Sean Haugh

Any. Abortion is a personal healthcare matter that should remain completely between a patient and their providers. Government should stay out of this issue entirely.

Neutral

Ideally, I would like to get government out of healthcare. However, wherever there is government funding of healthcare, Planned Parenthood and similar providers should be treated the same as any other recipient.

I oppose any law that restricts access to abortion.

Agree

This is also an issue that should remain between people and their healthcare providers, without any government involvement whatsoever.

No

All people have the right to choose their own healthcare options. Government should not mandate or limit this fundamental human right.

Agree

We need to end all inflationary policies, which are a silent transfer of wealth from poor to rich. We must end all corporate welfare, starting with the $1billion in incentives in the current state budget. Let's also repeal all laws and regulations that protect corporations' profits, market share, or liability for any harm caused. Repeal occupational licensing, small business taxes, and any other laws that limit people from seeking better employment.

It should be eliminated.

Strongly Disagree

Disagree

All relationships, including commercial ones, should be mutually voluntary.

None whatsoever.

I am for total separation of church and state. Churches, religion, or spiritual practices of any kind should not be regulated by the state.

D) Tax-payer funded health care should be abolished in all forms, and Medicaid and Medicare should be de-funded.

Only in private circumstances. Schools and businesses should be free to set their own vaccination policies. Government should never be granted the power to require vaccinations.

Agree

Where government does continue to fund education, the funds should follow students, not systems. I am in favor of any program that give parents more choices in education.

None. There should be no limitations on parents' involvement in their children's education.

All citizens have the right to be heard by public officials in open meetings. There should be no restrictions beyond the usual time limitations for anyone addressing the board.

Disagree

While there are certainly many moral values from Judeo-Christian traditions that are instructive, our system of limited government is rooted in the right of all peaceful people to live their lives as they see fit, as long as they aren't taking away that right from others.

Neutral

I would prefer to abolish the growing laundry list of nondiscrimination laws in favor of a legal paradigm that firmly establishes the right of everyone to live their lives as they see fit without government defining it for them. But if we are going to continue down the current path, yes I do think gender identity should be protected like anything else already on the list.

Neutral

"Critical Race Theory" is a nonsense term, a completely made-up moral panic. We absolutely must have open and honest conversations about race in America. This ain't it.

Your life belongs to you and no one else. It is up to you what you want to do with it, and you should have the freedom to pursue your own ambitions. I've personally found that being honest, kind, and grateful to people helps make it much easier.

Strongly Agree

We always had sufficient ways to verify a voter's eligibility before this nonsense issue arose.

There are several reforms we could implement to increase access to voting. I support automatic voter registration at age 18, just to cite one example. Also, eliminate ballot access restrictions so all citizens have an opportunity to run for office and vote for the candidates of their choice. I support the recently filed lawsuit that aims to open up eligibility to serve on the state and county Boards of Elections to all voters, not just Democrats and Republicans. I could take up the whole 5000 characters and more on this topic, so let me just say I am in favor of any and all changes in our laws that increase the ability of voters to participate in all parts of the electoral process, starting with unhindered access to the right to vote.

Yes. We need to end all government policies that institutionalize and promote racism and all other forms of bigotry. One prime example is abolishing the legal doctrine of Qualified Immunity, so that police and government officials can be held liable for violations of people's life and liberty. At the federal level, we must end our support for perpetual war, which is racist mass murder on a mass scale. Government can't regulate the racism out of people, but it can do so much to set a better example. To a large degree it is up to us to stop voting for politicians who aim to divide us against each other while persecuting minorities. The racism that rises to the level of being a true threat to domestic security comes from government policies and the mouths of politicians.

Environmental laws and regulations should be completely rewritten, to focus on fully compensating anyone who is harmed in their person or property by pollution. The current regulatory model protects major corporate and government agency polluters by limiting or even eliminating liability for the consequences of their actions. We can do a better job of regulating away environmental harms by demanding that those harmed by pollution by fully compensated for their losses, including criminal charges as appropriate when people are physically harmed.

Above all, to protect the rights of the people. In our current economic system, I do believe there is a role for government to undertake those projects that are socially necessary but inherently unprofitable. Things like a system of justice, national defense, housing for those who can't work, matters necessary to public health. Ideally, at some point in human advancement we will no longer need government, but until then we must keep it as limited as possible.

Choose not to answer

I am totally unconcerned with what is considered liberal or conservative. The best description of my political views is I will always side with individual liberty against government authority.

haha anyone is welcome to google me

No.

I am asking to be your public servant, and I take that very seriously. I am always open to hearing from the people in my district about how I can best serve them and fight for what they need to survive and thrive. I believe I have some great solutions, but my public policy ideas must always be tested and informed by what actually works for people in real life.

Strongly Disagree

Police and government officials, above all others because of the public trust we have placed in them, must be held liable for violations of people's Constitutional rights.

Neutral

I support redirecting funds for law enforcement back to the taxpayers. Just simply ending the War on Drugs we can liberate a lot of government resources devoted to policing and criminal justice. That being said, I do support local governments using mental health professionals and other more peaceful responders for calls that do not require police.

Banning stuff simply does not work. It didn't work with alcohol, or drugs, or abortion, and it certainly won't work with guns. The 3D printer has made any restrictions on gun ownership obsolete. We have to find other ways to increase peace in our society. We have to do the hard work of getting murder out of our hearts. That starts with ending killing as government policy.

Strongly Disagree

Victims of violence should be able to sue the people who committed the act of violence.

No

This anti-trans hysteria is shameful and I am having none of it. Transgendered people should be able to participate in society just like everyone else. Trans kids exist, get used to accepting them as human beings with rights just like everybody else. I am strongly opposed to any public policy that legislates gender identity.