Question 9 - Referendum on an Existing Law

Ballot Icon Ballot Measure

PASSED

Result Icon Result

LIBERAL

BALLOT LANGUAGE

Do you approve of a law summarized below, which was approved by the House of Representatives on July 18, 2024 by a vote of 124 to 33, and approved by the Senate on July 18, 2024 by a vote of 35 to 5? 

This law makes a number of changes to Massachusetts laws governing firearms. 

The law adds school administrators and licensed healthcare providers as parties permitted to ask a court to issue an Extreme Risk Protection Order – requiring an individual to surrender or relinquish their firearm licenses, permits, and firearms - if an individual is a present danger to self or others. The law also provides that, when issuing an Harassment Prevention Order, a court may also order the surrender of firearms licenses, permits, and firearms. 

The law imposes penalties for possessing, creating, and transferring untraceable “ghost gun” firearms and requires all firearms except antiques and relics, including unfinished frames and receivers that can be readily made into a finished product, to have serial numbers. The law includes privately-made guns like 3D-printed guns within the provisions governing untraceable “ghost gun” firearms. 

The law changes firearms licensing requirements to: (1) allow local licensing authorities to request prior license and permit information from the state, as well as access petitions for involuntary mental health commitments denied by a court in addition to prior involuntary commitments, as a part of their review of applications for licenses to carry firearms, firearm ID cards, and licenses to sell firearms; (2) require an individual to be 21 years of age to own semiautomatic rifles or shotguns; (3) add the possibility of incarceration of up to six months for a second offense of failing to report a firearm loss or theft; and (4) enable 12-15 year olds to apply for a self-defense spray permit with parental permission, and 15 to 18 year olds to apply independently. 

The law allows local firearm licensing authorities to transfer the responsibility to inspect firearm dealers to the State Police. The law requires local licensing authorities to attend statewide training regarding those inspections. It requires dealers to confiscate expired or suspended licenses and report them to the state and to local licensing authorities. 

The law changes the definition of “machine gun” to include bump stocks, trigger cranks, Glock switches and auto sears among the devices whose possession and use are subject to penalties. It expands the definition of “silencer” to include the parts used to construct a silencer. 

The law clarifies how to determine whether a firearm is an assault-style weapon and the circumstances under which a person may continue to possess assault-style weapons and large capacity feeding devices they already own. 

The law requires the state Firearm Control Advisory Board and the state Secretary of Public Safety and Security to review and update the rosters of prohibited assault-style firearms, approved firearms, and approved firearms sold for target shooting. 

The law clarifies requirements relating to the carry and transport of firearms in motor vehicles and ATVs. It prohibits the carrying of firearms in government buildings, polling locations, and schools, with certain exceptions. 

The law expands data compilation and reporting requirements to and from the state, and creates a publicly-accessible dashboard of anonymized aggregate firearm data, along with a commission to study that data. 

The law requires the State Police to provide training and a test for new applicants for licenses to carry or Firearm ID cards. 

The law establishes two special legislative commissions – one to examine funding for violence prevention services, and one to study emerging firearms technology. 

The law criminalizes discharging a firearm and striking a building in use. 

A YES VOTE would keep in place the law, which increases the regulation of firearms, including ghost guns, machine guns, and assault-style weapons. 

A NO VOTE would repeal this law. 

WHAT IT MEANS

Yes

A “Yes” vote would keep the current Massachusetts Statute which expands firearms regulations.

No

A “No” vote would repeal the current Massachusetts Statute which expands firearms regulations. 

ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST

Yes

"On November 3rd, vote YES on question 9 to protect Massachusetts’ strong gun laws — so we can build a Commonwealth where every community is free from gun violence. 

In 2024, Massachusetts passed its strongest gun safety law in a decade, cracking down on ghost guns and modernizing safety regulations. Now the gun lobby wants to overturn this updated law with a repeal referendum on the November 2026 ballot.

Vote Yes for a Safe Massachusetts is building a powerful state-wide response to protect this law on the 2026 ballot and keep our communities safe. Join us to defend progress and save lives from gun violence.

Gun violence is preventable — and Massachusetts is leading the way. We have one of the lowest gun death rates in the country because we’ve taken action with an effective combination of strong gun safety laws, community-led solutions, and evidence-based research. The law our extremist opponents are seeking to repeal combines all of these proven approaches — giving us a vital, updated set of tools to prevent gun violence in all its forms. Because of this law, the GIFFORDS Gun Law Scorecard has given Massachusetts an A grade two years in a row!

Vote Yes for a Safe Massachusetts is ready to defend this lifesaving law and ensure that Massachusetts has every possible resource to build a Commonwealth that is safe for everyone." - Yes for a Safe Massachusetts

No

"In 2024, Chapter 135 (formerly H.4885) was signed into law with sweeping mandates that turn law-abiding citizens into criminals overnight and force honest citizens to reapply for rights they’ve held for decades to comply with confusing, burdensome rules that violate due process and privacy.

The Civil Rights Coalition is working to repeal Chapter 135, citing the dangerous precedents it sets which have the potential to reach far beyond the Second Amendment and threaten all Civil Rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution.

The law requires registration of all lawfully owned firearms, creating a centralized database of lawful gun owners in Massachusetts. This sets a dangerous precedent for the Government to be collecting this data and raises concerns about the privacy and security of firearm owners’ personal information.

The broadly expanded list of petitioners who may file for an ERPO now included individuals with no Medical or Mental Health Training. This has significant potential for abuse and misuse of the provision, with individuals using ERPOs for personal grievances or as tools of harassment. 

Immediate confiscation of firearms without an initial hearing may infringe on due process rights, leaving individuals with limited recourse. Being subject to an ERPO can damage an individual’s reputation, even if the claims are later found to be unfounded.

Determining compliance with the nuanced definitions throughout this law may be difficult, leading to inconsistent enforcement." - The Civil Rights Coalition

ENDORSEMENTS

Yes

Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence (Liberal)

Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund (Liberal)

Giffords PAC (Liberal)

Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America (Liberal)

SEIU Local 32BJ Service Employees International Union (Liberal)

No

Gun Owners Action League (Conservative)

American Family Association (Conservative)

Massachusetts Republican Party (Conservative)

Massachusetts Trappers Association (Other)

Massachusetts Conservation Alliance (Conservative)

FINANCIAL BACKING

The following information provides insight into the money being spent to pass or defeat the ballot measure.

Yes

MASSACHUSETTS QUESTION 9, FIREARM REGULATIONS REFERENDUM (2026)

This question is on the ballot in Massachusetts as a veto referendum on November 3, 2026. As of October 6, 2026, the committees formed to support Massachusetts Question 9, Firearm Regulations Referendum (2026) are:

YES FOR A SAFE MASSACHUSETTS

Selected contributions to: "Yes for a Safe Massachusetts" include:

  • Massachusetts Teachers Association
  • Alliance for Gun Responsibility
  • Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund
  • SEIU
  • Nigel Travis
  • Molly Malloy
  • Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action
  • Janet Goldenberg
  • Massachusetts Coalition to Prevent Gun Violence
  • AFT Massachusetts - AFL-CIO

DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS FOR A FAIR MASSACHUSETTS

Selected contributions to: "Democratic Socialists for a Fair Massachusetts" include:

  • James Del Bonis

No

MASSACHUSETTS QUESTION 9, FIREARM REGULATIONS REFERENDUM (2026)

This question is on the ballot in Massachusetts as a veto referendum on November 3, 2026. As of October 6, 2026, the committees formed to oppose Massachusetts Question 9, Firearm Regulations Referendum (2026) are:

THE CIVIL RIGHTS COALITION

Selected contributions to: "The Civil Rights Coalition" include:

  • Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.
  • Gun Owners Action League
  • Old Colony Sportsmen's Association, Inc.
  • EcoGeek, Inc.
  • Jeffrey Freudberg
  • Steve Snider
  • Eric Dewhirst
  • Daniel Hadden
  • Masshole Firearms
  • David Tornstrom

If you are not already receiving our updates, stay current with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.

I agree to receive text messages at the mobile number provided.