

Jenifer Branning
Non-Partisan | Mississippi
Candidate Profile
Originalist (Conditional)
BIOGRAPHY
Name
Jenifer Branning
Party
Non-Partisan
Election Year
2024
Election
General
Race
Supreme Court, Dist. 1, Place 3
Incumbent
No
EDUCATION
Candidate did not provide
WORK & MILITARY
Candidate did not provide
AFFILIATIONS
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES HELD
Candidate did not provide
POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT
Candidate did not provide
Race
Previous Races
SCORECARDS
CONSERVATIVE ORGANIZATIONS
2022
A
2020-2021
100%
2023
59%, 57% (cum.)†
2023
53%
2024
51%
2020-2021
|100%
2023
|59%, 57% (cum.)†
2023
|53%
2024
|51%
LIBERAL ORGANIZATIONS
SELECTED CONTRIBUTIONS
CONSERVATIVE
GIVEN BY CANDIDATE (2)
Tate Reeves (2023)
Tyler McCaughn (2021)
RECEIVED BY CANDIDATE (2)
Idaho Forest Group (2022)
Rural Property Rights Association of Mississippi (2021)
OTHER INFORMATION
From homepage of Jenifer Branning's campaign website:
- Described herself as a “A Proven, Constitutional Conservative”
- “Believes that Supreme Court justices should properly interpret the law—not legislate from the bench.”
- “Has written legislation to cut red tape on farmers, manufacturers and other businesses in Mississippi.”
From Tan, Avianne. "Mississippi's 'Religious Freedom' Bill: What to Know About the New 'Sweeping Anti-LGBT Law'." ABC News, 6 Apr. 2016.
- Sen. Branning said, that House Bill 1523 (2016) “gives protection to those in the state who cannot in a good conscience provide services for a same-sex marriage[.]"
- Sen. Branning said, "I don’t think this bill is discriminatory. It takes no rights away."
- The bill “protect[s] people's right to ‘religious freedom’ from ‘government discrimination[.]’”
Jenifer Branning posted to Facebook, "Don’t my boys look sharp on the Lord’s Day?"
Jenifer Branning posted to Facebook, "We need members of our Mississippi Supreme Court who will uphold the law, not rewrite it or bend the rules for anybody. As a Constitutional conservative, I'll always uphold the rule of law on the Supreme Court. I want to earn your vote[.]"
Jenifer Branning posted to Facebook, "Supreme Court Justices should properly interpret the law—not legislate from the bench. We have all seen what happens when activist judges try to change our laws—and that’s wrong. As a Constitutional conservative, I will always uphold the rule of law. I'm Jenifer Branning, and I'm running for Mississippi Supreme Court. Please learn more about our campaign today!"
Jenifer Branning posted to Facebook, "Today we should all be thankful for the great work and professionalism of local law enforcement, the United States Secret Service and other state and federal agencies for the job they do each and every day to protect not just candidates for public office, but all citizens. They play a critical role in not only protecting the public, but insuring that we have free and fair elections by providing a safe environment for political debate. As tragic as the events of today have been, it would have been much worse without the incredible response and bravery of our men and women in law enforcement. My thoughts and prayers are with the victims, their families and former President Trump. We should be praying for our nation like never before!"
Jenifer Branning posted to Facebook, "It was an honor to co-author the Support Israel Act of 2024, which provides much needed support to Israel! Thank you to both House and Senate leadership, as well as Gov. Reeves for leading the charge on this vitally important issue. 'Redeem Israel, O God, out of all his troubles.' Psalm 25:22"
The Support Israel Act of 2024 (H.R.8369) "bill specifies that no federal funds may be used to withhold, halt, reverse, or cancel the delivery of defense articles or defense services to Israel."
From "Bio." Jenifer Branning for Supreme Court.
- "Jenifer and her husband, Chancy, place top priority on faith and family life and are very active in their church and community. The election for Mississippi Supreme Court will be held on November 5."
“Mississippi Republican Party Endorses State Senator Jenifer Branning for Mississippi Supreme Court.” Jenifer Branning for Supreme Court*, 13 Aug. 2024.
- '"We Mississippians need proven conservative leaders serving on our highest court,' said Mississippi Republican Party Chairman Mike Hurst. 'It’s vital that we have Justices who will uphold the Constitution and interpret our state’s laws as written, and not legislate from the bench. Senator Branning has been a conservative champion in the Legislature and is well-prepared to lead with integrity and defend our Constitution on day one. The Mississippi Republican Party is proud to endorse Jenifer Branning for Justice of the Mississippi Supreme Court.'"
QUESTIONNAIRE
RIGHT TO LIFE
Was Dobbs v. Jackson rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain.
Did not answer
I support a right to accelerate ending a human life.
Did not answer
Human life deserves legal protection from conception until natural death.
Did not answer
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY
Religious liberty is at risk in the United States.
Did not answer
VALUES
Briefly describe your spiritual beliefs and values.
Did not answer
What is your view of parental rights regarding the upbringing of children, specifically education and sexual "identity"?
Did not answer
I support "gender identity" as a specially protected class. Please explain.
Did not answer
What do you believe to be true about the human condition?
Did not answer
EQUALITY
I agree with Critical Race Theory (CRT).
Did not answer
ABOUT YOU
What, if any, church or organizations do you belong to?
Did not answer
I voted in these primaries and general elections:
Did not answer
Have you ever been convicted of a felony? If so, please explain.
Did not answer
Have you ever been penalized for sexual misconduct in either civil or criminal court? If so, please explain.
Did not answer
Would you describe your judicial philosophy as originalist, living constitutionalist, or something else? Please explain.
Did not answer
JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY
Which current or past U.S. Supreme Court justice best reflects your judicial philosophy?
Did not answer
Is there a separation of church and state in the Constitution? Please explain.
Did not answer
Should courts address threats to religious liberty in the United States? If so, how?
Did not answer
Was Obergefell v. Hodges rightly decided according to the text of the Constitution? Please explain.
Did not answer
Was Bostock v. Clayton County rightly decided under the law? Please explain.
Did not answer
I agree that “the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder.” (Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57, 65-66 (2000); quoting Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 (1944).
Did not answer
What should a judge do when legislative texts and court precedents dictate different results?
Did not answer
When should a judge overturn past court decisions?
Did not answer
When, if ever, should a judge take popular opinion or the social views of the majority into consideration?
Did not answer
Do you believe the meaning of the Constitution changes over time, absent changes through the amendment process of Article V?
Did not answer
What do you believe is the single most important quality a judge should possess?
Did not answer
If you are an incumbent judge, describe a recent instance in which you acted to preserve your judicial independence. If you are an aspiring judge, how do you plan to remain independent if elected to the bench?
Did not answer
2ND AMENDMENT
The right to bear arms is fundamental and must be protected.
Did not answer
OTHER IMPORTANT ISSUES
Which branch of government do you believe was intended to wield the most authority?
Did not answer
How should the court address public health and individual freedoms in the time of a public health emergency?
Did not answer
If you are not already receiving our emails, stay up to date with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.
Invest in America’s Future
Join the movement to restore biblical values and constitutional principles in our nation by informing and mobilizing more faith-based voters with the truth.