting practices?

One day voting on a national holiday. In person voting only. No voting by mail, with exception of overseas. Watermarked ballots. Counting at precinct level, same day as election. Total called in, emailed and hand-delivered directly after ballots totally counted. Counting does not stop until all ballots have been counted. This should not take more than a couple hours after votings ends. ID must be shown to vote (picture ID). No tech needed for elections. No wifi. No Dominion. No ES&S. Etc. We voted manually for more than 100 years. We're fully capable of doing it.

What laws would you propose to change present voting practices?

One day voting on a national holiday. In person voting only. No voting by mail, with exception of overseas. Watermarked ballots. Counting at precinct level, same day as election. Total called in, emailed and hand-delivered directly after ballots totally counted. Counting does not stop until all ballots have been counted. This should not take more than a couple hours after votings ends. ID must be shown to vote (picture ID). No tech needed for elections. No wifi. No Dominion. No ES&S. Etc. We voted manually for more than 100 years. We're fully capable of doing it.


EQUALITY

Reparations should be given to people on the basis of race.

Strongly Disagree

Black men had the vote 50 years before any woman. My mother couldn't get a loan for a home in the 1970s because she was a woman, yet it was she who was eligible for the loan. My father's business was new. The bank made my father's parents co-sign the loan. Where are the reparations for women? Don't white women's lives matter? Why would you only give non-whites reparations? Didn't blacks sell blacks to whites in Africa? Only 1.6% of whites owned slaves. 400K whites died freeing the slaves.

Reparations should be given to people on the basis of race.

Strongly Disagree

Black men had the vote 50 years before any woman. My mother couldn't get a loan for a home in the 1970s because she was a woman, yet it was she who was eligible for the loan. My father's business was new. The bank made my father's parents co-sign the loan. Where are the reparations for women? Don't white women's lives matter? Why would you only give non-whites reparations? Didn't blacks sell blacks to whites in Africa? Only 1.6% of whites owned slaves. 400K whites died freeing the slaves.

Reparations should be given to people on the basis of race.

Strongly Disagree

Black men had the vote 50 years before any woman. My mother couldn't get a loan for a home in the 1970s because she was a woman, yet it was she who was eligible for the loan. My father's business was new. The bank made my father's parents co-sign the loan. Where are the reparations for women? Don't white women's lives matter? Why would you only give non-whites reparations? Didn't blacks sell blacks to whites in Africa? Only 1.6% of whites owned slaves. 400K whites died freeing the slaves.

Reparations should be given to people on the basis of race.

Strongly Disagree

Black men had the vote 50 years before any woman. My mother couldn't get a loan for a home in the 1970s because she was a woman, yet it was she who was eligible for the loan. My father's business was new. The bank made my father's parents co-sign the loan. Where are the reparations for women? Don't white women's lives matter? Why would you only give non-whites reparations? Didn't blacks sell blacks to whites in Africa? Only 1.6% of whites owned slaves. 400K whites died freeing the slaves.

Is racism a threat to domestic security in the United States? Why or why not?

No. MSM intentionally creates a divide between the races to keep us all weak and fighting. All people are equal. United we stand. Divided we fall.

Is racism a threat to domestic security in the United States? Why or why not?

No. MSM intentionally creates a divide between the races to keep us all weak and fighting. All people are equal. United we stand. Divided we fall.

Is racism a threat to domestic security in the United States? Why or why not?

No. MSM intentionally creates a divide between the races to keep us all weak and fighting. All people are equal. United we stand. Divided we fall.

Is racism a threat to domestic security in the United States? Why or why not?

No. MSM intentionally creates a divide between the races to keep us all weak and fighting. All people are equal. United we stand. Divided we fall.


ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT

I support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources.

Neutral

I support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources.

Neutral

I support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources.

Neutral

I support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources.

Neutral

Which comes closest to your view? A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. B) Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost.

Did not answer

Which comes closest to your view? A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. B) Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost.

Did not answer

Which comes closest to your view? A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. B) Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost.

Did not answer

Which comes closest to your view? A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. B) Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost.

Did not answer


ABOUT YOU

When you consider your views on a wide range of issues from economic and social matters to foreign policy and religious liberty, which of the following best describes you overall?

Moderate

When you consider your views on a wide range of issues from economic and social matters to foreign policy and religious liberty, which of the following best describes you overall?

Moderate

When you consider your views on a wide range of issues from economic and social matters to foreign policy and religious liberty, which of the following best describes you overall?

Moderate

When you consider your views on a wide range of issues from economic and social matters to foreign policy and religious liberty, which of the following best describes you overall?

Moderate

Please provide publicly available information, including interviews and media reports, validating your answer to the previous question (other than your website).

Did not answer

Please provide publicly available information, including interviews and media reports, validating your answer to the previous question (other than your website).

Did not answer

Please provide publicly available information, including interviews and media reports, validating your answer to the previous question (other than your website).

Did not answer

Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized in either civil or criminal court for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.

No.

Please provide publicly available information, including interviews and media reports, validating your answer to the previous question (other than your website).

Did not answer

Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized in either civil or criminal court for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.

No.

What else would you like voters to know about you, including your legislative priorities?

I'm not a career politician. We need citizen representation, not politicians who will vote any which way to stay in office... or to appease corporations. I only care about straightening out the problems our country faces. As a No Party Affiliate, neither party can pressure me, only the People. You vote me in. You vote me out. I only work for the People, as it should be! Our country is in crisis. It's not a party issue. It's a We the People issue. We can only fix this if we have representatives in Congress who actually care about us and represent us. I will do that. I'd like to fix the problems and get out. We CAN fix the problems. It's NOT too late. It will take strength, perserverance and determination to get our country back on track. I can and will do that! You are worth it! Our country is worth it!

Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized in either civil or criminal court for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.

No.

Have you ever been convicted of a felony or been penalized in either civil or criminal court for sexual misconduct? If so, please explain.

No.

What else would you like voters to know about you, including your legislative priorities?

I'm not a career politician. We need citizen representation, not politicians who will vote any which way to stay in office... or to appease corporations. I only care about straightening out the problems our country faces. As a No Party Affiliate, neither party can pressure me, only the People. You vote me in. You vote me out. I only work for the People, as it should be! Our country is in crisis. It's not a party issue. It's a We the People issue. We can only fix this if we have representatives in Congress who actually care about us and represent us. I will do that. I'd like to fix the problems and get out. We CAN fix the problems. It's NOT too late. It will take strength, perserverance and determination to get our country back on track. I can and will do that! You are worth it! Our country is worth it!

What else would you like voters to know about you, including your legislative priorities?

I'm not a career politician. We need citizen representation, not politicians who will vote any which way to stay in office... or to appease corporations. I only care about straightening out the problems our country faces. As a No Party Affiliate, neither party can pressure me, only the People. You vote me in. You vote me out. I only work for the People, as it should be! Our country is in crisis. It's not a party issue. It's a We the People issue. We can only fix this if we have representatives in Congress who actually care about us and represent us. I will do that. I'd like to fix the problems and get out. We CAN fix the problems. It's NOT too late. It will take strength, perserverance and determination to get our country back on track. I can and will do that! You are worth it! Our country is worth it!

What else would you like voters to know about you, including your legislative priorities?

I'm not a career politician. We need citizen representation, not politicians who will vote any which way to stay in office... or to appease corporations. I only care about straightening out the problems our country faces. As a No Party Affiliate, neither party can pressure me, only the People. You vote me in. You vote me out. I only work for the People, as it should be! Our country is in crisis. It's not a party issue. It's a We the People issue. We can only fix this if we have representatives in Congress who actually care about us and represent us. I will do that. I'd like to fix the problems and get out. We CAN fix the problems. It's NOT too late. It will take strength, perserverance and determination to get our country back on track. I can and will do that! You are worth it! Our country is worth it!


CRIMINAL JUSTICE & PUBLIC SAFETY

Police officers should be personally immune from prosecution for conduct consistent with departmental policy (qualified immunity) while on duty.

Neutral

Police officers are 'personally immune' unless they violate a statute (break the law), in which case that particular officer loses their immunity. If a 'departmental policy' differs from the law, then that department better align their policies to abide by the law because they are NOT immune from following the laws of this country and their state.

Police officers should be personally immune from prosecution for conduct consistent with departmental policy (qualified immunity) while on duty.

Neutral

Police officers are 'personally immune' unless they violate a statute (break the law), in which case that particular officer loses their immunity. If a 'departmental policy' differs from the law, then that department better align their policies to abide by the law because they are NOT immune from following the laws of this country and their state.

I support redirecting funds from police departments to mental health and community programs.

Disagree

Police officers should be personally immune from prosecution for conduct consistent with departmental policy (qualified immunity) while on duty.

Neutral

Police officers are 'personally immune' unless they violate a statute (break the law), in which case that particular officer loses their immunity. If a 'departmental policy' differs from the law, then that department better align their policies to abide by the law because they are NOT immune from following the laws of this country and their state.

Police officers should be personally immune from prosecution for conduct consistent with departmental policy (qualified immunity) while on duty.

Neutral

Police officers are 'personally immune' unless they violate a statute (break the law), in which case that particular officer loses their immunity. If a 'departmental policy' differs from the law, then that department better align their policies to abide by the law because they are NOT immune from following the laws of this country and their state.

I support redirecting funds from police departments to mental health and community programs.

Disagree

I support redirecting funds from police departments to mental health and community programs.

Disagree

I support redirecting funds from police departments to mental health and community programs.

Disagree


2ND AMENDMENT

What restrictions on gun ownership are needed to protect public safety?

Did not answer

What restrictions on gun ownership are needed to protect public safety?

Did not answer

Victims of gun violence should be able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers.

Disagree

What restrictions on gun ownership are needed to protect public safety?

Did not answer

Victims of gun violence should be able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers.

Disagree

What restrictions on gun ownership are needed to protect public safety?

Did not answer

Victims of gun violence should be able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers.

Disagree

Victims of gun violence should be able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers.

Disagree

If you are not already receiving our emails, stay up to date with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.

I agree to receive text messages at the phone number provided.