Amendment 86

BALLOT LANGUAGE

Shall there be an amendment to the Colorado Constitution concerning congressional redistricting, and, in connection therewith, reenacting the current process for congressional redistricting in the Colorado Constitution and prohibiting modifications to a final map unless at least three public meetings are held, the modifications do not have the effect of dividing communities of interest or purposefully favoring one political party, and are approved by the congressional redistricting commission and the Colorado Supreme Court?

WHAT IT MEANS

Yes

A “Yes” vote would amend the Colorado Constitution to apply the current congressional redistricting process to mid-cycle redistricting. In Colorado, congressional redistricting is carried out by the independent congressional redistricting commission and approved by the Colorado Supreme Court.

No

A “No” vote would keep the current language of the Colorado Constitution which establishes the process for congressional redistricting but would not apply the same process to mid-cycle redistricting. In Colorado, congressional redistricting is carried out by the independent congressional redistricting commission and approved by the Colorado Supreme Court.

ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST

Yes

“Initiative 256 puts exactly what Colorado voters want in the state constitution — a prohibition on any mid-cycle maps from being drawn to benefit a specific political party. Instead, voters want independent maps that prioritize their communities.” - Kristi Burton Brown, Executive Vice President, Advance Colorado 

No

“Colorado already has an independent congressional redistricting process designed to prevent partisan gerrymandering. Amendment 86 would add new and potentially conflicting constitutional standards governing off-cycle redistricting, including different tests for whether a map has the “effect” or “purpose” of favoring a political party and ambiguous language about dividing communities of interest. These provisions could invite litigation without making Colorado’s maps fairer. Our Constitution already provides strong protections against partisan gerrymandering; we should not rewrite those rules without a demonstrated problem that needs to be fixed.” - Eagle County Democrats   

ENDORSEMENTS

Yes

Independence Institute (Conservative)

Advance Colorado (Conservative)

Brighter Colorado (Other)

Fair Redistricting Colorado (Other)

American Revival PAC (Conservative)

No

Boulder Progressives (Liberal)

League of Women Voters of Colorado (Liberal)

Colorado Democratic Party (Liberal)

ProgressNow Colorado (Liberal)

Eagle County Democrats (Liberal)

FINANCIAL BACKING

The following information provides insight into the money being spent to pass or defeat the ballot measure.

Yes

This question is on the ballot in Colorado as an initiated constitutional amendment on November 3, 2026. As of September 18, 2026, the committees formed to support Colorado Amendment 86, Require Commission and Supreme Court Approval for Mid-Decade Congressional Redistricting Initiative (2026) are:

FAIR REDISTRICTING COLORADO

Selected contributions to: "Fair Redistricting Colorado" include:

  • American Revival PAC
  • Advance Colorado

BRIGHTER COLORADO

Selected contributions to: "Brighter Colorado" include:

  • Common Sense America
  • Advance Colorado
  • Richard McCormick

No

This question is on the ballot in Colorado as an initiated constitutional amendment on November 3, 2026. As of September 18, 2026, no committee to oppose the amendment has been identified. Thus, there is no record of funds raised to oppose the amendment.

OTHER INFORMATION

If you are not already receiving our updates, stay current with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.

I agree to receive text messages at the mobile number provided.