Question 3 - Constitutional Amendment - Electoral Districts - General Assembly and Congressional Representatives

BALLOT LANGUAGE

FOR the purpose of clarifying that certain requirements apply only to districts for the election of members of the Senate of Maryland and the House of Delegates; authorizing the General Assembly to grant original jurisdiction to the Supreme Court of Maryland to review the congressional districting plan of the State; and providing that nothing in the Maryland Constitution provides applicable criteria for the boundaries of a congressional districting plan. 

(Amending Article III of the Maryland Constitution) 

WHAT IT MEANS

For

A vote “For” this measure would amend the Maryland Constitution to exclude federal congressional districts from redistricting requirements and grant the state Supreme Court original jurisdiction to review congressional districting plans. 

Against

A vote “Against” this measure would keep the current language of the Maryland Constitution which requires state and federal congressional districts to be of adjoining territory, be compact in form, be of substantially equal population, and be within natural and political boundaries.

ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST

For

"MARYLAND IS READY TO FIGHT BACK AGAINST TRUMP 

Donald Trump has tried to rig elections by pressuring states like Texas and Florida to create more Republican districts and lock in Republican control of Congress. Question 3 gives Maryland voters, not politicians, the power to decide whether to respond to Trump's illegal power grab. 

It's one of the strongest tools Democrats have to stop Trump and his MAGA allies' power grab. On November 3rd, vote YES on Question 3 to fight back against Trump. 

Question 3 clarifies that Maryland's constitutional redistricting rules apply only to state legislative districts, not congressional districts, and allows the Maryland Supreme Court to directly review congressional maps. It puts Maryland on a level playing field with other states in how we draw federal seats. 

Trump's policies are crushing Maryland families. Question 3 is our best chance to stop his corruption and the MAGA agenda in their tracks. 

Donald Trump and MAGA legislatures in Florida, Texas, Louisiana, and Alabama redrew their congressional maps to benefit Republicans without voter approval. They started it, and Maryland needs to fight back. 

Question 3 goes directly to the voters, not politicians, giving Maryland the power to decide whether to stop Trump's illegal power grab and help elect a Democratic majority in Congress. 

Question 3 is one of the tools Democrats have to stop Trump and his MAGA allies' power grab to maintain control of Congress and instead elect a Democratic majority, making it easier to stop Trump's corruption and the Trump policies that are crushing Maryland families.

Question 3 is a statewide ballot amendment that gives Maryland voters, not politicians, the power to decide whether Maryland can respond to Trump's illegal power grab. When Trump pushes Republican states like Texas and Florida to redraw their maps and give MAGA more power than they could fairly win at the ballot box, Question 3 gives Maryland a legal tool to fight back.

Donald Trump and MAGA-controlled legislatures in states like Florida, Texas, Louisiana, and Alabama have redrawn their congressional maps to benefit Republicans without voter approval. Maryland should use every legal tool available, including redrawing its own congressional map, to fight back. A YES vote on Question 3 gives Maryland voters, not politicians, the power to decide." - Fight Back MD 

Against

"Politicians in Annapolis want to create the most extreme gerrymandered federal Congressional districts in the nation, but in order to do so, they have to change the Constitution. For over 50 years, language has existed in the Maryland state constitution that calls for fair and compact districts, which is preventing politicians in Annapolis from getting their way and consolidating all power.

This is not about the nation. This is not about any other state. This is about Maryland and what kind of state we want to hand to our children. Changing a half century’s worth of constitutional precedent to amass partisan power and disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of Marylanders is wrong, and every true Marylander knows this.

Redistricting should reflect the will of the people, not guarantee power to whichever party controls Annapolis. When electoral boundaries are drawn to eliminate real competition and ensure one-party rule, voters become disenfranchised and lose their voices.

This is not a complicated issue. It’s a fairly simple one. This is about right and wrong. Changing over 50 years of constitutional history is wrong, and every true Marylander knows this.

For over half a century, Maryland’s Constitution has contained language to protect fair representation, and now they want to change that for partisan power.

This is not about fairness - Maryland already has the most one-sided delegation in a generation. Seven Democrats, one Republican. This amendment exists to make it eight and zero.

A Maryland court ruled the legislature’s last congressional map an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. Annapolis isn’t appealing that ruling; they’re rewriting the Constitution so it can never happen to them again.

Governor Hogan spent eight years on an independent commission split evenly between both parties, specifically so politicians couldn’t draw their own electoral boundaries. The legislature looked at it and did the opposite.

You get one vote while one party gets a permanent advantage. Marylanders vote on the amendment once, this November. The electoral boundaries drawn afterward never come back to voters at all.

This was never about a new map. It’s a rewrite of Maryland’s Constitution, built to erase the exact language that struck down the state’s last gerrymandered electoral boundaries in court.

Governor Larry Hogan’s non-partisan redistricting commission held over 35 public meetings and heard from thousands of Marylanders. The politicians in Annapolis pushing forward with this constitutional amendment will hear from 50 people in one afternoon. That’s not fair. That’s not transparency.

This isn't a one-party tool; it's a blank check for whoever's in charge. This amendment wouldn’t just let Democrats redraw the map today. It would let any party, including Republicans, gerrymander this state the same way tomorrow." - Protect Maryland Votes 

ENDORSEMENTS

For

Barack Obama (Liberal)

AFSCME Maryland Council 3 (Liberal)

Eric Holder (Liberal)

National Democratic Redistricting Committee (Liberal)

Color of Change (Liberal)

Against

Right to Life PAC of Maryland (Conservative)

Chris West (Other)

Justin Ready (Other)

Larry Hogan (Other)

Dan Cox (Other)

FINANCIAL BACKING

The following information provides insight into the money being spent to pass or defeat the ballot measure.

For

MARYLAND QUESTION 3, PROVIDE THAT NOTHING IN STATE CONSTITUTION ESTABLISHES CRITERIA FOR CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING AMENDMENT (2026)

This question is on the ballot in Maryland as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 3, 2026. As of October 29, 2026, the committees formed to support Maryland Question 3, Provide That Nothing in State Constitution Establishes Criteria for Congressional Redistricting Amendment (2026) are:

FIGHT BACK MD

Selected contributions to: "Fight Back MD" include:

  • DGA Action PAC
  • AMERIPAC Future
  • Democracy PAC
  • Democrats Fight Back PAC
  • Mid-Atlantic Laborers' Political Education Fund 
  • Friends Of Joseline Pena-Melnyk
  • Yolanda Martinez
  • Anna Lorch
  • Susan Gelman
  • Ning Mosberger-Tang
  • Peter Snell
  • Gerard?E?Evans
  • Deborah Kirby
  • Michele Wright
  • Mitzi Withrow
  • Fredric Gooding III
  • Katherine Cook
  • Kecia Munroe

FIGHT BACK AGENDA

Selected contributions to: "Fight Back Agenda" include:

As of October 29, 2026, there are no contributions to report.

Against

MARYLAND QUESTION 3, PROVIDE THAT NOTHING IN STATE CONSTITUTION ESTABLISHES CRITERIA FOR CONGRESSIONAL REDISTRICTING AMENDMENT (2026)

This question is on the ballot in Maryland as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 3, 2026. As of October 29, 2026, the committees formed to oppose Maryland Question 3, Provide That Nothing in State Constitution Establishes Criteria for Congressional Redistricting Amendment (2026) are:

PROTECT MARYLAND VOTES

Selected contributions to: "Protect Maryland Votes" include:

  • Robb Merritt
  • Scott Dorsey
  • Randolph Altschuler
  • Lee W. Gaines 
  • John Luetkemeyer
  • Joseph Topper
  • Barry Gossett
  • Benjamin Griswold
  • Christopher West
  • Mitchell Parker
  • Charles Clark
  • Colin Pascal

TRUTH FOR MARYLAND PAC

 Selected contributions to: "Truth for Maryland PAC" include:

As of October 29, 2026, there there are no contributions to report. 

If you are not already receiving our updates, stay current with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.

I agree to receive text messages at the mobile number provided.