Constitutional Measure 2 - Relating to Initiated Constitutional Amendments
BALLOT LANGUAGE
WHAT IT MEANS
Yes
No
ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST
Yes
-
“The North Dakota Constitution stands naked on Main Street. So, anyone out of state with a couple of million dollars can attach it to a dart and just throw it into our state and change our Constitution. It is way too easy.” - Janne Myrdal, North Dakota State Senator
-
“It’s really not fair to the voters to introduce three or four different subjects in the same measure. Amending our state constitution should not be a Sunday walk in the park, so we think people should have a chance to vote on it and really decide if they want to pass this and impose this on generations to come.” - David Hogue, North Dakota State Senator
-
“This is not the legislature taking power from the people, this is the legislature putting it before the voters for the voters to consider whether or not these protections should be in place for the constitution. Just on the mood of the moment. When some crisis happens, we have to change it. We need to prevent that kind of mentality. I think it provides transparency, it provides that opportunity for better informed votes." - Dick Dever, North Dakota State Senator
No
- "Measure 2 is a three-pronged attack on our state’s ballot initiative process that would make it far more difficult for North Dakotans to write, qualify, and pass constitutional amendments in the future. The ballot initiative process is an important check on the power of politicians in our state – we should preserve it." - Voter Defense Association of North Dakota
-
“The proposed amendment is part of a trend of Republican-controlled states moving to restrict the ballot measure process in recent years. Voters in many states have used the process to enact policies over the objections of Republican legislators, such as protections for reproductive freedoms, minimum wage increases and Medicaid expansion.” - Democracy Docket
-
“Measure 2 is the Legislature’s attempt to save the people from themselves. They believe that the voters are being hoodwinked by all this out-of-state money, and that the voters are not educated enough to vote the right way. We think that the voters who put those very legislators in office are more than capable of figuring out what’s going on with the various measures, and that the desire for the Legislature to have a veto over the will of the people is contrary to our state constitution as it stands, because it would change the way that our ‘powers reserved to the people’ are actually truly reserved.” - Dustin Gawrylow, North Dakota's Watchdog Update
ENDORSEMENTS
FINANCIAL BACKING
The following information provides insight into the money being spent to pass or defeat the ballot measure.
Yes
This question is on the ballot in North Dakota as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 5, 2024. As of September 29, 2024, no committee to support or oppose the amendment has been identified. Thus, there is no record of funds raised to support either position.
No
This question is on the ballot in North Dakota as a legislatively referred constitutional amendment on November 5, 2024. As of September 29, 2024, no committee to support or oppose the amendment has been identified. Thus, there is no record of funds raised to support either position.