David Wecht

Democrat | Pennsylvania

Candidate Profile

EvaluationInProgress

BIOGRAPHY

Name

David Wecht


Party

Democrat


Election Year

2025


Election

PA General School Boards, Judicial & Municipal Races


Race

Supreme Court (retention of Wecht)


Incumbent

Yes


Links

David Wecht websites
FacebookXInstagram

EDUCATION

Yale University, New Haven, CT, B.A., 1984

The Yale Law School, New Haven, CT, J.D., 1987

WORK & MILITARY

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, Law Clerk (Hon. George MacKinnon), 1987-1988

AFFILIATIONS

Parent Education & Advocacy Leadership (PEAL), Board of Directors (2013 - Present)

The Pennsylvania Society, Member (2013 - Present)

The American Law Institute, Member (2013 - Present)

Duquesne University School of Law, Adjunct Professor (1997 - Present)

University of Pittsburgh (GSPIA), Adjunct Professor (2010 - Present)

Allegheny Co. Bar Association, Member / Volunteer / Panelist (1993 - Present)

American Bar Association, Member

The Amen Corner, Board of Governors (2002 - 2005)

POLITICAL OFFICES HELD

Judge of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2012 - Present

Judge of the Court of Common of Pleas (5th Distr.), 2003 - 2011

POLITICAL OFFICES SOUGHT

Judge of the Superior Court, 2003

ENDORSEMENTS

LIBERAL (1)

Conservation Voters of Pennsylvania

OTHER (1)

1000 Women Strong PAC

SELECTED CONTRIBUTIONS

CONSERVATIVE
GIVEN BY CANDIDATE (0)

RECEIVED BY CANDIDATE (1)

Northwest Good Government PAC (2015)


LIBERAL
GIVEN BY CANDIDATE (4)

Local, County, and District Democratic Organizations (2015); PA Future PAC (2015); State Democratic Party Organizations (2015); Young Democrats of America (2011)

RECEIVED BY CANDIDATE (41)

United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (2016); American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (2015); American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees (2015); American Federation of Teachers (2015); Association of Pennsylvania State College & University Faculty (2015)

OTHER INFORMATION

David Wecht has been rated as Activist by iVoterGuide in 2025.

In Majoritarianism Run Riot: Christian Supremacism and the Religion Clauses ,Wecht warns that recent Supreme Court rulings undermine the Establishment Clause, elevate Christian majoritorianism, and threaten religious pluralism in the U.S.

Article, Tablet Magazine: Justice Wecht discusses antisemitism calling it a "national crisis" and urges action through education and free speech.

Article In the Jewish Chronicle on Justice Wecht calling for activism against antisemitism.

In Allegheny Reproductive Health v. Pennsylvania DHS (2024), Justice Wecht agreed that leaving abortions out of Medicaid coverage was unconstitutional and is always sex-based discrimination. He suggested the Court look at other parts of the constitution to help protect abortion rights in the future.  

For more details, see case summary. Justice Wecht's concurring opinion.

Int. of K.T. (2023), involved termination of a mother's parental rights. Justice Wecht disagreed with the majority, arguing they created a new test that wasn't supported by law and warned it could unfairly favor adoption over preserving parental-child bond.
 
For a more detailed summary, see case summary. Justice Wecht's dissenting opinion.

In Pennsylvania v. Barr (2021), Justice Wecht joined the majority holding that under Pennsylvania's Medicaid Act, the smell of marijuana alone cannot justify a warrantless vehicle search. 

For more details, see case summary.

In Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar (2020), the Court considered statewide mail-in voting rules for the 2020 election. Justice Wecht joined the which held that drop boxes and satellite offices were allowed, ballots could be counted if received three days late because of COVID-19, ballots without a secrecy envelope could be rejected, and poll watchers had to live in the county. Justice Wecht wrote separately, saying the law should be clearer so the court can follow it exactly.

For more details, see case summary.

In Commonwealth v. Alexander (2020), Philadelphia police searched the defendant's car without a warrant after smelling marijuana and found heroin. Justice Wecht joined the majority, which overruled Commonwealth v. Gary and said that under the Pennsylvania Constitution, warrantless vehicle searches require probable cause and exigent circumstances (urgent reason), giving stronger privacy protection than the federal standard for warrantless vehicles searches.

For more details, see case summary.

If you are not already receiving our emails, stay up to date with important election alerts, educational articles, and encouraging reminders.