State Question 846 - Voter ID Amendment

BALLOT LANGUAGE

This measure adds a new section 6 to article 3 of the Oklahoma Constitution to require proof of identity to vote in any election authorized by law and conducted by a county election board or the State Election Board. The measure requires proof of identity for all authorized methods of voting. The measure requires the Legislature to enact laws to specify requirements for proof of identity for voting. The measure will not have a fiscal impact.

Shall the proposal be approved? 

WHAT IT MEANS

Yes

A "Yes" vote means that you desire to codify Oklahoma's current voter ID requirement into the state constitution and require the state legislature to specify requirements for voter ID. This would prevent future legislatures from repealing the voter ID requirement.

No

A "No" vote means that you desire to keep Oklahoma's current voter ID requirement but not codify it into the state constitution. 

ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST

Yes

“State Question 846 ensures illegal aliens aren’t voting in Oklahoma elections by adding a voter ID requirement to our state Constitution. Voters are already required to show an ID at the polls under state law, but including this language in our Constitution adds another layer of election security that cannot be overridden by future legislators.” - Oklahoma Senate

“We’re fortunate in Oklahoma, we have one of the strongest election systems in the United States. I think it’s important to continue to have protections in our constitution and our statutes so the people of Oklahoma know their elections are secure.” - Kyle Hilbert, State Representative

"We need to know that our elections are safe and secure. What is wrong with making sure that the person that is voting is who they say they are? I don’t see that as a problem." - Jonathan Wingard, State Senator

No

"If we already have safe and secure elections, requiring voter IDs, what does state question 846 change? It changes our state Constitution. Instead of keeping the specific rules we already voted for, it hands the state legislature the power to write brand-new requirements, however and whenever they want. 846 is a constitutional amendment, and that makes this a big deal. It basically hands Oklahoma politicians a blank check on voter ID rules." - Andy Fugate, State Representative 

“This proposal does not respond to documented widespread fraud. It does not cite a demonstrated failure in our current system. Instead it places a new constitutional mandate requiring proof of identity for all methods of voting, including absentee ballots, while leaving the definition entirely to a future legislature.” - Carrie Hicks, State Senator

"SQ 846 was written by powerful politicians at the state capitol who arrogantly assume Oklahomans will vote to give them even more power to decide what qualifies as proof of identity and enshrine it in our constitution.  

Once it’s in the constitution, no future legislature can change it." - Mickey Dollens, State Representative

ENDORSEMENTS

Yes

Justin Humphrey (Other)

Warren Hamilton (Conservative)

John Haste (Conservative)

David Hardin (Other)

Eddy Dempsey (Conservative)

No

Jacob Rosecrants (Liberal)

John Waldron (Liberal)

Mary B. Boren (Liberal)

Carri Hicks (Liberal)

Oklahoma City Democratic Socialists of America (Liberal)

FINANCIAL BACKING

The following information provides insight into the money being spent to pass or defeat the ballot measure.

Yes

OKLAHOMA STATE QUESTION 846, VOTER IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT AMENDMENT (AUGUST 2026)

This question is on the ballot in Oklahoma as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on August 25, 2026. As of August 13, 2026, no committee to support the amendment has been identified. Thus, there is no record of funds raised to support the amendment.

No

OKLAHOMA STATE QUESTION 846, VOTER IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENT AMENDMENT (AUGUST 2026)

This question is on the ballot in Oklahoma as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on August 25, 2026. As of August 13, 2026, no committee to oppose the amendment has been identified. Thus, there is no record of funds raised to oppose the amendment.

If you are not already receiving our updates, stay current with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.

I agree to receive text messages at the mobile number provided.